Department of Orthopedic Trauma, East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, 150 Jimo Rd, Shanghai, 200120, China.
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 180 Fenglin Rd, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Int Orthop. 2020 Jun;44(6):1201-1208. doi: 10.1007/s00264-020-04533-w. Epub 2020 Apr 4.
To investigate the capability of intra-operative fluoroscopy to determine the reduction quality of intertrochanteric fractures and to determine which view (anteroposterior [AP] or lateral) can better predict the reduction quality.
A retrospective analysis of 128 patients with intertrochanteric fractures. Two observers were asked to independently evaluate the quality of reduction (positive or non-positive support) based on intra-operative fluoroscopy (AP and lateral view). Results based on CT scans were considered as the gold standard. Sensitivity, specificity, percentage of correct interpretations, and agreement were calculated.
At the first reading, sensitivity, false-negative rate, specificity, false-positive rate, and percentage of correct interpretations were 86.1%, 13.9%, 69.4%, 30.6%, and 79.7% for junior resident and 81.0%, 19.0%, 67.3%, 32.7%, and 75.8% for senior resident (all p > 0.05). It was highly predictive of a reliable cortical support when cortical position in AP view was consistent with that in lateral view (85/85, 100% for junior, and 86/86, 100% for senior). Lateral view was generally predictive of a final cortical support when the position between AP and lateral view was inconsistent (90.7% [39/43] vs 9.3% [4/43] for junior, p < 0.001; 92.9% [39/42] vs 7.1% [3/42] for senior). Comparable results were reported at the second reading. The average inter-observer and intra-observer agreement was 0.670 and 0.654, respectively.
We should ensure the cortical support for both AP and lateral view are positive intra-operatively as far as possible. Even if this is not possible, we need to make sure the lateral position is positive support.
研究术中透视术确定股骨转子间骨折复位质量的能力,并确定哪种视图(前后位[AP]或侧位)可以更好地预测复位质量。
对 128 例股骨转子间骨折患者进行回顾性分析。两名观察者根据术中透视(AP 和侧位)独立评估复位质量(阳性或非阳性支撑)。以 CT 扫描结果为金标准。计算敏感性、特异性、正确解释百分比和一致性。
在初次阅读时,初级住院医师的敏感性、假阴性率、特异性、假阳性率和正确解释百分比分别为 86.1%、13.9%、69.4%、30.6%和 79.7%,高级住院医师分别为 81.0%、19.0%、67.3%、32.7%和 75.8%(均 P>0.05)。当 AP 视图中的皮质位置与侧位视图中的皮质位置一致时,对可靠皮质支撑的预测性很高(初级为 85/85,100%;高级为 86/86,100%)。当 AP 和侧位视图之间的位置不一致时,侧位视图通常可预测最终皮质支撑(初级为 90.7%[39/43]与 9.3%[4/43],P<0.001;高级为 92.9%[39/42]与 7.1%[3/42],P<0.001)。第二次阅读报告了类似的结果。观察者间和观察者内的平均一致性分别为 0.670 和 0.654。
应尽可能确保术中 AP 和侧位视图的皮质支撑均为阳性。即使这不可能,我们也需要确保侧位的位置是阳性支撑。