Suppr超能文献

在普遍福利国家中使用长期护理服务 - 论移民年龄的重要性。

Use of long-term care services in a universal welfare state - On the importance of age at migration.

机构信息

University of Gothenburg, Department of Social Work, Sprängkullsgatan 23-25, PO Box 720, SE 405 30, Gothenburg, Sweden; University of Gothenburg Centre for Ageing and Health (Age Cap), Sweden Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Wallinsgatan 6, SE 431 41, Mölndal, Sweden.

出版信息

Soc Sci Med. 2020 May;252:112923. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112923. Epub 2020 Mar 19.

Abstract

There is broad agreement in the international literature that there are significant barriers to the use of long-term care services (LTCS) by older migrants in various contexts. However, there is a lack of comprehensive study in this area, and particularly concerning the diversity of migrants from different sending countries and the heterogeneity of their migration trajectories concerning the age at migration. Barriers to the use of care might be intensified for persons migrating at an older age, resulting in lower use of care. However, it is still unknown whether late-in-life migrants are underrepresented as users of LTCS in comparison to Swedish born and migrants arriving at younger ages. We study the likelihood of using any (1) LTCS, (2) residential care, and (3) personal and domestic care among older foreign-born, compared to Swedish-born older persons. Secondly, we study the likelihood of care across different birth countries compared to older persons born in Sweden. Thirdly, we investigate the likelihood of LTCS among migrants arriving at different ages. The total population of all persons 65 years and over in Sweden, is studied using register data with almost two million observations. The central findings of this study show that there is substantial heterogeneity across and within different birth countries regarding utilization of LTCS, residential care and personal and domestic care. The results from this study also suggest that late in life migration does not have to imply lower utilization of LTCS, residential care and personal, and domestic care. However, results show a slight over-representation of personal and domestic care among those who have migrated later in life. Further, there is an under-representation of residential care among late-in-life migrants. Our findings thus suggest that caution is needed when generalizing about levels of formal care use in migrant populations.

摘要

国际文献广泛认为,在不同背景下,老年移民在使用长期护理服务(LTCS)方面存在重大障碍。然而,在这一领域缺乏全面的研究,特别是关于来自不同原籍国的移民的多样性及其与移民年龄相关的迁移轨迹的异质性。对于年龄较大的移民来说,使用护理的障碍可能会加剧,导致护理的使用减少。然而,尚不清楚与瑞典出生的移民和年龄较小的移民相比,晚年移民是否在 LTCS 的使用者中代表性不足。我们研究了与瑞典出生的老年人相比,老年外国出生者(1)使用任何 LTCS、(2)使用居住护理、(3)使用个人和家庭护理的可能性。其次,我们研究了与瑞典出生者相比,不同出生国家的老年人获得护理的可能性。第三,我们调查了不同年龄到达的移民获得 LTCS 的可能性。本研究使用登记数据研究了所有在瑞典年满 65 岁及以上的人的总人口,共有近两百万个观察值。这项研究的主要发现表明,在使用 LTCS、居住护理和个人及家庭护理方面,不同出生国家之间以及内部存在着实质性的异质性。这项研究的结果还表明,晚年移民不一定意味着 LTCS、居住护理和个人及家庭护理的利用率较低。然而,结果表明,那些晚年移民的个人和家庭护理的比例略高。此外,晚年移民的居住护理比例较低。因此,我们的研究结果表明,在概括移民群体中正式护理使用水平时需要谨慎。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验