• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
When Does Differential Item Functioning Matter for Screening? A Method for Empirical Evaluation.差异项目功能在筛查中何时重要?一种实证评估方法。
Assessment. 2021 Mar;28(2):446-456. doi: 10.1177/1073191120913618. Epub 2020 Apr 4.
2
Psychometric Properties and Performance of the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Depression Short Forms in Ethnically Diverse Groups.患者报告结局测量信息系统(PROMIS)抑郁简表在不同种族群体中的心理测量特性及表现
Psychol Test Assess Model. 2016;58(1):141-181.
3
Measurement Equivalence of the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Interference Short Form Items: Application to Ethnically Diverse Cancer and Palliative Care Populations.患者报告结局测量信息系统(PROMIS)疼痛干扰简表条目的测量等效性:在不同种族癌症和姑息治疗人群中的应用。
Psychol Test Assess Model. 2016;58(2):309-352.
4
Modern psychometric methods for detection of differential item functioning: application to cognitive assessment measures.用于检测项目功能差异的现代心理测量方法:在认知评估测量中的应用。
Stat Med. 2000;19(11-12):1651-83. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(20000615/30)19:11/12<1651::aid-sim453>3.0.co;2-h.
5
Measurement Equivalence of the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Anxiety Short Forms in Ethnically Diverse Groups.患者报告结局测量信息系统(PROMIS)焦虑简表在不同种族群体中的测量等效性
Psychol Test Assess Model. 2016;58(1):183-219.
6
Evaluating measurement equivalence using the item response theory log-likelihood ratio (IRTLR) method to assess differential item functioning (DIF): applications (with illustrations) to measures of physical functioning ability and general distress.使用项目反应理论对数似然比(IRTLR)方法评估测量等价性,以评估项目功能差异(DIF):身体功能能力和一般痛苦测量的应用(附说明)
Qual Life Res. 2007;16 Suppl 1:43-68. doi: 10.1007/s11136-007-9186-4. Epub 2007 May 5.
7
Generalisability of the Barthel Index and the Functional Independence Measure: robustness of disability measures to Differential Item Functioning.巴氏指数和功能独立性测量的可推广性:残疾测量对项目功能差异的稳健性。
Disabil Rehabil. 2025 Apr;47(8):2134-2145. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2024.2391554. Epub 2024 Sep 2.
8
After Differential Item Functioning Is Detected: IRT Item Calibration and Scoring in the Presence of DIF.在检测到项目功能差异之后:存在项目功能差异时的项目反应理论项目校准与计分
Appl Psychol Meas. 2016 Nov;40(8):573-591. doi: 10.1177/0146621616664304. Epub 2016 Sep 24.
9
Improvement in Detection of Differential Item Functioning Using a Mixture Item Response Theory Model.使用混合项目反应理论模型改进差异项目功能检测
Multivariate Behav Res. 2010 Nov 30;45(6):975-99. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2010.533047.
10
Wald χ Test for Differential Item Functioning Detection with Polytomous Items in Multilevel Data.用于多水平数据中多分类项目差异项目功能检测的 Wald χ 检验
Educ Psychol Meas. 2024 Jun;84(3):530-548. doi: 10.1177/00131644231181688. Epub 2023 Jul 11.

引用本文的文献

1
"What does 'often' even mean?" Revising and validating the Comprehensive Autistic Trait Inventory in partnership with autistic people.“‘经常’到底是什么意思?”与自闭症患者合作修订和验证《综合自闭症特征量表》。
Mol Autism. 2025 Feb 6;16(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s13229-025-00643-7.
2
Are there subgroup differences in the accuracy of 'screening' questions for mood and anxiety disorder diagnostic interviews?“筛查”问题在情绪和焦虑障碍诊断访谈中的准确性是否存在亚组差异?
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2024 Dec;33(4):e70008. doi: 10.1002/mpr.70008.
3
Protocol for a systematic review evaluating psychometric properties and gender-related measurement (non)invariance of self-report assessment tools for autism in adults.成人自闭症自陈评估工具的心理计量特性和与性别相关的测量(不变性)系统评价议定书。
Syst Rev. 2024 Jul 19;13(1):188. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02604-2.
4
Measurement invariance of the parent-reported Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in autistic adolescents.家长报告的自闭症青少年长处和困难问卷的测量不变性。
Autism. 2024 Oct;28(10):2623-2636. doi: 10.1177/13623613241236805. Epub 2024 Mar 13.
5
Gender bias in autism screening: measurement invariance of different model frameworks of the Autism Spectrum Quotient.自闭症筛查中的性别偏见:自闭症谱系商数不同模型框架的测量不变性
BJPsych Open. 2023 Oct 2;9(5):e173. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2023.562.
6
Summary Intervals for Model-Based Classification Accuracy and Consistency Indices.基于模型的分类准确性和一致性指数的汇总区间。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2023 Apr;83(2):240-261. doi: 10.1177/00131644221092347. Epub 2022 Apr 28.
7
Mental Health and Well-being Measures for Mean Comparison and Screening in Adolescents: An Assessment of Unidimensionality and Sex and Age Measurement Invariance.青少年平均比较与筛查中的心理健康和幸福感测量:单维性以及性别和年龄测量不变性的评估
Assessment. 2024 Mar;31(2):219-236. doi: 10.1177/10731911231158623. Epub 2023 Mar 2.
8
Psychometric properties of sum scores and factor scores differ even when their correlation is 0.98: A response to Widaman and Revelle.即使总分和因子分数的相关系数为 0.98,它们的心理计量学特性也会有所不同:对 Widaman 和 Revelle 的回应。
Behav Res Methods. 2023 Dec;55(8):4269-4290. doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-02016-x. Epub 2022 Nov 17.
9
How Accurate and Consistent Are Score-Based Assessment Decisions? A Procedure Using the Linear Factor Model.基于分数的评估决策有多准确和一致?使用线性因子模型的程序。
Assessment. 2023 Jul;30(5):1640-1650. doi: 10.1177/10731911221113568. Epub 2022 Aug 11.
10
Measurement Invariance of Psychological Distress, Substance Use, and Adult Social Support across Race/Ethnicity and Sex among Sexual Minority Youth.性少数青年中,心理困扰、物质使用及成人社会支持在种族/族裔和性别间的测量不变性
J Sex Res. 2023 May-Jun;60(5):674-688. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2022.2038059. Epub 2022 Feb 24.

