Suppr超能文献

髋关节骨折后,贫困如何影响二级医疗保健费用?

How does deprivation influence secondary care costs after hip fracture?

作者信息

Glynn J, Hollingworth W, Bhimjiyani A, Ben-Shlomo Y, Gregson C L

机构信息

Health Economics at Bristol, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, 1-5 Whiteladies Road, Bristol, BS8 1NU, UK.

Musculoskeletal Research Unit, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

出版信息

Osteoporos Int. 2020 Aug;31(8):1573-1585. doi: 10.1007/s00198-020-05404-1. Epub 2020 Apr 2.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

We studied the association between deprivation and healthcare costs after hip fracture. Hospital costs in the year following hip fracture were £1120 higher for those living in more deprived areas. Most of this difference was explained by pre-existing health inequalities which should be targeted to reduce this disparity.

INTRODUCTION

To quantify differences in hospital costs following hip fracture between those living in higher and lower deprivation areas of England, we investigate pre- and post-fracture variables that explain the association.

METHODS

We used English Hospital Episodes Statistics linked to the National Hip Fracture Database (April 2011-March 2015) and national mortality data to identify patients admitted with hip fracture aged 60+ years. Hospital care was costed using 2017/2018 national reference costs, by index of multiple deprivation quintile. Three generalised linear model regressions estimated associations between deprivation and costs and the pre- and post-fracture variables that mediate this relationship.

RESULTS

Patients from the most deprived areas had higher hospital costs in the year post-fracture (£1,120; 95% CI £993 to £1,247) than those from the least deprived areas. If all patients could have incurred similar costs to those in the least deprived quintile, this would equate to an annual reduction in expenditure of £28.8 million. Pre-fracture characteristics, particularly comorbidities and anaesthetic risk grade, accounted for approximately 50% of the association between deprivation and costs. No evidence was found that post-fracture variables, such as transfer to a residential or nursing home, contributed to the association between deprivation and costs.

CONCLUSIONS

Socioeconomic inequalities are associated with substantial costs for the NHS after hip fracture. We did not identify post-fracture targets for intervention to reduce the impact of inequalities on post-fracture costs. The case for interventions to reduce comorbid conditions, improve health-related behaviours and prevent falls in deprived areas is clear but challenging to implement.

摘要

未标注

我们研究了髋部骨折后贫困与医疗费用之间的关联。居住在贫困程度较高地区的人在髋部骨折后的一年中,住院费用比其他人高出1120英镑。这种差异的大部分原因是先前存在的健康不平等,应针对这些不平等因素来减少这种差距。

引言

为了量化英格兰贫困程度较高和较低地区的人群在髋部骨折后住院费用的差异,我们调查了骨折前后的变量,以解释这种关联。

方法

我们使用与国家髋部骨折数据库相关联的英格兰医院事件统计数据(2011年4月 - 2015年3月)以及国家死亡率数据,来确定60岁及以上因髋部骨折入院的患者。使用2017/2018年国家参考成本,按多重贫困指数五分位数对医院护理费用进行核算。三次广义线性模型回归估计了贫困与费用之间的关联,以及介导这种关系的骨折前后变量。

结果

贫困程度最高地区的患者在骨折后一年的住院费用(1120英镑;95%置信区间为993英镑至1247英镑)高于贫困程度最低地区的患者。如果所有患者的费用都能与贫困程度最低五分位数的患者相似,这将相当于每年减少2880万英镑的支出。骨折前的特征,特别是合并症和麻醉风险等级,约占贫困与费用之间关联的50%。没有证据表明骨折后的变量,如转至养老院或疗养院,会导致贫困与费用之间的关联。

结论

社会经济不平等与国民保健制度在髋部骨折后产生的巨额费用相关。我们未确定可用于干预以减少不平等对骨折后费用影响的骨折后干预目标。在贫困地区减少合并症、改善与健康相关的行为以及预防跌倒的干预措施的必要性显而易见,但实施起来具有挑战性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验