• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

接受开窗或分支型腔内主动脉瘤修复术患者的腰池引流并发症:制定腰池引流管理的机构方案。

Lumbar drain complications in patients undergoing fenestrated or branched endovascular aortic aneurysm repair: Development of an institutional protocol for lumbar drain management.

机构信息

Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Mass.

Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Mass.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2020 Nov;72(5):1576-1583. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.02.013. Epub 2020 Apr 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.jvs.2020.02.013
PMID:32249045
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Lumbar drain placement with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drainage is an effective adjunct for reducing the risk of spinal cord ischemia in patients undergoing complex aortic aneurysm repair. However, lumbar drain placement is a challenging procedure with potential for significant complications. We sought to characterize complications of lumbar drain placement in a large, single-center experience of patients who underwent fenestrated or branched endovascular aneurysm repair (F/BEVAR).

METHODS

All patients who underwent F/BEVAR and attempted lumbar drain placement from 2010 to 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. All lumbar drains were placed by four cardiovascular anesthesiologists who compose the complex aortic anesthesia team. Lumbar drain placement was guided by a set protocol and used whenever the aortic stent graft coverage was planned to extend more proximal than 40 mm above the celiac artery. Details relating to lumbar drain placement, management, and frequency and type of associated complications were characterized.

RESULTS

During the study period, 256 patients underwent F/BEVAR, of whom 100 (39%) were planned for lumbar drain placement. Successful placement occurred in 98 (98%) of the cases. All lumbar drains were placed before induction of general anesthesia, using fluoroscopy guidance in 28 cases (28%). The most common level of placement was L4-5 (n = 42 [42%]). The majority (n = 82 [82%]) were left in place ≤48 hours; 21% were removed during the first 24 hours, and 61% were removed between 24 and 48 hours. Nonfunctionality was the most common complication, occurring in 16 (16%) patients. Catheter dislodgment or fracture, CSF leak, and postdural puncture headache were observed in 4 (4%), 7 (7%), and 4 (4%) patients, respectively. The most common bleeding complication was the presence of asymptomatic blood in the CSF (n = 11 [11%]), whereas subarachnoid hemorrhage combined with intraventricular hemorrhage occurred in three patients (3%); none of these patients required surgical drainage or intervention. No infectious complications were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Lumbar drain placement for CSF drainage is a commonly employed adjunct to prevent spinal cord ischemia in F/BEVAR. Our experience demonstrates that lumbar drain placement can be performed successfully but is associated with a significant rate of nonfunctionality and a diverse range of complications that, fortunately, do not commonly have significant long-term sequelae.

摘要

目的

在接受复杂主动脉瘤修复的患者中,放置带脑脊液(CSF)引流的腰椎引流管是降低脊髓缺血风险的有效辅助手段。然而,腰椎引流管的放置是一项具有挑战性的操作,可能会出现严重的并发症。我们旨在描述在接受开窗或分支型血管内动脉瘤修复(F/BEVAR)的大量单中心患者中,腰椎引流管放置的并发症特征。

方法

回顾性分析 2010 年至 2019 年期间接受 F/BEVAR 并尝试放置腰椎引流管的所有患者。所有腰椎引流管均由四位组成复杂主动脉麻醉团队的心血管麻醉医师放置。腰椎引流管的放置遵循一套既定的方案,只要主动脉支架移植物的覆盖范围计划超过腹腔干上方 40mm 以上,就会使用。描述了与腰椎引流管放置、管理以及相关并发症的频率和类型相关的详细信息。

结果

在研究期间,256 例患者接受了 F/BEVAR,其中 100 例(39%)计划放置腰椎引流管。98 例(98%)成功放置。所有腰椎引流管均在全身麻醉诱导前放置,28 例(28%)使用透视引导。最常见的放置部位是 L4-5(n=42[42%])。大多数(n=82[82%])在≤48 小时内留置;21%在 24 小时内取出,61%在 24 至 48 小时内取出。最常见的并发症是无功能,发生于 16 例(16%)患者中。4 例(4%)患者出现导管移位或断裂,7 例(7%)患者出现脑脊液漏,4 例(4%)患者出现硬脊膜穿刺后头痛。最常见的出血并发症是脑脊液中有无症状性血液(n=11[11%]),3 例患者出现蛛网膜下腔出血合并脑室出血(3%);这些患者均无需手术引流或干预。未观察到感染性并发症。

结论

在 F/BEVAR 中,放置腰椎引流管以引流 CSF 是预防脊髓缺血的常用辅助手段。我们的经验表明,腰椎引流管的放置可以成功进行,但会导致很高的无功能发生率,并出现多种并发症,但幸运的是,这些并发症通常不会产生严重的长期后果。

