Section of Nephrology and Hypertension, 1st Department of Medicine, AHEPA Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Department of Nephrology, School of Medicine, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece.
Curr Vasc Pharmacol. 2021;19(1):4-11. doi: 10.2174/1570161118666200403142451.
Among patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), arterial stiffness is considered as a powerful predictor of cardiovascular (CV) morbidity and mortality. However, the relevance of aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV) as a prognostic biomarker for CV risk estimation is not yet fully clear.
We performed a systematic search of Medline/PubMed database from inception through August 21, 2019 to identify observational cohort studies conducted in ESKD patients and exploring the association of PWV with CV events and mortality.
Whereas "historical" cohort studies showed aortic PWV to be associated with higher risk of CV and all-cause mortality, recent studies failed to reproduce the independent predictive value of aortic PWV in older ESKD patients. Studies using state-of-the-art prognostic tests showed that the addition of aortic PWV to standard clinical risk scores could only modestly improve CV risk reclassification. Studies associating improvement in PWV in response to blood pressure (BP)-lowering with improvement in survival cannot demonstrate direct cause-and-effect associations due to their observational design and absence of accurate methodology to assess the BP burden.
Despite the strong pathophysiological relevance of arterial stiffness as a mediator of CV disease in ESKD, the assessment of aortic PWV for CV risk stratification in this population appears to be of limited value. Whether aortic PWV assessment is valuable in guiding CV risk factor management and whether such a therapeutic approach is translated into improvement in clinical outcomes, is an issue of clinical relevance that warrants investigation in properly-designed randomized trials.
在终末期肾病(ESKD)患者中,动脉僵硬被认为是心血管(CV)发病率和死亡率的有力预测指标。然而,主动脉脉搏波速度(PWV)作为 CV 风险估计的预后生物标志物的相关性尚不完全清楚。
我们对 Medline/PubMed 数据库进行了系统检索,检索时间从建立到 2019 年 8 月 21 日,以确定在 ESKD 患者中进行的观察性队列研究,并探讨 PWV 与 CV 事件和死亡率的关系。
虽然“历史”队列研究表明主动脉 PWV 与更高的 CV 和全因死亡率风险相关,但最近的研究未能重现主动脉 PWV 在老年 ESKD 患者中独立预测价值。使用最新预后测试的研究表明,将主动脉 PWV 加入标准临床风险评分仅能适度改善 CV 风险再分类。将 PWV 改善与降压后生存改善相关的研究由于其观察性设计和缺乏准确评估 BP 负担的方法,不能证明直接的因果关系。
尽管动脉僵硬作为 ESKD 中 CV 疾病的中介物具有很强的病理生理学相关性,但在该人群中,主动脉 PWV 评估用于 CV 风险分层的价值似乎有限。主动脉 PWV 评估是否有助于指导 CV 危险因素管理,以及这种治疗方法是否转化为临床结局的改善,是一个具有临床意义的问题,需要在适当设计的随机试验中进行研究。