Department of Legal and Forensic Medicine, University of Genova, via De' Toni 12, 16132, Genoa, Italy.
Centre universitaire romand de Médecine Légale, Rue Michel-Servet 1, 1206, Geneva, Chemin de la Vulliette 4, 1000, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Int J Legal Med. 2020 Sep;134(5):1733-1740. doi: 10.1007/s00414-020-02274-4. Epub 2020 Apr 2.
The diagnosis of drowning is considered one of the most difficult in forensic medicine. Due to the paucity of signs, it is a classical diagnosis by exclusion. For this reason, specific immunohistochemical markers would be useful. Far too little has been done to analyze in-depth the differences between SWD and FWD. We focused on the renal immunohistochemical expression of aquaporin 2, AVP, V2R, and renin in cases of drowning. This study has two purposes: (1) to better understand the differences between saltwater drowning (SWD) and freshwater drowning (FWD), which may indicate different pathophysiology and (2) to eventually identify markers useful for the diagnosis of drowning. We retrospectively investigated 10 cases of SWD gathered from the Institute of Legal Medicine in Genoa (Italy), and 10 cases of FWD from the University Center of Legal Medicine in Geneva (Switzerland). As a control group, we investigated 10 cases of death by gunshot to the head. A strong expression of AQP2 and AVP was significantly (p < 0.05) more evident in cases of SWD than in FWD and control cases. Regarding the V2R, no statistically significant differences were found between the studied groups. The renin tubular expression was particularly intense (p < 0.05) both in SWD and in FWD compared controls. According to our results, AQP2 and AVP represent potential useful markers for the differential diagnosis between SWD and other causes of death, including FWD. Renin may be a useful marker in the diagnosis of drowning but it does not allow for differentiation between FWD and SWD.
溺水的诊断被认为是法医学中最困难的诊断之一。由于体征很少,因此通常通过排除法进行诊断。出于这个原因,特异性免疫组化标志物将非常有用。目前为止,人们对盐水溺水 (SWD) 和淡水溺水 (FWD) 之间的差异进行深入分析的工作还远远不够。我们专注于研究溺水案例中肾组织中水通道蛋白 2 (AQP2)、血管加压素 (AVP)、V2R 和肾素的免疫组织化学表达。本研究有两个目的:(1) 更好地理解 SWD 和 FWD 之间的差异,这可能表明不同的病理生理学;(2) 最终确定有助于溺水诊断的标志物。我们回顾性研究了来自意大利热那亚法医研究所的 10 例 SWD 案例和来自瑞士日内瓦大学中心法医学的 10 例 FWD 案例。作为对照组,我们研究了 10 例头部枪击致死案例。SWD 案例中 AQP2 和 AVP 的表达明显 (p < 0.05) 强于 FWD 和对照组。至于 V2R,在所研究的组之间未发现统计学上的显著差异。与对照组相比,SWD 和 FWD 中的肾素管状表达特别强烈 (p < 0.05)。根据我们的结果,AQP2 和 AVP 代表了区分 SWD 和其他死因的潜在有用标志物,包括 FWD。肾素可能是溺水诊断的有用标志物,但它不能区分 FWD 和 SWD。