Department of Surgery, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Department of Surgery, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
Anticancer Res. 2020 Apr;40(4):1891-1896. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.14143.
BACKGROUND/AIM: Advances in stapling devices have led to their widespread use in colorectal surgery. We compared the strength of four types of anastomoses using bursting pressure.
We created stapled anastomosis models [double stapling technique (DST), functional end-to-end anastomosis (FEEA) unbuttressed or buttressed, and triangulating anastomosis (TA) with two- or three-row stapling] and a hand-sewn anastomosis model. Bursting pressures of each method were measured. The primary end point was the bursting pressure. The effectiveness of buttressing and three-row stapling were the secondary endpoints.
The DST group had significantly lower bursting pressure than TA with three-row stapling, FEEA buttressed, and hand-sewn groups. No significant difference was found between the bursting pressure of the FEEA unbuttressed and FEEA buttressed groups and that of the TA with two-row and three-row stapling groups.
DST has the lowest bursting pressure compared to other anastomotic techniques. Buttressing suture and three-row stapling have no effect on the strength of anastomosis.
背景/目的:吻合器技术的进步使其在结直肠外科中得到广泛应用。我们通过爆破压力比较了四种吻合方式的强度。
我们创建了吻合模型(双吻合器技术(DST)、功能性端端吻合(FEEA)非支撑或支撑、三角吻合(TA),采用两排或三排吻合器)和手工吻合模型。测量了每种方法的爆破压力。主要终点是爆破压力。支撑和三排吻合器的有效性是次要终点。
DST 组的爆破压力明显低于 TA 组(三排吻合器)、FEEA 支撑组和手工组。FEEA 非支撑组和 FEEA 支撑组的爆破压力与 TA 组(两排和三排吻合器)之间无显著差异。
与其他吻合技术相比,DST 的爆破压力最低。支撑缝线和三排吻合器对吻合强度没有影响。