Jia Xiaoyang, Qiang Minfei, Zhang Kun, Han Qinghui, Jia Gengxin, Shi Tianhao, Wu Ying, Chen Yanxi
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 180 Fenglin Rd, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Research and Development Department, Yangfeng (Shanghai) Science and Technology CO., LTD, Shanghai, 200439, China.
Heliyon. 2024 Feb 2;10(3):e25389. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25389. eCollection 2024 Feb 15.
Postoperative burst of the lateral femoral wall is thought to be the main predictor of reoperation for intertrochanteric fractures, which is routinely evaluated using plain radiographs. We retrospectively compared computed tomography (CT) scans and radiographs regarding the ability to detect burst of the lateral wall. We also investigated whether intramedullary nails may cause iatrogenic burst of the lateral wall.
From January 2010 to December 2021, patients aged 65 years and older who undergone intertrochanteric fractures treated with the proximal femoral nail antirotation 2 (PFNA-Ⅱ) were included. The incidence of burst of the lateral wall was evaluated with two different imaging modalities by two observers. Two rounds of evaluation were performed: (1) with plain radiographs alone; and (2) with CT scans combined with radiographs. Interobserver and intraobserver agreement (κ value) for evaluation of the lateral wall burst was assessed.
A total of 1507 patients were included (362 males and 1145 females). Compared with radiographs alone (12.0 %, 181/1507 patients), a higher rate of lateral wall burst was found by CT scans combined with radiographs (72.9 %, 1098/1507 patients) for observer 1 at first reading ( < 0.001). Similar results were seen in other evaluations. Interobserver and intraobserver agreement was substantial for radiographs alone (κ, 0.659-0.727) and almost perfect for CT scans combined with radiographs (κ, 0.847-0.926).
Computed tomography combined with radiographs is superior to radiographs alone for detecting burst of the lateral wall after intertrochanteric fracture fixation. Additionally, PFNA-Ⅱ could cause iatrogenic burst of the lateral wall for intertrochanteric fractures in the elderly.
股骨外侧壁术后爆裂被认为是转子间骨折再次手术的主要预测因素,通常使用X线平片进行评估。我们回顾性比较了计算机断层扫描(CT)和X线平片检测外侧壁爆裂的能力。我们还研究了髓内钉是否会导致医源性外侧壁爆裂。
纳入2010年1月至2021年12月期间接受股骨近端抗旋髓内钉2(PFNA-Ⅱ)治疗的65岁及以上转子间骨折患者。由两名观察者使用两种不同的成像方式评估外侧壁爆裂的发生率。进行了两轮评估:(1)仅使用X线平片;(2)使用CT扫描结合X线平片。评估外侧壁爆裂的观察者间和观察者内一致性(κ值)。
共纳入1507例患者(男性362例,女性1145例)。与仅使用X线平片相比(12.0%,181/1507例患者),观察者1在首次阅读时,CT扫描结合X线平片发现外侧壁爆裂的发生率更高(72.9%,1098/1507例患者)(P<0.001)。其他评估也得到了类似结果。仅使用X线平片时观察者间和观察者内一致性良好(κ,0.659-0.727),CT扫描结合X线平片时几乎完美(κ,0.847-0.926)。
CT扫描结合X线平片在检测转子间骨折固定术后外侧壁爆裂方面优于单独的X线平片。此外,PFNA-Ⅱ可能导致老年转子间骨折患者出现医源性外侧壁爆裂。