Suppr超能文献

基于爬升和盘旋任务行为的飞行员注意力分配。

Attention allocation in pilots based on climbing and circling mission behavior.

机构信息

School of Psychology, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an, 710062, Shaanxi, China.

Shaanxi Provincial Key Laboratory of Behavior and Cognitive Neuroscience, Xi'an, 710062, Shaanxi, China.

出版信息

Psychol Res. 2021 Apr;85(3):1136-1145. doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01324-1. Epub 2020 Apr 1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Exploration of changes in eye movement at different flight conditions can enrich scholarly understanding of situation awareness (SA) and inform new scanning behavior training techniques for efficient and effective pilot education.

BACKGROUND

The SA requirements for pilots vary from mission to mission. Eye tracking is often used to analyze various attention allocation and SA acquisition processes at work in different missions.

METHODS

Pilot eye movements were measured during a climbing task and circling task using a cockpit-based simulator.

RESULTS

Results of situation awareness rating technique (SART) tests show that there are significant differences between attention processes during climbing versus circling flight tasks. Fixation frequency during climbing is lower than in the circling task. Additionally, saccade frequency and average fixation time in the climbing task are markedly higher than those in the circling task. Wilcoxon test results show that the pilot has a higher fixation count and fixation time during the circling phase in out-view (OV) areas of interest (AOI) than during the climbing phase. Notably, the attention probability is higher in climbing task than in circling task when the current area of fixation (AOF) is in the head-up display (HUD) AOI and the next fixation area is in the instrumentation panel left (IPL); when the current AOF is in the out-view right (OVR) and the next AOF is HUD, the attention probability is higher in climbing task than in circling task; when the current fixation is in the IPL and the next fixation probability is to the out-view left (OVL), the attention probability is higher in task climbing task than in circling task. In terms of the Markov stationary distribution, the Wilcoxon test shows that, when IPL AOI is the area of the maximum probability of fixation in both tasks, the attention probability of HUD AOI and instrumentation panel right (IPR) is higher in climbing task than in circling task.

CONCLUSION

Circling tasks require efficient eye movement patterns accompanied by strict attention distribution, which yields high SA level and flight performance when performed properly.

APPLICATION

This paper summarizes the attention characteristics at different flight phases and various requirements of different tasks according to pilot eye movement tracking results. Similar activities, as routine training, can enhance the efficiency of a novice pilot's attention distribution.

摘要

目的

探索不同飞行条件下眼动变化,丰富态势感知(SA)学术理解,并为飞行员高效、有效的教育提供新的扫描行为训练技术。

背景

飞行员的 SA 要求因任务而异。眼动追踪通常用于分析不同任务中不同注意力分配和 SA 获取过程。

方法

使用基于驾驶舱的模拟器在爬升任务和盘旋任务中测量飞行员的眼动。

结果

态势感知评分技术(SART)测试结果表明,在爬升和盘旋飞行任务中,注意过程存在显著差异。爬升时的注视频率低于盘旋任务。此外,在爬升任务中,眼跳频率和平均注视时间明显高于盘旋任务。Wilcoxon 检验结果表明,在视场外(OV)感兴趣区域(AOI)中,飞行员在盘旋阶段的注视次数和注视时间高于爬升阶段。值得注意的是,当当前注视区域(AOF)在抬头显示器(HUD)AOI 中,下一注视区域在仪表板左侧(IPL)时,爬升任务中的注意力概率高于盘旋任务;当当前 AOF 在视场外右侧(OVR)且下一 AOF 在 HUD 中时,爬升任务中的注意力概率高于盘旋任务;当当前注视在 IPL 中且下一注视概率在视场外左侧(OVL)时,爬升任务中的注意力概率高于盘旋任务。在马尔可夫平稳分布方面,Wilcoxon 检验表明,当 IPL AOI 是两个任务中注视概率最大的区域时,HUD AOI 和仪表板右侧(IPR)的注意力概率在爬升任务中高于盘旋任务。

结论

盘旋任务需要有效的眼动模式,并严格分配注意力,从而在正确执行时获得较高的 SA 水平和飞行性能。

应用

本文根据飞行员眼动跟踪结果总结了不同飞行阶段的注意力特征和不同任务的不同要求。类似的活动,如常规训练,可以提高新手飞行员注意力分配的效率。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验