• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

优化短信以促进对互联网戒烟治疗的参与度:析因筛选实验的结果

Optimizing Text Messages to Promote Engagement With Internet Smoking Cessation Treatment: Results From a Factorial Screening Experiment.

作者信息

Graham Amanda L, Papandonatos George D, Jacobs Megan A, Amato Michael S, Cha Sarah, Cohn Amy M, Abroms Lorien C, Whittaker Robyn

机构信息

Innovations Center, Truth Initiative, Washington, DC, United States.

Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN, United States.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2020 Apr 2;22(4):e17734. doi: 10.2196/17734.

DOI:10.2196/17734
PMID:32238338
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7386536/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Smoking remains a leading cause of preventable death and illness. Internet interventions for smoking cessation have the potential to significantly impact public health, given their broad reach and proven effectiveness. Given the dose-response association between engagement and behavior change, identifying strategies to promote engagement is a priority across digital health interventions. Text messaging is a proven smoking cessation treatment modality and a powerful strategy to increase intervention engagement in other areas of health, but it has not been tested as an engagement strategy for a digital cessation intervention.

OBJECTIVE

This study examined the impact of 4 experimental text message design factors on adult smokers' engagement with an internet smoking cessation program.

METHODS

We conducted a 2×2×2×2 full factorial screening experiment wherein 864 participants were randomized to 1 of 16 experimental conditions after registering with a free internet smoking cessation program and enrolling in its automated text message program. Experimental factors were personalization (on/off), integration between the web and text message platforms (on/off), dynamic tailoring of intervention content based on user engagement (on/off), and message intensity (tapered vs abrupt drop-off). Primary outcomes were 3-month measures of engagement (ie, page views, time on site, and return visits to the website) as well as use of 6 interactive features of the internet program. All metrics were automatically tracked; there were no missing data.

RESULTS

Main effects were detected for integration and dynamic tailoring. Integration significantly increased interactive feature use by participants, whereas dynamic tailoring increased the number of features used and page views. No main effects were found for message intensity or personalization alone, although several synergistic interactions with other experimental features were observed. Synergistic effects, when all experimental factors were active, resulted in the highest rates of interactive feature use and the greatest proportion of participants at high levels of engagement. Measured in terms of standardized mean differences (SMDs), effects on interactive feature use were highest for Build Support System (SMD 0.56; 95% CI 0.27 to 0.81), Choose Quit Smoking Aid (SMD 0.38; 95% CI 0.10 to 0.66), and Track Smoking Triggers (SMD 0.33; 95% CI 0.05 to 0.61). Among the engagement metrics, the largest effects were on overall feature utilization (SMD 0.33; 95% CI 0.06 to 0.59) and time on site (SMD 0.29; 95% CI 0.01 to 0.57). As no SMD >0.30 was observed for main effects on any outcome, results suggest that for some outcomes, the combined intervention was stronger than individual factors alone.

CONCLUSIONS

This factorial experiment demonstrates the effectiveness of text messaging as a strategy to increase engagement with an internet smoking cessation intervention, resulting in greater overall intervention dose and greater exposure to the core components of tobacco dependence treatment that can promote abstinence.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02585206; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02585206.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010687.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ee8/7386536/d783e9f25f9d/jmir_v22i4e17734_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ee8/7386536/a5c9c5a3daf3/jmir_v22i4e17734_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ee8/7386536/d783e9f25f9d/jmir_v22i4e17734_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ee8/7386536/a5c9c5a3daf3/jmir_v22i4e17734_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ee8/7386536/d783e9f25f9d/jmir_v22i4e17734_fig2.jpg
摘要

背景

吸烟仍然是可预防死亡和疾病的主要原因。鉴于网络戒烟干预措施覆盖面广且已证实有效,其有潜力对公众健康产生重大影响。鉴于参与度与行为改变之间的剂量反应关联,确定促进参与的策略是数字健康干预措施的首要任务。短信是一种已证实的戒烟治疗方式,也是提高其他健康领域干预措施参与度的有力策略,但尚未作为数字戒烟干预措施的参与策略进行测试。

目的

本研究探讨了4个实验性短信设计因素对成年吸烟者参与网络戒烟计划的影响。

方法

我们进行了一项2×2×2×2全因子筛选实验,864名参与者在注册免费网络戒烟计划并加入其自动短信计划后,被随机分配到16种实验条件中的一种。实验因素包括个性化(开/关)、网络与短信平台之间的整合(开/关)、根据用户参与度动态调整干预内容(开/关)以及信息强度(逐渐减少与突然下降)。主要结局是3个月的参与度指标(即页面浏览量、网站停留时间和网站回访次数)以及网络计划6个互动功能的使用情况。所有指标均自动跟踪;无缺失数据。

