护理教育中模拟有效性工具的验证。
Validation of the Simulation Effectiveness Tool in Nursing Education.
出版信息
J Nurs Educ. 2020 Apr 1;59(4):186-193. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20200323-03.
BACKGROUND
The Simulation Effectiveness Tool (SET) frequently is used to assess perceived learning and confidence in simulation. However, few studies have reported the validity of the tool. This study assessed the reliability and validity of the SET.
METHOD
This retrospective analysis evaluated the tool using 568 cases conducted at three nursing schools.
RESULTS
A two-factor model showed reasonable fit indices. The fit statistics for the two-factor structure were: χ, 152.98 (df = 53, p < .001); comparative fit index, 0.94; root mean square error of approximation, 0.05 (range, 0.04 to 0.06); and standardized root mean square residual, 0.04. In addition, weak convergence was identified between the confidence in the SET and responding in the Lasater rubric.
CONCLUSION
The psychometric properties of the study indicate the SET has demonstrated acceptable evidence of validity and reliability to measure simulation effectiveness in Korean nursing students. The use of this instrument for brief simulation education is recommended. [J Nurs Educ. 2020;59(4):186-193.].
背景
模拟效果工具（SET）常用于评估模拟中的感知学习和信心。然而，很少有研究报告该工具的有效性。本研究评估了 SET 的可靠性和有效性。
方法
本回顾性分析使用三所护理学校的 568 个案例对该工具进行了评估。
结果
双因素模型显示出合理的拟合指数。双因素结构的拟合统计数据为：χ，152.98（df = 53，p <.001）；比较拟合指数，0.94；均方根误差近似值，0.05（范围，0.04 至 0.06）；标准化均方根残差，0.04。此外，SET 的置信度与 Lasater 量表中的反应之间存在弱收敛。
结论
研究的心理测量特性表明，SET 已经证明了在韩国护理学生中测量模拟效果的有效性和可靠性的可接受证据。建议在简短的模拟教育中使用该工具。[J Nurs Educ. 2020;59(4):186-193. ]。
Zotero 插件