Suppr超能文献

四种不同结直肠手术技术吻合强度的比较。

Comparison of Strength of Anastomosis Between Four Different Techniques for Colorectal Surgery.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Department of Surgery, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan

出版信息

Anticancer Res. 2020 Apr;40(4):1891-1896. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.14143.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIM: Advances in stapling devices have led to their widespread use in colorectal surgery. We compared the strength of four types of anastomoses using bursting pressure.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We created stapled anastomosis models [double stapling technique (DST), functional end-to-end anastomosis (FEEA) unbuttressed or buttressed, and triangulating anastomosis (TA) with two- or three-row stapling] and a hand-sewn anastomosis model. Bursting pressures of each method were measured. The primary end point was the bursting pressure. The effectiveness of buttressing and three-row stapling were the secondary endpoints.

RESULTS

The DST group had significantly lower bursting pressure than TA with three-row stapling, FEEA buttressed, and hand-sewn groups. No significant difference was found between the bursting pressure of the FEEA unbuttressed and FEEA buttressed groups and that of the TA with two-row and three-row stapling groups.

CONCLUSION

DST has the lowest bursting pressure compared to other anastomotic techniques. Buttressing suture and three-row stapling have no effect on the strength of anastomosis.

摘要

背景/目的:吻合器技术的进步使其在结直肠外科中得到广泛应用。我们通过爆破压力比较了四种吻合方式的强度。

材料和方法

我们创建了吻合模型(双吻合器技术(DST)、功能性端端吻合(FEEA)非支撑或支撑、三角吻合(TA),采用两排或三排吻合器)和手工吻合模型。测量了每种方法的爆破压力。主要终点是爆破压力。支撑和三排吻合器的有效性是次要终点。

结果

DST 组的爆破压力明显低于 TA 组(三排吻合器)、FEEA 支撑组和手工组。FEEA 非支撑组和 FEEA 支撑组的爆破压力与 TA 组(两排和三排吻合器)之间无显著差异。

结论

与其他吻合技术相比,DST 的爆破压力最低。支撑缝线和三排吻合器对吻合强度没有影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验