Faculty of Physical Culture, Palacký University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Institute for Health and Sport, Victoria University, Melbourne, Australia.
BMC Pediatr. 2020 Apr 2;20(1):147. doi: 10.1186/s12887-020-02036-6.
Between-person differences in sedentary patterns should be considered to understand the role of sedentary behavior (SB) in the development of childhood obesity. This study took a novel approach based on compositional data analysis to examine associations between SB patterns and adiposity and investigate differences in adiposity associated with time reallocation between time spent in sedentary bouts of different duration and physical activity.
An analysis of cross-sectional data was performed in 425 children aged 7-12 years (58% girls). Waking behaviors were assessed using ActiGraph GT3X accelerometer for seven consecutive days. Multi-frequency bioimpedance measurement was used to determine adiposity. Compositional regression models with robust estimators were used to analyze associations between sedentary patterns and adiposity markers. To examine differences in adiposity associated with time reallocation, we used the compositional isotemporal substitution model.
Significantly higher fat mass percentage (FM%; β = 0.18; 95% CI: 0.01, 0.34; p = 0.040) and visceral adipose tissue (VAT; β = 0.37; 95% CI: 0.03, 0.71; p = 0.034) were associated with time spent in middle sedentary bouts in duration of 10-29 min (relative to remaining behaviors). No significant associations were found for short (< 10 min) and long sedentary bouts (≥30 min). Substituting the time spent in total SB with moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) was associated with a decrease in VAT. Substituting 1 h/week of the time spent in middle sedentary bouts with MVPA was associated with 2.9% (95% CI: 1.2, 4.6), 3.4% (95% CI: 1.2, 5.5), and 6.1% (95% CI: 2.9, 9.2) lower FM%, fat mass index, and VAT, respectively. Moreover, substituting 2 h/week of time spent in middle sedentary bouts with short sedentary bouts was associated with 3.5% (95% CI: 0.02, 6.9) lower FM%.
Our findings suggest that adiposity status could be improved by increasing MVPA at the expense of time spent in middle sedentary bouts. Some benefits to adiposity may also be expected from replacing middle sedentary bouts with short sedentary bouts, that is, by taking standing or activity breaks more often. These findings may help design more effective interventions to prevent and control childhood obesity.
为了了解久坐行为在儿童肥胖发展中的作用,应考虑个体间的久坐模式差异。本研究采用基于成分数据分析的新方法,检验久坐行为模式与肥胖的相关性,并探讨与久坐时间在不同持续时间的久坐段和身体活动之间重新分配相关的肥胖差异。
对 425 名 7-12 岁儿童(58%为女孩)进行横断面数据分析。使用 ActiGraph GT3X 加速度计连续 7 天评估清醒行为。使用多频生物阻抗测量法确定肥胖程度。使用稳健估计的成分回归模型分析久坐模式与肥胖标志物之间的相关性。为了研究与久坐时间重新分配相关的肥胖差异,我们使用成分等时替代模型。
与剩余行为相比,中时长(10-29 分钟)的久坐时间与更高的体脂肪百分比(FM%;β=0.18;95%置信区间:0.01,0.34;p=0.040)和内脏脂肪组织(VAT;β=0.37;95%置信区间:0.03,0.71;p=0.034)相关。与短时长(<10 分钟)和长时长(≥30 分钟)的久坐时间没有显著相关性。用中强度到高强度身体活动(MVPA)代替总 SB 时间与 VAT 降低相关。用每周 1 小时中时长久坐时间替代 MVPA 分别与 FM%降低 2.9%(95%置信区间:1.2,4.6)、脂肪质量指数降低 3.4%(95%置信区间:1.2,5.5)和 VAT 降低 6.1%(95%置信区间:2.9,9.2)相关。此外,用每周 2 小时中时长久坐时间替代短时长久坐时间与 FM%降低 3.5%(95%置信区间:0.02,6.9)相关。
我们的研究结果表明,通过增加 MVPA 以减少中时长久坐时间,可以改善肥胖状况。用短时长久坐时间替代中时长久坐时间也可能对肥胖产生一些益处,即更频繁地站立或活动休息。这些发现可能有助于设计更有效的干预措施,以预防和控制儿童肥胖。