本文引用的文献

1
Quantifying the impact of partial measurement invariance in diagnostic research: An application to addiction research.量化部分测量不变性在诊断研究中的影响:在成瘾研究中的应用。
Addict Behav. 2019 Jul;94:50-56. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2018.11.029. Epub 2018 Nov 22.
2
It Might Not Make a Big DIF: Improved Differential Test Functioning Statistics That Account for Sampling Variability.可能差异不大:改进的差异检验功能统计量,考虑了抽样变异性。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2016 Feb;76(1):114-140. doi: 10.1177/0013164415584576. Epub 2015 Jun 29.
3
Differential item functioning magnitude and impact measures from item response theory models.项目反应理论模型中的差异项目功能大小及影响度量
Psychol Test Assess Model. 2016;58(1):79-98.
4
Screening for Depression in the General Population with the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D): A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.使用流行病学研究中心抑郁量表(CES-D)对普通人群进行抑郁症筛查:一项荟萃分析的系统评价
PLoS One. 2016 May 16;11(5):e0155431. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155431. eCollection 2016.
5
A primer on receiver operating characteristic analysis and diagnostic efficiency statistics for pediatric psychology: we are ready to ROC.儿科心理学中接受者操作特征分析与诊断效率统计入门:我们准备好进行ROC分析了。
J Pediatr Psychol. 2014 Mar;39(2):204-21. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jst062. Epub 2013 Aug 21.
6
When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under suboptimal conditions.类别变量在何时可以视为连续变量?在次优条件下稳健连续和类别 SEM 估计方法的比较。
Psychol Methods. 2012 Sep;17(3):354-73. doi: 10.1037/a0029315. Epub 2012 Jul 16.
7
Modifying measures based on differential item functioning (DIF) impact analyses.基于差异项目功能(DIF)影响分析的修正措施。
J Aging Health. 2012 Sep;24(6):1044-76. doi: 10.1177/0898264312436877. Epub 2012 Mar 15.
8
The value of item response theory in clinical assessment: a review.项目反应理论在临床评估中的价值:综述。
Assessment. 2011 Sep;18(3):291-307. doi: 10.1177/1073191110374797. Epub 2010 Jul 19.
9
A taxonomy of effect size measures for the differential functioning of items and scales.项目和量表差异功能的效应量度量分类法。
J Appl Psychol. 2010 Jul;95(4):728-43. doi: 10.1037/a0018966.
10
Item factor analysis: current approaches and future directions.项目因素分析:当前方法与未来方向。
Psychol Methods. 2007 Mar;12(1):58-79. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.12.1.58.

差异项目功能在筛查中何时重要?一种实证评估方法。

When Does Differential Item Functioning Matter for Screening? A Method for Empirical Evaluation.

作者信息

Gonzalez Oscar, Pelham William E

机构信息

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.

出版信息

Assessment. 2021 Mar;28(2):446-456. doi: 10.1177/1073191120913618. Epub 2020 Apr 4.

DOI:10.1177/1073191120913618
PMID:32248701
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9705193/
Abstract

When items in a screening measure exhibit differential item functioning (DIF) across groups (e.g., males vs. females), DIF might affect which individuals are "caught" in the screening. This phenomenon is common, but DIF detection procedures do not typically provide guidance on whether the presence of DIF will meaningfully affect screening accuracy. Millsap and Kwok proposed a method to quantify the impact of DIF on screening accuracy, but their approach had limitations that prevent its use in scenarios where items are discrete. We extend the Millsap and Kwok procedure to accommodate discrete items and provide functions to apply the procedure to the user's own data. We illustrate our approach using published screening information and evaluate the proposed methodology with a small simulation study. Overall, we encourage researchers to use empirical methods to evaluate the extent to which the presence of DIF in a screening measure materially affects screening performance.

摘要

当筛查指标中的项目在不同群体(如男性与女性)间表现出项目功能差异(DIF)时,DIF可能会影响哪些个体在筛查中被“检出”。这种现象很常见,但DIF检测程序通常不会就DIF的存在是否会对筛查准确性产生有意义的影响提供指导。米尔萨普和郭提出了一种量化DIF对筛查准确性影响的方法,但其方法存在局限性,无法用于项目为离散型的情况。我们扩展了米尔萨普和郭的程序以适应离散型项目,并提供了将该程序应用于用户自身数据的函数。我们使用已发表的筛查信息来说明我们的方法,并通过一个小型模拟研究对所提出的方法进行评估。总体而言,我们鼓励研究人员采用实证方法来评估筛查指标中DIF的存在对筛查性能产生实质性影响的程度。