Reni L, Ratto S, Abbruzzese G, Abbruzzese M, Favale E
Department of Neurology, University of Genova, Italy.
Exp Brain Res. 1988;72(2):305-15. doi: 10.1007/BF00250253.
The possible contribution of low threshold muscle afferents to the postsynaptic component (N13) of the cervical response evoked by electrical stimulation of the median nerve (MN) was investigated in normal subjects. Electroneurographic (ENG) and electromyographic (EMG) correlates of the reflex motoneuronal discharge (RMND) were recorded simultaneously. A. No reflex activity could be elicited by stimulation of the MN at the wrist, at least in the resting subjects, while well developed ENG (P2 efferent volley) and EMG (H reflex) monosynaptic responses occurred following stimulation of the MN at the elbow at suitable strengths. In neither case could a surface correlate of interneuronal activity evoked by muscle afferents be demonstrated. B. Recruitment curves showed that at stimulus intensities above maximal for the H reflex both P2 and H responses started to decrease until they completely disappeared, while N13 showed further enhancement. C. Subthreshold conditioning stimulation of the MN enhanced both P2 and H responses, while vibratory muscle stimuli provoked a clearcut suppression of these two responses. In contrast, N13 was completely unaffected by either manoeuvre. D. No cervical evoked activity could be detected following tendon tapping of the anterior forearm muscles in spite of the appearance of well developed cortical responses and the ENG and EMG correlates of the T reflex. E. Conditioning volleys elicited by tendon taps of the anterior forearm muscles suppressed both P2 and H responses following stimulation of the MN at the elbow without affecting the related N13 component. Conditioning supramaximal stimulation of the MN at the wrist suppressed the N13 component of the cervical response evoked by stimulation of the MN at the elbow without affecting the related reflex responses. No component chronologically related to the RMND could be recorded at the posterior neck region during suppression of N13, thus ruling out the possibility that failure to detect the RMND (as well as its interneuronal concomitants) with cervical electrodes is due to a masking effect of the N13 component. G. Conditioning tendon taps of anterior forearm muscles provoked a clearcut reduction of the primary cortical response to finger stimulation without affecting the postsynaptic component of the related cervical response. It is concluded that neither segmental (motoneuronal or interneuronal in origin) nor ascending postsynaptic impulses generated in the spinal cord by stimulation of low threshold muscle afferents contribute to N13, the latter being probably due to activation of both short and long axoned spinal neurons by cutaneous afferents.
在正常受试者中,研究了低阈值肌肉传入神经对正中神经(MN)电刺激诱发的颈部反应的突触后成分(N13)的可能贡献。同时记录了反射运动神经元放电(RMND)的神经电图(ENG)和肌电图(EMG)相关性。A. 至少在静息受试者中,腕部刺激MN不能诱发反射活动,而在肘部以适当强度刺激MN后,可出现良好的ENG(P2传出波)和EMG(H反射)单突触反应。在这两种情况下,均未显示出肌肉传入神经诱发的中间神经元活动的表面相关性。B. 募集曲线显示,在高于H反射最大值的刺激强度下,P2和H反应均开始下降,直至完全消失,而N13则进一步增强。C. MN的阈下条件刺激增强了P2和H反应,而振动肌肉刺激则明显抑制了这两种反应。相比之下,N13不受任何一种操作的影响。D. 尽管出现了良好的皮质反应以及T反射的ENG和EMG相关性,但在前臂肌肉进行肌腱叩击后,未检测到颈部诱发活动。E. 前臂肌肉肌腱叩击诱发的条件波抑制了肘部刺激MN后的P2和H反应,而不影响相关的N13成分。腕部对MN进行阈上条件刺激抑制了肘部刺激MN诱发的颈部反应的N13成分,而不影响相关的反射反应。在抑制N13期间,在后颈部区域未记录到与RMND时间相关的成分,因此排除了用颈部电极未能检测到RMND(及其中间神经元伴随成分)是由于N13成分的掩盖效应的可能性。G. 前臂肌肉的条件性肌腱叩击明显降低了对手指刺激的初级皮质反应,而不影响相关颈部反应的突触后成分。结论是,低阈值肌肉传入神经刺激在脊髓中产生的节段性(起源于运动神经元或中间神经元)和上行突触后冲动均对N13无贡献,后者可能是由于皮肤传入神经激活了短轴突和长轴突脊髓神经元所致。