Telemacque Dionne, Zhu Feng-Zhao, Ren Zheng-Wei, Chen Kai-Fang, Drepaul Deepak, Yao Sheng, Yang Fan, Qu Yan-Zheng, Sun Ting-Fang, Guo Xiao-Dong
Department of Orthopedics, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science & Technology, Wuhan, Hubei Province, China.
Neural Regen Res. 2020 Oct;15(10):1814-1820. doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.280304.
Current management for spinal cord injury aims to reduce secondary damage and recover sensation and movement. Acute spinal cord injury is often accompanied by spinal cord compartment syndrome. Decompression by durotomy and/or myelotomy attempts to relieve secondary damage by completelyrelieving the compression of the spinal cord, removing the necrotic tissue, decreasing edema, reducing hemorrhage, and improving blood circulation in the spinal cord. However, it is controversial whether durotomy and/or myelotomy after spinal cord injury are beneficial to neurological recovery. This review compares the clinical effects of durotomy with those of myelotomy in the treatment of spinal cord injury. We found that durotomy has been performed more than myelotomy in the clinic, and that durotomy may be safer and more effective than myelotomy. Durotomy performed in humans had positive effects on neurological function in 92.3% of studies in this review, while durotomy in animals had positive effects on neurological function in 83.3% of studies. Myelotomy procedures were effective in 80% of animal studies, but only one clinical study of myelotomy has reported positive results, of motor and sensory improvement, in humans. However, a number of new animal studies have reported that durotomy and myelotomy are ineffective for spinal cord injury. More clinical data, in the form of a randomized controlled study, are needed to understand the effectiveness of durotomy and myelotomy.
目前脊髓损伤的治疗旨在减少继发性损伤并恢复感觉和运动功能。急性脊髓损伤常伴有脊髓腔隙综合征。通过硬脊膜切开术和/或脊髓切开术进行减压试图通过完全解除脊髓压迫、清除坏死组织、减轻水肿、减少出血以及改善脊髓血液循环来缓解继发性损伤。然而,脊髓损伤后进行硬脊膜切开术和/或脊髓切开术是否有利于神经功能恢复存在争议。本综述比较了硬脊膜切开术与脊髓切开术在治疗脊髓损伤中的临床效果。我们发现,临床上硬脊膜切开术的实施次数多于脊髓切开术,并且硬脊膜切开术可能比脊髓切开术更安全、更有效。在本综述中,人类实施硬脊膜切开术的研究中有92.3%对神经功能有积极影响,而动物实验中硬脊膜切开术对神经功能有积极影响的研究占83.3%。脊髓切开术在80%的动物研究中有效,但关于脊髓切开术的临床研究中只有一项报告了对人类运动和感觉改善的积极结果。然而,一些新的动物研究报告称硬脊膜切开术和脊髓切开术对脊髓损伤无效。需要更多以随机对照研究形式的临床数据来了解硬脊膜切开术和脊髓切开术的有效性。