结果

检测到整合和动态调整的主效应。整合显著增加了参与者对互动功能的使用,而动态调整增加了使用的功能数量和页面浏览量。单独的信息强度或个性化未发现主效应,尽管观察到与其他实验特征的一些协同相互作用。当所有实验因素都起作用时,协同效应导致互动功能使用频率最高,参与度高的参与者比例最大。以标准化均值差(SMD)衡量,对互动功能使用的影响在建立支持系统方面最高(SMD 0.56;95%CI 0.27至0.81)、选择戒烟辅助工具方面(SMD 0.38;95%CI 0.10至0.66)以及跟踪吸烟触发因素方面(SMD 0.33;95%CI 0.05至0.61)。在参与度指标中,最大影响在于总体功能利用率(SMD 0.33;95%CI 0.06至0.59)和网站停留时间(SMD 0.29;95%CI 0.01至0.57)。由于未观察到任何结局的主效应的SMD>0.30,结果表明对于某些结局,联合干预比单独的个体因素更强。

结论

这项析因实验证明了短信作为一种提高网络戒烟干预措施参与度的策略的有效性,从而导致更高的总体干预剂量以及更多地接触可促进戒烟的烟草依赖治疗核心成分。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02585206;https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02585206。

国际注册报告识别码(IRRID):RR2-10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010687。

相似文献

1
Optimizing Text Messages to Promote Engagement With Internet Smoking Cessation Treatment: Results From a Factorial Screening Experiment.优化短信以促进对互联网戒烟治疗的参与度:析因筛选实验的结果
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Apr 2;22(4):e17734. doi: 10.2196/17734.
2
Effectiveness of an optimized text message and Internet intervention for smoking cessation: A randomized controlled trial.优化短信和互联网干预措施对戒烟效果的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Addiction. 2022 Apr;117(4):1035-1046. doi: 10.1111/add.15677. Epub 2021 Sep 28.
3
Optimising text messaging to improve adherence to web-based smoking cessation treatment: a randomised control trial protocol.优化短信以提高对基于网络的戒烟治疗的依从性:一项随机对照试验方案
BMJ Open. 2016 Mar 30;6(3):e010687. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010687.
4
The effect of program design on engagement with an internet-based smoking intervention: randomized factorial trial.项目设计对基于互联网的吸烟干预参与度的影响:随机析因试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Mar 25;15(3):e69. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2508.
5
Adaptation and Assessment of a Text Messaging Smoking Cessation Intervention in Vietnam: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.在越南对短信戒烟干预措施进行调整和评估: 试点随机对照试验。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Oct 8;9(10):e27478. doi: 10.2196/27478.
6
An integrated digital/clinical approach to smoking cessation in lung cancer screening: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.肺癌筛查中戒烟的综合数字/临床方法:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2017 Nov 28;18(1):568. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2312-x.
7
Effectiveness of Message Frame-Tailoring in a Web-Based Smoking Cessation Program: Randomized Controlled Trial.基于网络的戒烟项目中信息框架定制的有效性:随机对照试验
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Apr 3;22(4):e17251. doi: 10.2196/17251.
8
Comparing the Efficacy of an Identical, Tailored Smoking Cessation Intervention Delivered by Mobile Text Messaging Versus Email: Randomized Controlled Trial.比较通过手机短信和电子邮件提供的相同定制戒烟干预措施的效果:随机对照试验。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Sep 27;7(9):e12137. doi: 10.2196/12137.
9
Outcomes and Device Usage for Fully Automated Internet Interventions Designed for a Smartphone or Personal Computer: The MobileQuit Smoking Cessation Randomized Controlled Trial.专为智能手机或个人电脑设计的全自动互联网干预措施的效果及设备使用情况:戒烟移动随机对照试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Jun 6;21(6):e13290. doi: 10.2196/13290.
10
A Digital Smoking Cessation Program for Heavy Drinkers: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.一项针对重度饮酒者的数字戒烟计划:试点随机对照试验。
JMIR Form Res. 2020 Jun 8;4(6):e7570. doi: 10.2196/formative.7570.

