Cancer Prevention and Control Program, University of South Carolina , Columbia, South Carolina, USA.
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina , Columbia, South Carolina, USA.
Women Health. 2020 Aug;60(7):792-805. doi: 10.1080/03630242.2020.1746950. Epub 2020 Apr 5.
Lifestyle interventions may reduce inflammation and lower breast cancer (BrCa) risk. This randomized trial assessed the impact of the Sistas Inspiring Sistas Through Activity and Support (SISTAS) study on plasma C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6) and Dietary Inflammatory Index (DII). This unblinded, dietary and physical activity trial was implemented in 337 obese (body mass index [BMI] ≥30 kg/m) African American (AA) women recruited between 2011 and 2015 in South Carolina through a community-based participatory approach with measurements at baseline, 3 months, and 12 months. Participants were randomized into either intervention (n = 176) or wait-list control group (n = 161). Linear mixed-effect models were used for analyses of CRP and IL-6. Baseline CRP was significantly higher in those with greater obesity, body fat percentage, and waist circumference (all <.01). No difference was observed between groups for CRP or IL-6 at 3 or 12 months; however, improvements in diet were observed in the intervention group compared to the control group ( = .02) at 3 months but were not sustained at 12 months. Although the intervention was not successful at reducing levels of CRP or IL-6, a significant decrease was observed in DII score for the intervention group, indicating short-term positive dietary change.
生活方式干预可能会减轻炎症并降低乳腺癌(BrCa)的风险。这项随机试验评估了 Sistas Inspiring Sistas Through Activity and Support(SISTAS)研究对血浆 C 反应蛋白(CRP)、白细胞介素-6(IL-6)和饮食炎症指数(DII)的影响。这项非盲、饮食和体力活动试验于 2011 年至 2015 年在南卡罗来纳州通过社区参与的方法招募了 337 名肥胖(体重指数[BMI]≥30kg/m)的非裔美国(AA)女性,基线、3 个月和 12 个月进行测量。参与者被随机分为干预组(n=176)或候补对照组(n=161)。线性混合效应模型用于 CRP 和 IL-6 的分析。CRP 基线在肥胖程度、体脂肪百分比和腰围较大的人群中显著升高(均<.01)。3 个月或 12 个月时,两组间 CRP 或 IL-6 无差异;然而,与对照组相比,干预组在 3 个月时饮食改善(=0.02),但 12 个月时未持续。尽管干预措施未能降低 CRP 或 IL-6 水平,但干预组的 DII 评分显著降低,表明短期饮食发生了积极变化。