Suppr超能文献

曼彻斯特分诊系统对急性冠状动脉综合征患者的评估。

Evaluation of the Manchester triage system for patients with acute coronary syndrome.

作者信息

Kiblboeck Daniel, Steinrueck Klara, Nitsche Christian, Lang Wolfgang, Kellermair Joerg, Blessberger Hermann, Steinwender Clemens, Siostrzonek Peter

机构信息

Department of Cardiology and Medical Intensive Care, Med Campus III, Kepler University Hospital, Medical Faculty of Johannes Kepler University, Krankenhausstraße 9, 4021, Linz, Austria.

Department of Internal Medicine II - Cardiology, Krankenhaus der Barmherzigen Schwestern, Linz, Austria.

出版信息

Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2020 Jun;132(11-12):277-282. doi: 10.1007/s00508-020-01632-x. Epub 2020 Apr 2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

An early diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is crucial for treatment and prognosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the Manchester triage system (MTS) for patients with ACS, e.g. ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (N-STEMI) and unstable angina pectoris (UAP).

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of patients diagnosed with ACS (STEMI, N‑STEMI and UAP) who were triaged in the emergency department (ED) with the MTS.

RESULTS

In this study 282 patients with ACS (STEMI: 34.0%, N‑STEMI: 61.7%, UAP: 4.3%) were triaged as MTS level 1 (immediate assessment): 0.4%, MTS level 2 (very urgent): 51.4%, MTS level 3 (urgent): 41.5%, MTS level 4 (standard): 6.7%, MTS level 5 (non-urgent): 0%. We observed significantly lower mean MTS levels in males (male: 2.48 ± 0.59, female: 2.68 ± 0.68, p = 0.02) and in patients younger than 80 years (age <80 years: 2.50 ± 0.61, age ≥80 years: 2.70 ± 0.67, p = 0.03). We did not find a significant difference of mean MTS levels in different types of ACS (STEMI: 2.46 ± 0.6, N‑STEMI: 2.59 ± 0.64, STEMI vs N‑STEMI: p = 0.11, UAP: 2.67 ± 0.65, STEMI vs UAP: p = 0.26) and with respect to diabetes (diabetic: 2.47 ± 0.57, non-diabetic: 2.58 ± 0.65, p = 0.13). The in-hospital mortality was 2.5% (MTS level 2: n = 3, MTS level 3: n = 3, MTS level 4: n = 1).

CONCLUSION

The majority of patients with ACS were classified as MTS levels 2 and 3. There was no significant difference of mean MTS levels in patients with STEMI, NSTEMI and UAP. In order to assure an early diagnosis of STEMI, an electrocardiogram (ECG) should be carried out immediately or at least within 10 min after first medical contact in the ED in all patients suspected for ACS, irrespective of the assigned MTS level.

摘要

背景

急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)的早期诊断对于治疗和预后至关重要。本研究的目的是评估曼彻斯特分诊系统(MTS)在ACS患者中的应用,例如ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)、非ST段抬高型心肌梗死(N-STEMI)和不稳定型心绞痛(UAP)。

方法

对在急诊科(ED)采用MTS进行分诊的确诊为ACS(STEMI、N-STEMI和UAP)的患者进行回顾性分析。

结果

在本研究中,282例ACS患者(STEMI:34.0%,N-STEMI:61.7%,UAP:4.3%)被分诊为MTS 1级(立即评估):0.4%,MTS 2级(非常紧急):51.4%,MTS 3级(紧急):41.5%,MTS 4级(标准):6.7%,MTS 5级(非紧急):0%。我们观察到男性(男性:2.48±0.59,女性:2.68±0.68,p = 0.02)和80岁以下患者(年龄<80岁:2.50±0.61,年龄≥80岁:2.70±0.67,p = 0.03)的平均MTS级别显著较低。我们未发现不同类型ACS(STEMI:2.46±0.6,N-STEMI:2.59±0.64,STEMI与N-STEMI比较:p = 0.11,UAP:2.67±0.65,STEMI与UAP比较:p = 0.26)以及糖尿病患者(糖尿病患者:2.47±0.57,非糖尿病患者:2.58±0.65,p = 0.13)的平均MTS级别存在显著差异。住院死亡率为2.5%(MTS 2级:n = 3,MTS 3级:n = 3,MTS 4级:n = 1)。

结论

大多数ACS患者被分类为MTS级别2和3。STEMI、NSTEMI和UAP患者的平均MTS级别无显著差异。为确保STEMI的早期诊断,对于所有疑似ACS的患者,无论其分配的MTS级别如何,均应在急诊科首次医疗接触后立即或至少在10分钟内进行心电图(ECG)检查。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b74e/7297858/b967f1c9a2c3/508_2020_1632_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验