Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Vascular Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Department of Medicine III, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus at the TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2020 Jun 1;105(6). doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgaa159.
Adrenalectomy is the preferred treatment for unilateral primary aldosteronism but the results of long-term control of blood pressure (BP) are far from optimal. One possible explanation relates to the quality of the assessment of treatment effects on BP.
To examine the quality of reporting BP measurements in studies assessing the outcome of adrenalectomy on BP.
We conducted a systematic review searching 3 databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science) for articles published from January 1, 1990, onwards. Sixty-six studies, each reporting on more than 50 adrenalectomized patients, were eligible for full analysis.
In 37 of the analyzed 66 studies (56.1%) BP values both before and after adrenalectomy were reported. In 19.7% (13/66) of the studies the method of BP measurement was described. The number of visits and number of BP recordings per visit on which BP results were based were reported in <15% of papers. The criteria for the diagnosis of hypertension were described in 72.7% (48/66) of the studies. The used definitions of improvement of BP control after adrenalectomy were variable, with 84.8% of the studies not providing any quantitative criteria to define reduction in BP.
We conclude that the quality of reporting on BP control after adrenalectomy for primary aldosteronism shows substantial deficiencies and inconsistencies, thus impacting negatively on accurate assessment of effects of adrenalectomy on BP control. Future studies should adhere to accepted recommendations of correct BP measurement and should provide detailed description of the methods used for BP measurement.
肾上腺切除术是单侧原发性醛固酮增多症的首选治疗方法,但血压(BP)长期控制的效果远非理想。一种可能的解释与评估治疗对 BP 影响的效果的质量有关。
检查评估肾上腺切除术对 BP 影响的研究中 BP 测量报告的质量。
我们进行了系统评价,在 3 个数据库(PubMed、EMBASE、Web of Science)中搜索了 1990 年 1 月 1 日以后发表的文章。符合全分析条件的 66 项研究,每项研究均报告了 50 多名肾上腺切除术患者。
在分析的 66 项研究中的 37 项(56.1%)中,报告了肾上腺切除术前和术后的 BP 值。在 19.7%(13/66)的研究中,描述了 BP 测量方法。报告了基于 BP 结果的就诊次数和每次就诊的 BP 记录次数的研究<15%。72.7%(48/66)的研究中描述了高血压的诊断标准。BP 控制改善后肾上腺切除术的使用定义各不相同,84.8%的研究未提供任何定义 BP 降低的定量标准。
我们的结论是,原发性醛固酮增多症肾上腺切除术治疗后 BP 控制报告的质量存在明显缺陷和不一致,从而对准确评估肾上腺切除术对 BP 控制的影响产生负面影响。未来的研究应遵循正确 BP 测量的公认建议,并应详细描述用于 BP 测量的方法。