• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Cervical Lymph Node Metastases in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma-How Much Imaging Do We Need?口腔鳞状细胞癌的颈部淋巴结转移——我们需要多少影像学检查?
Diagnostics (Basel). 2020 Apr 2;10(4):199. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics10040199.
2
18F-FDG PET and CT/MRI in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: a prospective study of 124 patients with histologic correlation.18F-FDG PET与CT/MRI在口腔鳞状细胞癌中的应用:一项对124例患者进行组织学相关性分析的前瞻性研究
J Nucl Med. 2005 Jul;46(7):1136-43.
3
Prospective comparison of 18F-FDG PET with conventional imaging modalities (CT, MRI, US) in lymph node staging of head and neck cancer.18F-FDG PET与传统成像方式(CT、MRI、US)在头颈部癌淋巴结分期中的前瞻性比较。
Eur J Nucl Med. 1998 Sep;25(9):1255-60. doi: 10.1007/s002590050293.
4
Comparing the Diagnostic Accuracy of Ultrasonography, CT, MRI, and PET/CT in Cervical Lymph Node Metastasis of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma.超声、CT、MRI及PET/CT对口腔鳞状细胞癌颈淋巴结转移的诊断准确性比较
Biomedicines. 2023 Nov 22;11(12):3119. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11123119.
5
Comparison of the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the presurgical detection of lymph node metastases in patients with uterine cervical carcinoma: a prospective study.磁共振成像与正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描在子宫颈癌患者术前淋巴结转移检测中的准确性比较:一项前瞻性研究。
Cancer. 2006 Feb 15;106(4):914-22. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21641.
6
Diagnostic Value of Preoperative uPAR-PET/CT in Regional Lymph Node Staging of Oral and Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Prospective Phase II Trial.术前uPAR-PET/CT在口腔和口咽鳞状细胞癌区域淋巴结分期中的诊断价值:一项前瞻性II期试验
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Oct 25;13(21):3303. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13213303.
7
The role of ultrasound in primary workup of cervical cancer staging (ESGO, ESTRO, ESP cervical cancer guidelines).超声在宫颈癌分期初步检查中的作用(欧洲妇科肿瘤学会、欧洲放射肿瘤学会、西班牙妇科肿瘤学会宫颈癌指南)
Ceska Gynekol. 2019 Winter;84(1):40-48.
8
External ultrasonography of the neck does not add diagnostic value to integrated positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) scanning in the diagnosis of cervical lymph node metastases in patients with esophageal carcinoma.颈部外部超声检查对食管癌患者颈淋巴结转移的诊断价值,与整合正电子发射断层扫描-计算机断层扫描(PET-CT)扫描相比并无增加。
Dis Esophagus. 2012 Aug;25(6):555-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2011.01289.x. Epub 2011 Dec 9.
9
Is there an additive value of 18 F-FDG PET-CT to CT/MRI for detecting nodal metastasis in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma patients with palpably negative neck?对于颈部触诊阴性的口咽鳞状细胞癌患者,18 F-FDG PET-CT相对于CT/MRI在检测淋巴结转移方面是否具有附加价值?
Acta Radiol. 2016 Nov;57(11):1352-1359. doi: 10.1177/0284185115587544. Epub 2016 Jul 19.
10
Diagnostic Accuracy of Up-Front PET/CT and MRI for Detecting Cervical Lymph Node Metastases in T1-T2 Oral Cavity Cancer-A Prospective Cohort Study.upfront PET/CT与MRI对T1-T2期口腔癌颈部淋巴结转移的诊断准确性——一项前瞻性队列研究
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Nov 9;13(22):3414. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13223414.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical and molecular characterizations of HNSCC patients with occult lymph node metastasis.隐匿性淋巴结转移的头颈部鳞状细胞癌患者的临床及分子特征
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 12;15(1):25263. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-10320-7.
2
Comparing the Efficacy of CT, MRI, PET-CT, and US in the Detection of Cervical Lymph Node Metastases in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma with Clinically Negative Neck Lymph Node: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.比较CT、MRI、PET-CT和超声在检测头颈部鳞状细胞癌临床颈部淋巴结阴性患者颈部淋巴结转移中的疗效:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Clin Med. 2024 Dec 14;13(24):7622. doi: 10.3390/jcm13247622.
3
Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Insights from Dual-Energy Computed Tomography (DECT).头颈部鳞状细胞癌:双能 CT 检测的新视角。
Tomography. 2024 Nov 11;10(11):1780-1797. doi: 10.3390/tomography10110131.
4
Predictors of Occult Metastasis and Prognostic Factors in Patients with cN0 Oral Cancer Who Underwent Elective Neck Dissection.接受择期颈清扫术的cN0期口腔癌患者隐匿性转移的预测因素及预后因素
Diseases. 2024 Feb 12;12(2):39. doi: 10.3390/diseases12020039.
5