引用本文的文献

1
Towards AI-Driven Healthcare: Systematic Optimization, Linguistic Analysis, and Clinicians' Evaluation of Large Language Models for Smoking Cessation Interventions.迈向人工智能驱动的医疗保健:大型语言模型在戒烟干预中的系统优化、语言分析及临床医生评估
Proc SIGCHI Conf Hum Factor Comput Syst. 2024 May;2024. doi: 10.1145/3613904.3641965. Epub 2024 May 11.
2
The Use of Text Messaging as an Adjunct to Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Major Depressive Disorder in Youth: Secondary Analysis.短信作为基于互联网的认知行为疗法辅助手段治疗青少年重度抑郁症的研究:二次分析
JMIR Form Res. 2024 May 31;8:e40275. doi: 10.2196/40275.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Mobile phone text messaging and app-based interventions for smoking cessation.用于戒烟的手机短信和基于应用程序的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Oct 22;10(10):CD006611. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006611.pub5.
2
Engagement and attrition in Internet smoking cessation interventions: Insights from a cross-sectional survey of "one-hit-wonders".互联网戒烟干预中的参与度与退出率:对“昙花一现者”横断面调查的见解
Internet Interv. 2016 Jul 7;5:23-29. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2016.07.001. eCollection 2016 Sep.
3
What makes online substance-use interventions engaging? A systematic review and narrative synthesis.
The Impact of Intervention Design on User Engagement in Digital Therapeutics Research: Factorial Experiment With a Mixed Methods Study.
干预设计对数字疗法研究中用户参与度的影响:一项混合方法研究的析因实验
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Feb 9;8:e51225. doi: 10.2196/51225.
4
Mobile Phone-Based Interventions for Smoking Cessation Among Young People: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.基于手机的干预措施在青少年戒烟中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2023 Sep 12;11:e48253. doi: 10.2196/48253.
5
Optimising engagement in a digital parenting intervention to prevent violence against adolescents in Tanzania: protocol for a cluster randomised factorial trial.优化数字育儿干预措施的参与度以预防坦桑尼亚青少年暴力行为:一项群组随机化因子试验方案。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Jun 23;23(1):1224. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15989-x.
6
Digital Interventions for Social Participation in Adults with Long-term Physical Conditions: A Systematic Review.数字干预措施对长期躯体疾病成人社会参与的影响:系统评价。
J Med Syst. 2023 Feb 16;47(1):26. doi: 10.1007/s10916-023-01914-7.
7
A Digital Video and Text Messaging Intervention to Support People With Chronic Pain During Opioid Tapering: Content Development Using Co-design.一种支持阿片类药物减量期间慢性疼痛患者的数字视频和短信干预:采用协同设计的内容开发
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Nov 10;6(11):e40507. doi: 10.2196/40507.
8
Mindfulness and Mobile Health for Quitting Smoking: A Qualitative Study Among Predominantly African American Adults with Low Socioeconomic Status.正念与移动健康助力戒烟:对社会经济地位较低的非裔美国成年人的定性研究
Am J Qual Res. 2022;6(1):19-41. doi: 10.29333/ajqr/11427.
9
Barriers to Building More Effective Treatments: Negative Interactions Amongst Smoking Intervention Components.构建更有效治疗方法的障碍:吸烟干预各组成部分之间的负面相互作用
Clin Psychol Sci. 2021 Nov 1;9(6):995-1020. doi: 10.1177/2167702621994551. Epub 2021 Apr 26.
10
Understanding Engagement Strategies in Digital Interventions for Mental Health Promotion: Scoping Review.理解促进心理健康的数字干预中的参与策略:范围综述
JMIR Ment Health. 2021 Dec 20;8(12):e30000. doi: 10.2196/30000.
是什么让在线物质使用干预具有吸引力?一项系统评价与叙述性综合分析。
Digit Health. 2018 Feb 1;4:2055207617743354. doi: 10.1177/2055207617743354. eCollection 2018 Jan-Dec.
4
Improving Adherence to Smoking Cessation Treatment: Smoking Outcomes in a Web-based Randomized Trial.提高戒烟治疗的依从性:基于网络的随机试验中的吸烟结果。
Ann Behav Med. 2018 Mar 15;52(4):331-341. doi: 10.1093/abm/kax023.
5
Twelve Million Smokers Look Online for Smoking Cessation Help Annually: Health Information National Trends Survey Data, 2005-2017.每年有 1200 万烟民在网上寻求戒烟帮助:2005-2017 年健康信息国家趋势调查数据。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2019 Jan 4;21(2):249-252. doi: 10.1093/ntr/nty043.
6
Internet-based interventions for smoking cessation.基于互联网的戒烟干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 4;9(9):CD007078. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007078.pub5.
7
A prospective examination of online social network dynamics and smoking cessation.在线社交网络动态与戒烟的前瞻性研究。
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 23;12(8):e0183655. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183655. eCollection 2017.
8
The failure to increase social support: it just might be time to stop intervening (and start rigorously observing).未能增加社会支持:也许是时候停止干预(并开始严格观察)了。
Transl Behav Med. 2017 Dec;7(4):816-820. doi: 10.1007/s13142-016-0458-9.
9
Conceptualising engagement with digital behaviour change interventions: a systematic review using principles from critical interpretive synthesis.对数字行为改变干预措施参与度的概念化:一项运用批判性解释性综合原则的系统评价
Transl Behav Med. 2017 Jun;7(2):254-267. doi: 10.1007/s13142-016-0453-1.
10
Analysing user-reported data for enhancement of SmokefreeTXT: a national text message smoking cessation intervention.分析用户报告数据以增强 SmokefreeTXT:一项全国性的短信戒烟干预措施。
Tob Control. 2017 Nov;26(6):683-689. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-052945. Epub 2016 Nov 15.