Black Louise, Humphrey Neil, Panayiotou Margarita, Marquez Jose
The University of Manchester, UK.
Assessment. 2024 Mar;31(2):219-236. doi: 10.1177/10731911231158623. Epub 2023 Mar 2.
Adolescence is a period of increased vulnerability for low well-being and mental health problems, particularly for girls and older adolescents. Accurate measurement via brief self-report is therefore vital to understanding prevalence, group trends, screening efforts, and response to intervention. We drew on data from the #BeeWell study ( = 37,149, aged 12-15) to consider whether sum-scoring, mean comparisons, and deployment for screening were likely to show bias for eight such measures. Evidence for unidimensionality, considering dynamic fit confirmatory factor models, exploratory graph analysis, and bifactor modeling, was found for five measures. Of these five, most showed a degree of non-invariance across sex and age likely incompatible with mean comparison. Effects on selection were minimal, except sensitivity was substantially lower in boys for the internalizing symptoms measure. Measure-specific insights are discussed, as are general issues highlighted by our analysis, such as item reversals and measurement invariance.
青春期是幸福感较低和出现心理健康问题的风险增加的时期,尤其是对女孩和年龄较大的青少年而言。因此,通过简短的自我报告进行准确测量对于了解患病率、群体趋势、筛查工作以及对干预措施的反应至关重要。我们利用了#BeeWell研究(n = 37149,年龄在12至15岁之间)的数据,来考量对八项此类测量指标进行求和计分、均值比较以及用于筛查是否可能会显示出偏差。通过考虑动态拟合验证性因子模型、探索性图分析和双因子建模,发现五项测量指标具有单维度性证据。在这五项指标中,大多数在性别和年龄上表现出一定程度的非不变性,这可能与均值比较不兼容。对选择的影响微乎其微,不过在内化症状测量指标方面,男孩的敏感性显著较低。文中讨论了特定测量指标的见解,以及我们的分析所凸显的一般问题,如项目反向计分和测量不变性。