Suppr超能文献

在上颌采用All-on-4概念比较四颗种植体固位覆盖义齿和种植体支持固定义齿在患者满意度、生活质量和边缘骨丢失方面的情况:一项为期2年的回顾性研究。

Comparison of four-implant-retained overdentures and implant-supported fixed prostheses using the All-on-4 concept in the maxilla in terms of patient satisfaction, quality of life, and marginal bone loss: a 2-year retrospective study.

作者信息

Mumcu Emre, Dayan Suleyman Cagatay, Genceli Emrah, Geckili Onur

出版信息

Quintessence Int. 2020;51(5):388-396. doi: 10.3290/j.qi.a44368.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of the present study was to compare and assess maxillary edentulous patients treated with four-implant-retained overdentures and with implant-supported fixed prostheses using the All-on-4 concept in terms of patient satisfaction, oral health-related quality of life, and marginal bone loss.

METHOD AND MATERIALS

Thirty-three patients treated with either maxillary four-implant-retained overdentures (n = 15) or with maxillary implant-supported fixed prosthesis using the All-on-4 concept (n = 18) were compared in terms of patient satisfaction, quality of life, and marginal bone loss. Independent sample t test was used to compare the two groups in terms of satisfaction, OHIP-14 scores, and marginal bone loss. The paired sample t test was used to compare bone loss at different time intervals. The comparison of marginal bone loss with regard to implant location was accomplished with the one-way ANOVA test. P values of < .05 were considered as statistically significant.

RESULTS

No statistically significant differences were found between the two groups' OHIP-14 scores (P > .05). When patient satisfaction scores were evaluated, hygiene maintenance (P = .001) and pain scores (P = .001) were significantly higher in the implant-retained overdenture group than in the implant-supported fixed prosthesis group (P < .05). No statistically significant difference was observed between axial and tilted implants at both the 12-month (P = .59) and 24-month (P = .77) follow-up periods in the implant-supported fixed prosthesis group.

CONCLUSION

Four-implant-supported fixed prostheses with the All-on-4 concept and four-implant-retained overdentures present similar marginal bone loss and quality of life scores after 2 years of function. However, patients found overdentures easier to clean but more painful in comparison with the fixed prosthesis.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是比较和评估使用四颗种植体支持的覆盖义齿和采用All-on-4概念的种植体支持固定义齿治疗的上颌无牙颌患者在患者满意度、口腔健康相关生活质量和边缘骨吸收方面的情况。

方法和材料

比较了33例接受上颌四颗种植体支持覆盖义齿治疗(n = 15)或采用All-on-4概念的上颌种植体支持固定义齿治疗(n = 18)的患者在患者满意度、生活质量和边缘骨吸收方面的情况。采用独立样本t检验比较两组在满意度、OHIP-14评分和边缘骨吸收方面的差异。采用配对样本t检验比较不同时间间隔的骨吸收情况。采用单因素方差分析检验比较种植体位置的边缘骨吸收情况。P值<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。

结果

两组的OHIP-14评分之间未发现统计学显著差异(P>0.05)。在评估患者满意度评分时,种植体支持覆盖义齿组的口腔卫生维护(P = 0.001)和疼痛评分(P = 0.001)显著高于种植体支持固定义齿组(P<0.05)。在种植体支持固定义齿组的12个月(P = 0.59)和24个月(P = 0.77)随访期,轴向种植体和倾斜种植体之间均未观察到统计学显著差异。

结论

采用All-on-4概念的四颗种植体支持固定义齿和四颗种植体支持覆盖义齿在功能2年后呈现相似的边缘骨吸收和生活质量评分。然而,与固定义齿相比,患者发现覆盖义齿更容易清洁,但疼痛更明显。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验