Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, Guangdong, China.
Eur Radiol. 2020 Aug;30(8):4606-4614. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-06802-z. Epub 2020 Apr 2.
To comprehensively assess the diagnostic performance of Vesical Imaging-Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS) score for detecting the muscle invasion of bladder cancer.
PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase were searched up to November 20, 2019. QUADAS-2 tool assessed the quality of included studies. The diagnostic estimates including sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and the area under the curve (AUC) of hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) were calculated. Further subgroup analysis, meta-regression and sensitivity analysis were conducted.
Six studies with 1064 patients were finally included. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUC value were 0.90 (95% CI 0.86-0.94), 0.86 (95% CI 0.71-0.94), and 0.93 (95% CI 0.91-0.95) for VI-RADS 3 as the cutoff value. The corresponding estimates were 0.77 (95% CI 0.65-0.86), 0.97 (95% CI 0.88-0.99), and 0.92 (95% CI 0.89-0.94) for VI-RADS 4 as the cutoff value. Meta-regression analysis revealed that study design (p value 0.01) and surgical pattern of reference standard (p value 0.02) were source of the heterogeneity of pooled sensitivity. No publication bias was observed.
The VI-RADS score can provide a good predictive ability for detecting the muscle invasiveness of primary bladder cancer with VI-RADS 3 or VI-RADS 4 as the cutoff value.
• VI-RADS score has high sensitivity and specificity for predicting muscle invasion. • The diagnostic efficiencies of VI-RADS 3 and VI-RADS 4 as the cutoff value are similar. • VI-RADS score could be used for detecting muscle invasion of bladder cancer in clinical practice.
全面评估膀胱影像报告和数据系统(VI-RADS)评分诊断膀胱癌肌层浸润的性能。
检索PubMed、Web of Science 和 Embase 数据库,检索时间截至 2019 年 11 月 20 日。使用 QUADAS-2 工具评价纳入研究的质量。计算诊断评估指标,包括汇总敏感性、特异性、阳性似然比、阴性似然比和分层综合受试者工作特征(HSROC)曲线下面积(AUC)。进一步进行亚组分析、Meta 回归和敏感性分析。
最终纳入 6 项研究共 1064 例患者。当 VI-RADS 3 作为截断值时,汇总敏感性、特异性和 AUC 值分别为 0.90(95%CI 0.86-0.94)、0.86(95%CI 0.71-0.94)和 0.93(95%CI 0.91-0.95)。当 VI-RADS 4 作为截断值时,相应的估计值分别为 0.77(95%CI 0.65-0.86)、0.97(95%CI 0.88-0.99)和 0.92(95%CI 0.89-0.94)。Meta 回归分析显示,研究设计(p 值 0.01)和参考标准的手术模式(p 值 0.02)是汇总敏感性异质性的来源。未发现发表偏倚。
VI-RADS 评分可以为预测原发性膀胱癌的肌层浸润提供良好的预测能力,以 VI-RADS 3 或 VI-RADS 4 作为截断值。
• VI-RADS 评分对预测肌层浸润具有较高的敏感性和特异性。
• VI-RADS 3 和 VI-RADS 4 作为截断值的诊断效率相当。
• VI-RADS 评分可用于临床检测膀胱癌的肌层浸润。