Suppr超能文献

ISO/TS 20914:2019——批判性评论。

ISO/TS 20914:2019 - a critical commentary.

作者信息

Farrance Ian, Frenkel Robert, Badrick Tony

机构信息

Discipline of Laboratory Medicine, School of Health and Biomedical Sciences, RMIT University, Victoria, Australia.

Roseville, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

Clin Chem Lab Med. 2020 Jul 28;58(8):1182-1190. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2019-1209.

Abstract

The long-anticipated ISO/TS 20914, Medical laboratories - Practical guidance for the estimation of measurement uncertainty, became publicly available in July 2019. This ISO document is intended as a guide for the practical application of estimating uncertainty in measurement (measurement uncertainty) in a medical laboratory. In some respects, the guide does indeed meet many of its stated objectives with numerous very detailed examples. Even though it is claimed that this ISO guide is based on the Evaluation of measurement data - Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (GUM), JCGM 100:2008, it is with some concern that we believe several important statements and statistical procedures are incorrect, with others potentially misleading. The aim of this report is to highlight the major concerns which we have identified. In particular, we believe the following items require further comment: (1) The use of coefficient of variation and its potential for misuse requires clarification, (2) pooled variance and measurement uncertainty across changes in measuring conditions has been oversimplified and is potentially misleading, (3) uncertainty in the results of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) do not include all known uncertainties, (4) the international normalized ratio (INR) calculation is incorrect, (5) the treatment of bias uncertainty is considered problematic, (6) the rules for evaluating combined uncertainty in functional relationships are incomplete, and (7) specific concerns with some individual statements.

摘要

期待已久的ISO/TS 20914《医学实验室——测量不确定度评定实用指南》于2019年7月正式发布。本ISO文件旨在为医学实验室测量不确定度评定(测量不确定度)的实际应用提供指导。在某些方面,该指南确实通过众多非常详细的示例实现了其许多既定目标。尽管声称本ISO指南基于《测量数据的评价——测量不确定度表示指南》(GUM),JCGM 100:2008,但我们担心一些重要陈述和统计程序是不正确的,其他一些可能会产生误导。本报告的目的是突出我们已确定的主要问题。特别是,我们认为以下几点需要进一步说明:(1)变异系数的使用及其潜在的误用需要澄清;(2)合并方差和测量条件变化时的测量不确定度被过度简化且可能产生误导;(3)估算肾小球滤过率(eGFR)结果的不确定度未包含所有已知的不确定度;(4)国际标准化比值(INR)计算不正确;(5)偏差不确定度的处理存在问题;(6)功能关系中合成不确定度的评估规则不完整;(7)对一些个别陈述的具体关注。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验