Comparing three-dimensional and two-dimensional deep-learning, radiomics, and fusion models for predicting occult lymph node metastasis in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma based on CT imaging: a multicentre, retrospective, diagnostic study.基于CT成像比较三维和二维深度学习、影像组学及融合模型预测喉鳞状细胞癌隐匿性淋巴结转移:一项多中心、回顾性诊断研究
EClinicalMedicine. 2024 Jan 3;67:102385. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102385. eCollection 2024 Jan.
6
Radiomics from dual-energy CT-derived iodine maps predict lymph node metastasis in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.基于双能 CT 碘图的放射组学预测头颈部鳞状细胞癌的淋巴结转移。
Radiol Med. 2024 Feb;129(2):252-267. doi: 10.1007/s11547-023-01750-2. Epub 2023 Nov 28.
7
Diagnostic Accuracy of Up-Front PET/CT and MRI for Detecting Cervical Lymph Node Metastases in T1-T2 Oral Cavity Cancer-A Prospective Cohort Study.upfront PET/CT与MRI对T1-T2期口腔癌颈部淋巴结转移的诊断准确性——一项前瞻性队列研究
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Nov 9;13(22):3414. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13223414.
8
Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced computed tomography in assessing cervical lymph node status in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma.对比增强 CT 对口腔鳞状细胞癌患者颈部淋巴结状态评估的诊断准确性。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023 Dec;149(19):17437-17450. doi: 10.1007/s00432-023-05470-y. Epub 2023 Oct 25.
9
A preoperative nomogram model for the prediction of lymph node metastasis in buccal mucosa cancer.用于预测颊黏膜癌淋巴结转移的术前列线图模型。
Cancer Med. 2023 Jul;12(13):14120-14129. doi: 10.1002/cam4.6076. Epub 2023 May 15.
10
The role of magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography in oral squamous cell carcinoma patients' preoperative staging.磁共振成像和计算机断层扫描在口腔鳞状细胞癌患者术前分期中的作用。
Front Oncol. 2023 Mar 7;13:972042. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.972042. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system 7th edition versus 8th edition: any improvement for patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue?美国癌症联合委员会第 7 版分期系统与第 8 版比较:对舌鳞癌患者有任何改善吗?
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2018 Nov;126(5):415-423. doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2018.07.052. Epub 2018 Aug 18.
2
Metastatic Lymph Node Burden and Survival in Oral Cavity Cancer.口腔癌中转移性淋巴结负荷与生存情况
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Nov 1;35(31):3601-3609. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.71.1176. Epub 2017 Sep 7.
3
Impact of HPV infection on oral squamous cell carcinoma.人乳头瘤病毒感染对口腔鳞状细胞癌的影响。
Oncotarget. 2016 Nov 22;7(47):76704-76712. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.12501.
4
Diagnosing oral squamous cell carcinoma: How much imaging do we really need? A review of the current literature.诊断口腔鳞状细胞癌:我们究竟需要多少影像学检查?当前文献综述。
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2016 May;44(5):538-49. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2016.02.003. Epub 2016 Feb 18.
5
18F fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma with negative neck palpation findings: a prospective study.18F 氟脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描在头颈部鳞状细胞癌伴阴性颈部触诊结果中的应用:一项前瞻性研究。
Radiology. 2014 Apr;271(1):153-61. doi: 10.1148/radiol.13131470. Epub 2013 Nov 23.
6
Lymph node density in oral cavity cancer: results of the International Consortium for Outcomes Research.口腔癌中的淋巴结密度:国际结局研究联合会的研究结果。
Br J Cancer. 2013 Oct 15;109(8):2087-95. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2013.570. Epub 2013 Sep 24.
7
Effectiveness of PET/CT in the preoperative evaluation of neck disease.PET/CT 在颈部疾病术前评估中的应用效果。
Laryngoscope. 2014 Jan;124(1):159-64. doi: 10.1002/lary.24329. Epub 2013 Sep 19.
8
The recurrence and survival of oral squamous cell carcinoma: a report of 275 cases.口腔鳞状细胞癌的复发与生存情况:275例报告
Chin J Cancer. 2013 Nov;32(11):614-8. doi: 10.5732/cjc.012.10219. Epub 2013 Apr 19.
9
Diagnostic value of only 18F-fluorodeocyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography-positive lymph nodes in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.仅 18F-氟代脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描阳性淋巴结对头颈鳞状细胞癌的诊断价值。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012 Oct;147(4):692-8. doi: 10.1177/0194599812443040. Epub 2012 Apr 24.
10
Oral cancer: enduring characteristics and emerging trends.口腔癌:持久特征与新趋势
J Tenn Dent Assoc. 2011 Spring;91(2):24-7; quiz 28-9.

