一项用于识别区分缺血性与非缺血性心力衰竭的病理生理途径的网络分析。
A network analysis to identify pathophysiological pathways distinguishing ischaemic from non-ischaemic heart failure.
作者信息
Sama Iziah E, Woolley Rebecca J, Nauta Jan F, Romaine Simon P R, Tromp Jasper, Ter Maaten Jozine M, van der Meer Peter, Lam Carolyn S P, Samani Nilesh J, Ng Leong L, Metra Marco, Dickstein Kenneth, Anker Stefan D, Zannad Faiez, Lang Chim C, Cleland John G F, van Veldhuisen Dirk J, Hillege Hans L, Voors Adriaan A
机构信息
Department of Cardiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Glenfield Hospital, and NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Leicester, UK.
出版信息
Eur J Heart Fail. 2020 May;22(5):821-833. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.1811. Epub 2020 Apr 3.
AIMS
Heart failure (HF) is frequently caused by an ischaemic event (e.g. myocardial infarction) but might also be caused by a primary disease of the myocardium (cardiomyopathy). In order to identify targeted therapies specific for either ischaemic or non-ischaemic HF, it is important to better understand differences in underlying molecular mechanisms.
METHODS AND RESULTS
We performed a biological physical protein-protein interaction network analysis to identify pathophysiological pathways distinguishing ischaemic from non-ischaemic HF. First, differentially expressed plasma protein biomarkers were identified in 1160 patients enrolled in the BIOSTAT-CHF study, 715 of whom had ischaemic HF and 445 had non-ischaemic HF. Second, we constructed an enriched physical protein-protein interaction network, followed by a pathway over-representation analysis. Finally, we identified key network proteins. Data were validated in an independent HF cohort comprised of 765 ischaemic and 100 non-ischaemic HF patients. We found 21/92 proteins to be up-regulated and 2/92 down-regulated in ischaemic relative to non-ischaemic HF patients. An enriched network of 18 proteins that were specific for ischaemic heart disease yielded six pathways, which are related to inflammation, endothelial dysfunction superoxide production, coagulation, and atherosclerosis. We identified five key network proteins: acid phosphatase 5, epidermal growth factor receptor, insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1, plasminogen activator urokinase receptor, and secreted phosphoprotein 1. Similar results were observed in the independent validation cohort.
CONCLUSIONS
Pathophysiological pathways distinguishing patients with ischaemic HF from those with non-ischaemic HF were related to inflammation, endothelial dysfunction superoxide production, coagulation, and atherosclerosis. The five key pathway proteins identified are potential treatment targets specifically for patients with ischaemic HF.
目的
心力衰竭(HF)常由缺血性事件(如心肌梗死)引起,但也可能由心肌原发性疾病(心肌病)导致。为了确定针对缺血性或非缺血性HF的靶向治疗方法,更好地了解潜在分子机制的差异很重要。
方法与结果
我们进行了生物物理蛋白质 - 蛋白质相互作用网络分析,以识别区分缺血性和非缺血性HF的病理生理途径。首先,在参加BIOSTAT-CHF研究的1160名患者中鉴定差异表达的血浆蛋白质生物标志物,其中715例患有缺血性HF,445例患有非缺血性HF。其次,我们构建了一个富集的物理蛋白质 - 蛋白质相互作用网络,随后进行通路过度表达分析。最后,我们鉴定了关键网络蛋白。数据在由765例缺血性和100例非缺血性HF患者组成的独立HF队列中得到验证。我们发现,相对于非缺血性HF患者,缺血性HF患者中有21/92种蛋白质上调,2/92种蛋白质下调。一个由18种缺血性心脏病特异性蛋白质组成的富集网络产生了6条通路,这些通路与炎症、内皮功能障碍、超氧化物产生、凝血和动脉粥样硬化有关。我们鉴定了5种关键网络蛋白:酸性磷酸酶5、表皮生长因子受体、胰岛素样生长因子结合蛋白-1、纤溶酶原激活物尿激酶受体和分泌性磷蛋白1。在独立验证队列中观察到了类似结果。
结论
区分缺血性HF患者和非缺血性HF患者的病理生理途径与炎症、内皮功能障碍、超氧化物产生、凝血和动脉粥样硬化有关。鉴定出的5种关键通路蛋白是缺血性HF患者的潜在治疗靶点。