文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

制定和验证现场医疗急救员表现评估的内容领域:一项焦点小组和德尔菲法研究

Development and Validation of Content Domains for Paramedic Prehospital Performance Assessment: A Focus Group and Delphi Method Approach.

出版信息

Prehosp Emerg Care. 2021 Mar-Apr;25(2):196-204. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2020.1750743. Epub 2020 May 1.


DOI:10.1080/10903127.2020.1750743
PMID:32243208
Abstract

The chaotic and complex nature of delivering patient care in the prehospital setting complicates the provision of real-time formative feedback to paramedic students. Although the use of simulations is widespread in emergency medical services (EMS) education, a high degree of variability precludes consistent performance assessment in EMS. The objective of this study was to define and validate key domains required to evaluate paramedic prehospital performance. We conducted a two-phase study that combined focus group and Delphi methodology. Participants were purposefully selected to attain diverse panels regarding sex, race, ethnicity, professional roles, levels of education, geographical area, and experience as a paramedic and educator. In Phase I, a panel of 11 subject matter experts (SMEs) were tasked with identifying the essential domains to be evaluated in a paramedic performance assessment. In Phase II, another panel of 11 SMEs and a four-round modified Delphi method with 28 paramedic program directors were used to validate the domains identified in Phase I. The first focus group identified and achieved consensus on five domains: (1) effective communication, (2) scene management, (3) patient assessment, (4) patient management, and (5) professional behavior. These domains were validated by the second focus group. The first round of the Delphi process generated 64 content domains, which were reduced to nine unique content domains via thematic analysis. These nine content domains fit well within the broader domains identified by the focus groups with one specific area, critical thinking and reasoning, being listed in two key areas based on the definitions of the focus group domains of patient assessment and patient management. The content domains identified in this study provide EMS educators a theoretical framework for designing the performance assessment of newly trained professionals in the prehospital setting.

摘要

在院前环境中提供患者护理的混乱和复杂性质使向护理人员学生提供实时形成性反馈变得复杂。尽管模拟在紧急医疗服务(EMS)教育中广泛使用,但高度的可变性排除了在 EMS 中进行一致的绩效评估。本研究的目的是定义和验证评估护理人员院前表现所需的关键领域。我们进行了一项两阶段的研究,结合了焦点小组和 Delphi 方法。参与者是有目的地选择的,以获得关于性别、种族、民族、专业角色、教育水平、地理区域以及作为护理人员和教育者的经验的不同小组。在第一阶段,一个由 11 名主题专家(SME)组成的小组负责确定在护理人员绩效评估中要评估的基本领域。在第二阶段,另一个由 11 名 SME 和 28 名护理计划主任组成的四轮修改后的 Delphi 方法用于验证第一阶段确定的领域。第一组重点小组确定并达成共识的五个领域为:(1)有效沟通,(2)现场管理,(3)患者评估,(4)患者管理和(5)专业行为。这五个领域得到了第二组重点小组的验证。德尔福法第一轮生成了 64 个内容领域,通过主题分析将其减少到九个独特的内容领域。这九个内容领域与焦点小组确定的更广泛领域非常吻合,其中一个特定领域,即批判性思维和推理,根据焦点小组患者评估和患者管理领域的定义,被列为两个关键领域之一。本研究中确定的内容领域为 EMS 教育者提供了一个理论框架,用于设计新培训的专业人员在院前环境中的绩效评估。

相似文献

[1]
Development and Validation of Content Domains for Paramedic Prehospital Performance Assessment: A Focus Group and Delphi Method Approach.

Prehosp Emerg Care. 2021

[2]
Medical Oversight, Educational Core Content, and Proposed Scopes of Practice of Wilderness EMS Providers: A Joint Project Developed by Wilderness EMS Educators, Medical Directors, and Regulators Using a Delphi Approach.

Prehosp Emerg Care. 2017-6-28

[3]
Modified Delphi Method Derivation of the FAMILY (Family Assessment of Medical Interventions & Liaisons with the Young) EMS Instrument.

Prehosp Emerg Care. 2021

[4]
Children's safety initiative: a national assessment of pediatric educational needs among emergency medical services providers.

Prehosp Emerg Care. 2015

[5]
Examining consensus for a standardised patient assessment in community paramedicine home visits: a RAND/UCLA-modified Delphi Study.

BMJ Open. 2019-10-7

[6]
Defining two novel sub models of the Anglo-American paramedic system: A Delphi study.

Australas Emerg Care. 2022-9

[7]
Methods and Implementation of the 2019 EMS Practice Analysis.

Prehosp Emerg Care. 2022

[8]
Paramedic clinical decision making during high acuity emergency calls: design and methodology of a Delphi study.

BMC Emerg Med. 2009-9-21

[9]
Using a Journal Club Series to Introduce Paramedic Students to Research Fundamentals and Critical Appraisal of Medical Literature.

Prehosp Disaster Med. 2019-7-19

[10]
Creation and Delphi-method refinement of pediatric disaster triage simulations.

Prehosp Emerg Care. 2014

引用本文的文献

[1]
Perceptions of paramedic educators on assessments used in the first year of a paramedic programme: a qualitative exploration.

BMC Med Educ. 2023-12-12

[2]
Emergency medical services education research priorities during COVID-19: A modified Delphi study.

J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2021-8-21

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索