口腔鳞状细胞癌的颈部淋巴结转移——我们需要多少影像学检查?

Cervical Lymph Node Metastases in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma-How Much Imaging Do We Need?

作者信息

Laimer Johannes, Lauinger Anke, Steinmassl Otto, Offermanns Vincent, Grams Astrid E, Zelger Bettina, Bruckmoser Emanuel

机构信息

University Hospital for Cranio-Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria.

University Hospital for Neuroradiology, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria.

出版信息

Diagnostics (Basel). 2020 Apr 2;10(4):199. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics10040199.

DOI:10.3390/diagnostics10040199
PMID:32252409
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7235857/
Abstract

Cervical lymph node metastases in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) are key predictors of disease specific survival. It was therefore the aim of this study to evaluate how much imaging is minimally needed for reliable and efficient identification of cervical lymph node metastases. In this retrospective cross-sectional study, results (metastasis yes/no) of ultrasound (US), computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and positron emission tomography (PET) were compared to the final histopathological results of the corresponding neck dissection (ND) specimens (metastasis yes/no). A score was calculated to account for cervical lymph node size, shape, clustering, peripheral enhancement, hilus sign, architecture, blood flow, and central necrosis. Sensitivity and specificity were analyzed for each imaging technique separately. In 164 patients diagnosed with OSCC, 96 underwent uni- or bilateral ND (122 ND in total). One hundred percent sensitivity was achieved by CT+MRI, MRI+PET, US+CT+MRI, US+MRI+PET, CT+MRI+PET, and US+CT+MRI+PET. The highest specificity was realized by US with 79% (95% CI [0.698-0.890]). Specificity for CT+MRI and PET+MRI was 51% (95% CI [0.359-0.665]) and 70% (95% CI [0.416-0.984]), respectively. Regarding 100% sensitivity with acceptable specificity, the combination of CT+MRI or PET+MRI appeared to be suitable for staging cervical lymph nodes in primary OSCC.

摘要

口腔鳞状细胞癌(OSCC)中的颈部淋巴结转移是疾病特异性生存的关键预测指标。因此,本研究的目的是评估为可靠且高效地识别颈部淋巴结转移最少需要多少影像学检查。在这项回顾性横断面研究中,将超声(US)、计算机断层扫描(CT)、磁共振成像(MRI)和正电子发射断层扫描(PET)的结果(转移与否)与相应颈部清扫(ND)标本的最终组织病理学结果(转移与否)进行了比较。计算了一个分数来考量颈部淋巴结的大小、形状、聚集情况、周边强化、门部征、结构、血流和中央坏死。分别对每种成像技术的敏感性和特异性进行了分析。在164例诊断为OSCC的患者中,96例接受了单侧或双侧ND(总共122次ND)。CT+MRI、MRI+PET、US+CT+MRI、US+MRI+PET、CT+MRI+PET和US+CT+MRI+PET的敏感性达到了100%。US的特异性最高,为79%(95%可信区间[0.698 - 0.890])。CT+MRI和PET+MRI的特异性分别为51%(95%可信区间[0.359 - 0.665])和70%(95%可信区间[0.416 - 0.984])。关于具有可接受特异性的100%敏感性,CT+MRI或PET+MRI的组合似乎适用于原发性OSCC颈部淋巴结的分期。