• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人辅助腹腔镜手术治疗技术难度较大的直肠癌的短期疗效。

Short-term Outcomes Following Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Surgery for Technically Demanding Rectal Cancer.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Japan

Department of Surgery, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Japan.

出版信息

Anticancer Res. 2020 Apr;40(4):2337-2342. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.14201.

DOI:10.21873/anticanres.14201
PMID:32234935
Abstract

AIM

To clarify the benefits of robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery (RALS) regarding short-term outcomes in patients with technically demanding rectal cancer (TDRC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between April 2015 and September 2019, 88 TDRC cases were identified from our database, and divided into the RALS (n=32) and conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS) (n=56) groups. TDRC was defined as mid-rectal tumors presenting at least one of the following risk factors: Male sex, high body mass index, T4 stage, bulky tumor, or low rectal tumor.

RESULTS

Patient baseline characteristics were similar in both groups. One and 15 patients developed anastomotic leakage in the RALS and CLS groups (3% vs. 27%, p<0.01), respectively. The postoperative complication rate was lower in the RALS group (19% vs. 43%, p=0.03). Multivariate analysis showed the surgical approach to be an independent predictor for anastomotic leakage.

CONCLUSION

RALS has potential advantages to prevent anastomotic leakage complications in patients with TDRC.

摘要

目的

明确机器人辅助腹腔镜手术(RALS)在技术难度较大的直肠癌(TDRC)患者短期结局方面的优势。

患者与方法

从我们的数据库中确定了 88 例 TDRC 病例,分为 RALS(n=32)和传统腹腔镜手术(CLS)(n=56)组。TDRC 定义为至少存在以下一种危险因素的中直肠肿瘤:男性、高体质指数、T4 期、肿瘤体积大或低位直肠肿瘤。

结果

两组患者的基线特征相似。RALS 组和 CLS 组各有 1 例和 15 例患者发生吻合口漏(3%比 27%,p<0.01)。RALS 组的术后并发症发生率较低(19%比 43%,p=0.03)。多变量分析显示手术方式是吻合口漏的独立预测因素。

结论

RALS 有潜力预防 TDRC 患者的吻合口漏并发症。

相似文献

1
Short-term Outcomes Following Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Surgery for Technically Demanding Rectal Cancer.机器人辅助腹腔镜手术治疗技术难度较大的直肠癌的短期疗效。
Anticancer Res. 2020 Apr;40(4):2337-2342. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.14201.
2
Robotic-assisted vs. conventional laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: short-term outcomes at a single center.机器人辅助与传统腹腔镜手术治疗直肠癌:单中心短期疗效
Surg Today. 2016 Aug;46(8):957-62. doi: 10.1007/s00595-015-1266-4. Epub 2015 Oct 19.
3
A Comparative Study of Single-Port Laparoscopic Surgery Versus Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal Cancer.单孔腹腔镜手术与机器人辅助腹腔镜手术治疗直肠癌的对比研究
Surg Innov. 2015 Aug;22(4):368-75. doi: 10.1177/1553350614556367. Epub 2014 Nov 5.
4
Creatine kinase elevation after robotic surgery for rectal cancer due to a prolonged lithotomy position.直肠癌机器人手术后因截石位时间延长导致肌酸激酶升高。
BMC Surg. 2020 Jun 16;20(1):136. doi: 10.1186/s12893-020-00771-2.
5
Short- and long-term outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: results of a single high-volume center in Japan.机器人辅助腹腔镜直肠癌手术的短期和长期结果:日本一家高手术量中心的结果
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2018 Dec;33(12):1755-1762. doi: 10.1007/s00384-018-3153-0. Epub 2018 Sep 6.
6
Comparison of short-term outcomes of robotic-assisted and conventional laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: A propensity score-matched analysis.机器人辅助与传统腹腔镜手术治疗直肠癌的短期疗效比较:倾向评分匹配分析。
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2022 Oct;15(4):753-764. doi: 10.1111/ases.13075. Epub 2022 May 12.
7
Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic surgery for lower rectal cancer: the impact of visceral obesity on surgical outcomes.机器人辅助与腹腔镜手术治疗低位直肠癌:内脏肥胖对手术结果的影响
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2016 Oct;31(10):1701-10. doi: 10.1007/s00384-016-2653-z. Epub 2016 Sep 6.
8
Short-term outcomes of robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for mid and low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: a propensity score-matched analysis.新辅助放化疗后机器人辅助与传统腹腔镜手术治疗中低位直肠癌的短期疗效比较:倾向评分匹配分析。
J Robot Surg. 2023 Jun;17(3):959-969. doi: 10.1007/s11701-022-01498-3. Epub 2022 Nov 21.
9
[Risk factors of anastomotic leakage after robotic surgery for low and mid rectal cancer].[低位和中位直肠癌机器人手术后吻合口漏的危险因素]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Apr 25;23(4):364-369. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn.441530-20200212-00052.
10
Robotic-assisted laparoscopic versus open lateral lymph node dissection for advanced lower rectal cancer.机器人辅助腹腔镜与开放手术治疗晚期低位直肠癌的侧方淋巴结清扫术对比
Surg Endosc. 2016 Feb;30(2):721-728. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4266-y. Epub 2015 Jun 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Utility of High-positioning Pelvic Pads in Laparoscopic Sigmoid Colon and Rectal Surgeries.高位盆腔垫在腹腔镜乙状结肠和直肠手术中的应用
In Vivo. 2025 Mar-Apr;39(2):1078-1085. doi: 10.21873/invivo.13912.
2
Robotic versus laparoscopic approaches for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of postoperative complications, anastomotic leak, and mortality.机器人与腹腔镜治疗直肠癌的比较:术后并发症、吻合口漏和死亡率的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024 Nov 22;409(1):353. doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03545-z.
3
Nomogram for predicting the surgical difficulty of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision and exploring the technical advantages of robotic surgery.
预测腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术手术难度的列线图及探索机器人手术的技术优势
Front Oncol. 2024 Jan 26;14:1303686. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1303686. eCollection 2024.
4
Risk Factors and Preventive Measures for Anastomotic Leak in Colorectal Cancer.结直肠癌吻合口漏的危险因素和预防措施。
Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2022 Jan-Dec;21:15330338221118983. doi: 10.1177/15330338221118983.