相似文献

1
Lumbar drain complications in patients undergoing fenestrated or branched endovascular aortic aneurysm repair: Development of an institutional protocol for lumbar drain management.接受开窗或分支型腔内主动脉瘤修复术患者的腰池引流并发症:制定腰池引流管理的机构方案。
J Vasc Surg. 2020 Nov;72(5):1576-1583. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.02.013. Epub 2020 Apr 2.
2
Prospective randomized pilot trial comparing prophylactic and therapeutic cerebrospinal fluid drainage during complex endovascular thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair.前瞻性随机对照初步临床试验比较复杂胸主动脉腹主动脉瘤腔内修复术中预防性和治疗性脑脊液引流。
J Vasc Surg. 2024 Jul;80(1):11-19. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.02.041. Epub 2024 Apr 6.
3
Cerebrospinal fluid drainage complications during first stage and completion fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair.一期开窗分支血管腔内修复术中脑脊液引流并发症。
J Vasc Surg. 2020 Apr;71(4):1109-1118.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.06.210. Epub 2019 Sep 26.
4
Protocolized Based Management of Cerebrospinal Fluid Drains in Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair Procedures.基于方案的胸主动脉腔内修复术后脑脊液引流管理。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2021 Apr;72:409-418. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2020.08.134. Epub 2020 Sep 11.
5
Risk factors for spinal cord injury and complications of cerebrospinal fluid drainage in patients undergoing fenestrated and branched endovascular aneurysm repair.接受开窗和分支型血管内动脉瘤修复术患者脊髓损伤及脑脊液引流并发症的危险因素。
J Vasc Surg. 2021 Feb;73(2):399-409.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.05.070. Epub 2020 Jul 5.
6
Complications associated with lumbar drain placement for endovascular aortic repair.与血管内主动脉修复相关的腰穿引流并发症。
J Vasc Surg. 2021 May;73(5):1513-1524.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.08.150. Epub 2020 Oct 11.
7
Selective Versus Routine Spinal Drain Use for Fenestrated/Branched Endovascular Aortic Repair (F-BEVAR).开窗/分支型腔内血管修复术(F-BEVAR)中选择性与常规使用脊柱引流的比较。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2021 Oct;76:168-173. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2021.05.009. Epub 2021 Jun 18.
8
Results with selective preoperative lumbar drain placement for thoracic endovascular aortic repair.选择性术前腰椎引流在胸主动脉腔内修复术中的应用结果。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2013 Jun;95(6):1968-74; discussion 1974-5. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.03.016. Epub 2013 Apr 28.
9
Elective Fenestrated and Branched Endovascular Thoraco-abdominal Aortic Repair with Supracoeliac Sealing Zones and without Prophylactic Cerebrospinal Fluid Drainage: Early and Medium-term Outcomes.腔内开窗和分支型胸腹主动脉修复术时采用腹腔干上方密封区且不预防性使用脑脊液引流:早期和中期结果。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2019 May;57(5):639-648. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.12.012. Epub 2019 Apr 17.
10
Stenting of superior mesenteric and celiac arteries does not increase complication rates after fenestrated-branched endovascular aneurysm repair.经开窗分支腔内血管修复术后,对肠系膜上动脉和腹腔动脉进行支架置入术并不会增加并发症发生率。
J Vasc Surg. 2019 Sep;70(3):691-701. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.11.043. Epub 2019 Mar 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Evolving practices of spinal drain use for branch/fenestrated endovascular aortic repair patients in the United States Aortic Research Consortium.美国主动脉研究联盟中用于分支/开窗式血管内主动脉修复患者的脊髓引流使用方法的演变
J Vasc Surg. 2025 Jun;81(6):1266-1277.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2025.01.216. Epub 2025 Feb 4.
2
Complications of cerebrospinal fluid drainage in thoracoabdominal aortic procedures.胸腹主动脉手术中脑脊液引流的并发症。
Can J Surg. 2024 Dec 13;67(6):E389-E396. doi: 10.1503/cjs.003624. Print 2024 Nov-Dec.
3
Comparison of safety of lumbar drain versus external ventricular drain in symptomatic hydrocephalus following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.
动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血后症状性脑积水患者中腰大池引流与脑室外引流安全性的比较。
Interv Neuroradiol. 2024 Aug 21:15910199241276676. doi: 10.1177/15910199241276676.
4
Risk Factors for Spinal Cord Injury during Endovascular Repair of Thoracoabdominal Aneurysm: Review of the Literature and Proposal of a Prognostic Score.胸腹主动脉瘤腔内修复术中脊髓损伤的危险因素:文献综述及预后评分建议
J Clin Med. 2023 Dec 5;12(24):7520. doi: 10.3390/jcm12247520.
5
Spinal cord protection: lessons learned from endovascular repair.脊髓保护:从血管内修复术中吸取的经验教训。
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2023 Sep 28;12(5):484-486. doi: 10.21037/acs-2023-scp-0049. Epub 2023 Jun 21.
6
Simultaneous Endovascular Repair Is Not Associated With Increased Risk for Thoracic and Abdominal Aortic Pathologies: Early and Midterm Outcomes.同期血管腔内修复与胸主动脉和腹主动脉病变风险增加无关:早期和中期结果
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 May 27;9:883708. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.883708. eCollection 2022.