Division of Orthopaedics, Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Physical Rehabilitation, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC.
J Arthroplasty. 2020 Aug;35(8):2002-2008. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.03.012. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
The volume of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has increased dramatically in recent years with good reported long-term outcomes. UKA can be performed under general or neuraxial (ie, spinal) anesthesia; however, little is known as to whether there is a difference in outcomes based on anesthesia type. The purpose of the present study is to compare perioperative outcomes between anesthesia types for patients undergoing primary elective UKA.
Patients who underwent primary elective UKA from 2007 to 2017 were identified from the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database. Operating room times, length of stay (LOS), 30-day adverse events, and readmission rates were compared between patients who received general anesthesia and those who received spinal anesthesia. Propensity-adjusted multivariate analysis was used to control for selection bias and baseline patient characteristics.
A total of 8639 patients underwent UKA and met the inclusion criteria for this study. Of these, 4728 patients (54.7%) received general anesthesia and 3911 patients (45.3%) received spinal anesthesia. On propensity-adjusted multivariate analyses, general anesthesia was associated with increased operative time (P < .001) and the occurrence of any severe adverse event (odds ratio [OR], 1.39; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.04-1.84; P = .024). In addition, general anesthesia was associated with higher rates of deep venous thrombosis (OR, 2.26; 95% CI, 1.11-4.6; P = .024) and superficial surgical site infection (OR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.6-1.81; P < .001). Finally, general anesthesia was also associated with a reduced likelihood of discharge to home (OR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.59-0.88; P < .001). No difference existed in postoperative hospital LOS or readmission rates among cohorts.
General anesthesia was associated with an increased rate of adverse events and increased operating room times as well as a reduced likelihood of discharge to home. There was no difference in hospital LOS or postoperative readmission rates between anesthesia types.
近年来,单髁膝关节置换术(UKA)的数量显著增加,且报告的长期结果良好。UKA 可在全身麻醉或椎管内麻醉(即脊髓麻醉)下进行;然而,关于麻醉类型是否会导致结果不同,目前知之甚少。本研究旨在比较接受初次择期 UKA 的患者在麻醉类型方面的围手术期结果。
从美国外科医师学会-国家手术质量改进计划数据库中确定了 2007 年至 2017 年间接受初次择期 UKA 的患者。比较全身麻醉和脊髓麻醉患者的手术室时间、住院时间(LOS)、30 天不良事件和再入院率。采用倾向调整多变量分析来控制选择偏倚和基线患者特征。
共有 8639 例患者接受 UKA 并符合本研究纳入标准。其中,4728 例(54.7%)患者接受全身麻醉,3911 例(45.3%)患者接受脊髓麻醉。在倾向调整的多变量分析中,全身麻醉与手术时间延长(P<0.001)和任何严重不良事件的发生(比值比[OR],1.39;95%置信区间[95%CI],1.04-1.84;P=0.024)相关。此外,全身麻醉与深静脉血栓形成(OR,2.26;95%CI,1.11-4.6;P=0.024)和浅表手术部位感染(OR,1.04;95%CI,0.6-1.81;P<0.001)的发生率较高相关。最后,全身麻醉与出院回家的可能性降低也相关(OR,0.72;95%CI,0.59-0.88;P<0.001)。两组间术后住院 LOS 或再入院率无差异。
全身麻醉与不良事件发生率增加、手术时间延长以及出院回家的可能性降低相关。两种麻醉类型在住院 LOS 或术后再入院率方面无差异。