Kuźniacka Joanna, Hejdysz Marcin, Banaszak Mirosław, Biesek Jakub, Kaczmarek Sebastian, Grabowicz Małgorzata, Rutkowski Andrzej, Adamski Marek
Department of Animal Breeding, Faculty of Animal Breeding and Biology, UTP - University of Science and Technology in Bydgoszcz, Mazowiecka 28, 85-084 Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Department of Animal Breeding and Product Quality Assessment, UP Poznań University of Life Sciences, Wołyńska 33, 60-637 Poznań, Poland.
Animals (Basel). 2020 Mar 20;10(3):519. doi: 10.3390/ani10030519.
The aim of the study was to analyze the quality of geese meat receiving feed with soybean meal (group 1), yellow lupin (group 2), narrow-leaved lupin (group 3), or white lupin (group 4). In total, 400 male White Kołuda geese were randomly assigned to four groups, with 10 replicates and 10 birds each, during the 77-day rearing period. After the end of the rearing period, 10 birds from each group were slaughtered and dissected. Meat quality traits were measured. Based on the production results, it can be concluded that geese use fodder with yellow and white lupin to the same degree as in the case of the control group and higher body weight gain was recorded in the first rearing period. In contrast, the use of narrow-leaved lupin in mixtures for geese worsened the feed used. Meat traits were similar in all groups, including the content of muscles and fat in the carcass ( > 0.05), excluding abdominal fat. The weight of abdominal fat and its proportion in the carcass were higher ( < 0.05) in geese from group 4. A higher ( < 0.05) pH was found in group 1. The protein and intramuscular fat content in breast muscles was highest ( < 0.05) in geese from group 4, and a higher water content was found in group 1. The protein content in leg muscles was higher in group 3, and the fat content was higher in group 4 ( < 0.05). The color and water-holding capacity of meat were comparable in all groups ( > 0.05). The analysis revealed a positive effect of replacing soybean meal with alternative protein sources, especially yellow and white lupin, on the growth performance and quality of goose meat.
本研究的目的是分析食用含豆粕饲料(第1组)、黄羽扇豆饲料(第2组)、窄叶羽扇豆饲料(第3组)或白羽扇豆饲料(第4组)的鹅肉品质。在77天的饲养期内,总共400只雄性白科卢达鹅被随机分为四组,每组10个重复,每组10只鹅。饲养期结束后,每组宰杀10只鹅并进行解剖,测量肉品质性状。根据生产结果可以得出结论,鹅对黄羽扇豆和白羽扇豆饲料的利用程度与对照组相同,并且在第一个饲养期内记录到更高的体重增加。相比之下,在鹅的混合饲料中使用窄叶羽扇豆会使所用饲料变差。所有组的肉品质性状相似,包括胴体中的肌肉和脂肪含量(>0.05),但腹部脂肪除外。第4组鹅的腹部脂肪重量及其在胴体中的比例更高(<0.05)。第1组的pH值更高(<0.05)。第4组鹅胸肌中的蛋白质和肌内脂肪含量最高(<0.05),第1组的水分含量更高。第3组腿肌中的蛋白质含量更高,第4组的脂肪含量更高(<0.05)。所有组肉的颜色和持水能力相当(>0.05)。分析表明,用替代蛋白质来源,尤其是黄羽扇豆和白羽扇豆替代豆粕,对鹅肉的生长性能和品质有积极影响。