Leandri M, Favale E, Ratto S, Abbruzzese M
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1981 Aug;44(8):718-22. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.44.8.718.
Cervical responses evoked by stimulation of the median nerve have been concurrently recorded from C7--Fz and C7--Sn (suprasternal notch). The existence of two different waveforms (RI and RII) has been confirmed. RI (from C7--Fz) consists of four negative peaks (N9, N11, N13, N14) followed by a large positive deflection (P16). RII (from C7--Sn) is characterised by an early positive--negative spike (P1--N1a) followed by a slow negative--positive wave (N1b--P2). The study of the most relevant parameters (polarity, latency and refractory period) of each component of RI and RII did not indicate whether the generators underlying RI differ from those responsible for RII. However, stimulation of the lower limb, which does not involve segmental events at cervical level, showed a clearcut difference: no response was recorded from C7--Sn, while evoked activity equivalent to RI was obtained from C7--Fz. Therefore it is suggested that RII is entirely generated by segmentally evoked potentials while RI is mainly due to conducted potentials.
通过刺激正中神经诱发的颈部反应已同时从C7 - Fz和C7 - Sn(胸骨上切迹)记录下来。已证实存在两种不同的波形(RI和RII)。RI(来自C7 - Fz)由四个负峰(N9、N11、N13、N14)组成,随后是一个大的正偏转(P16)。RII(来自C7 - Sn)的特征是一个早期的正 - 负尖峰(P1 - N1a),随后是一个缓慢的负 - 正波(N1b - P2)。对RI和RII各成分的最相关参数(极性、潜伏期和不应期)的研究并未表明RI的产生源是否与RII的产生源不同。然而,刺激下肢(不涉及颈部水平的节段性事件)显示出明显差异:从C7 - Sn未记录到反应,而从C7 - Fz获得了等同于RI的诱发活动。因此,有人提出RII完全由节段性诱发电位产生,而RI主要归因于传导电位。