Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
The Ontario Community Paramedicine Secretariat, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
BMJ Open. 2019 Oct 7;9(10):e031956. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031956.
Community paramedicine programme are often designed to address repeated and non-urgent use of paramedic services by providing patients with alternatives to the traditional 'treat and transport' ambulance model of care. We sought to investigate the level of consensus that could be found by a panel of experts regarding appropriate health, social and environmental domains that should be assessed in community paramedicine home visit programme.
We applied the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method in a modified Delphi method to investigate the level of consensus on assessment domains for use in community paramedicine home visit programme.
We included a multi-national panel of 17 experts on community paramedicine and in-home assessment from multiple settings (paramedicine, primary care, mental health, home and community care, geriatric care).
A list of potential assessment categories was established after a targeted literature review and confirmed by panel members. Over multiple rounds, panel members scored the appropriateness of 48 assessment domains on a Likert scale from 0 (not appropriate) to 5 (very appropriate). Scores were then reviewed at an in-person meeting and a finalised list of assessment domains was generated.
After the preliminary round of scoring, all 48 assessment domains had scores that demonstrated consensus. Nine assessment domains (18.8%) demonstrated a wider range of rated appropriateness. No domains were found to be not appropriate. Achieving consensus about the appropriateness of assessment domains on the first round of scoring negated the need for subsequent rounds of scoring. The in-person meeting resulted in re-grouping assessment domains and adding an additional domain about urinary continence.
An international panel of experts with knowledge about in-home assessment by community paramedics demonstrated a high level of agreement on appropriate patient assessment domains for community paramedicine home visit programme. Community paramedicine home visit programme are likely to have similar patient populations. A standardised assessment instrument may be viable in multiple settings.
社区急救医学计划通常旨在通过为患者提供传统“治疗和转运”急救模式的替代方案,来解决急救服务的重复和非紧急使用问题。我们旨在调查专家小组在社区急救医学家庭访视计划中应评估的适当健康、社会和环境领域方面所能达成的共识程度。
我们应用 RAND/UCLA 适宜性方法,采用改良德尔菲法,调查社区急救医学家庭访视计划中使用的评估领域的共识水平。
我们纳入了来自多个环境(急救医学、初级保健、心理健康、家庭和社区护理、老年护理)的 17 名社区急救医学和家庭评估专家的多国家小组。
在目标文献综述后确定了潜在评估类别列表,并由小组委员确认。在多个轮次中,小组委员对 48 个评估领域的适宜性进行了 0(不适当)到 5(非常适当)的李克特量表评分。然后在现场会议上审查评分,并生成最终的评估领域列表。
在初步评分轮次后,所有 48 个评估领域的评分都显示出共识。9 个评估领域(18.8%)的评分范围更广。没有发现不适当的领域。在第一轮评分中达成评估领域适宜性的共识,否定了后续评分轮次的必要性。现场会议导致重新分组评估领域,并增加了一个关于尿失禁的额外领域。
具有社区急救人员家庭评估知识的国际专家小组在社区急救医学家庭访视计划中适当的患者评估领域方面表现出高度一致。社区急救医学家庭访视计划可能具有类似的患者群体。在多个环境中,标准化评估工具可能是可行的。