• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

城市觅食:土地管理政策、观点和潜力。

Urban foraging: Land management policy, perspectives, and potential.

机构信息

Rhodes University, Grahamstown, South Africa.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2020 Apr 7;15(4):e0230693. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230693. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0230693
PMID:32255778
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7138303/
Abstract

Gathering of uncultivated food from green spaces, also known as foraging, is observed in urban areas across the world, but the literature focuses predominantly on the global north. Our study examines the existing urban land management structure and its approach to urban foraging in the eastern coastal region of South Africa. Through interviews with municipal officials in nine cities, we identified different stakeholders and their roles in urban green space management. We then used network analysis to represent interactions and influence of these stakeholders, and environmental worldviews to determine organisational and perceptual barriers to and enablers of foraging in urban green spaces. The policy on urban green space management, as well as land managers themselves are amenable to the concept of foraging in public spaces. Lack of knowledge on wild indigenous species and sustainable offtake, ambiguous, coarse, or lacking policy, and normative views of pristine nature may hinder foraging. We recommend pathways for policy and stakeholder partnerships to incorporate sustainable foraging in their biodiversity conservation and land stewardship strategies.

摘要

从绿地中采集未栽培的食物,也称为觅食,在世界各地的城市中都有观察到,但文献主要集中在全球北方。我们的研究考察了南非东部沿海地区现有的城市土地管理结构及其对城市觅食的处理方式。通过对九个城市的市政官员进行访谈,我们确定了不同的利益相关者及其在城市绿地管理中的角色。然后,我们使用网络分析来表示这些利益相关者的相互作用和影响,并使用环境世界观来确定城市绿地觅食的组织和感知障碍以及促进因素。城市绿地管理政策以及土地管理者本身都倾向于在公共空间中接受觅食的概念。缺乏对野生本土物种的知识和可持续的采食量、政策模糊、粗糙或缺乏、以及对原始自然的规范观念可能会阻碍觅食。我们建议通过政策和利益相关者合作,为可持续觅食纳入其生物多样性保护和土地管理战略的途径。

相似文献

1
Urban foraging: Land management policy, perspectives, and potential.城市觅食:土地管理政策、观点和潜力。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 7;15(4):e0230693. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230693. eCollection 2020.
2
Urban foraging in Brazilian public greenspaces.巴西公共绿地的城市觅食
Ambio. 2023 Jul;52(7):1248-1261. doi: 10.1007/s13280-023-01847-y. Epub 2023 Mar 21.
3
Contrasting effects of visiting urban green-space and the countryside on biodiversity knowledge and conservation support.参观城市绿地和乡村对生物多样性知识及保护支持的对比影响。
PLoS One. 2017 Mar 23;12(3):e0174376. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174376. eCollection 2017.
4
Multilevel Analysis of Municipal Officials' Participation in Land Use Policies Supportive of Active Living: City and Individual Factors.市级官员参与支持积极生活的土地使用政策的多层次分析:城市和个人因素
Am J Health Promot. 2016 Mar;30(4):287-90. doi: 10.1177/0890117116639571.
5
Environmental Management in the Peri-urban Region: Psychological and Contextual Factors Influencing Private Land Conservation Actions.城乡交错带的环境管理:影响私人土地保护行为的心理和情境因素。
Environ Manage. 2021 Aug;68(2):184-197. doi: 10.1007/s00267-021-01487-6. Epub 2021 Jun 14.
6
Governance and policy limitations for sustainable urban land planning. The case of Mexico.城市土地可持续规划的治理与政策限制——以墨西哥为例。
J Environ Manage. 2020 Apr 1;259:109575. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109575. Epub 2019 Dec 24.
7
Urban nature at the fingertips: Investigating wild food foraging to enable nature interactions of urban dwellers.指尖上的城市自然:调查野生食物采集以促进城市居民的自然互动。
Ambio. 2022 May;51(5):1168-1178. doi: 10.1007/s13280-021-01648-1. Epub 2021 Oct 28.
8
Mammal diversity and metacommunity dynamics in urban green spaces: implications for urban wildlife conservation.哺乳动物多样性和城市绿地的复合种群动态:对城市野生动物保护的启示。
Ecol Appl. 2017 Dec;27(8):2330-2341. doi: 10.1002/eap.1611. Epub 2017 Oct 20.
9
Mapping environmentally sustainable urban development within six US cities through object-based image change analysis of aerial orthoimagery.通过基于对象的航空正射影像图像变化分析,在六个美国城市中规划环境可持续的城市发展。
Environ Monit Assess. 2023 Mar 15;195(4):469. doi: 10.1007/s10661-023-11075-2.
10
Biodiversity within the city: Effects of land sharing and land sparing urban development on avian diversity.城市中的生物多样性:土地共享和土地分离的城市发展对鸟类多样性的影响。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Mar 10;707:135477. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135477. Epub 2019 Nov 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Analysing the contribution of trees and green spaces to household nutrition security in eThekwini, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.分析南非夸祖鲁-纳塔尔省伊泰夸尼市树木和绿地对家庭营养安全的贡献。
Front Sustain Food Syst. 2024 Nov 25;8. doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2024.1451656.
2
The Contribution of Trees and Green Spaces to Household Food Security in eThekwini Metro, KwaZulu-Natal.夸祖鲁-纳塔尔省伊泰夸尼市树木和绿地对家庭粮食安全的贡献
Sustainability. 2023 Mar 9;15(6):4855. doi: 10.3390/su15064855.
3
Spatial synergies for urban foraging: A South African example.

本文引用的文献

1
Geographic factors predict wild food and nonfood NTFP collection by households across four African countries.地理因素预测了四个非洲国家家庭对野生食用和非食用非木材林产品的采集情况。
For Policy Econ. 2018 Nov;96:38-53. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2018.08.002.
2
Exploring the dynamics of research collaborations by mapping social networks in invasion science.通过绘制入侵科学中的社会网络来探索研究合作的动态。
J Environ Manage. 2019 Jan 1;229:27-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.06.051. Epub 2018 Jun 19.
3
Social Network Analysis Identifies Key Participants in Conservation Development.
城市觅食的空间协同效应:以南非为例。
Ambio. 2025 Apr;54(4):714-733. doi: 10.1007/s13280-024-02094-5. Epub 2024 Nov 26.
4
Exploring Key Factors Driving Urban Foraging Behavior in Garden and Non-Garden Locations.探索驱动花园和非花园地点城市觅食行为的关键因素。
Foods. 2023 Feb 28;12(5):1032. doi: 10.3390/foods12051032.
5
The nexus between traditional foraging and its sustainability: a qualitative assessment among a few selected Eurasian case studies.传统觅食方式与其可持续性之间的联系:对一些选定的欧亚案例研究的定性评估
Environ Dev Sustain. 2022 Jul 28:1-26. doi: 10.1007/s10668-022-02568-0.
6
Trees and their seed networks: The social dynamics of urban fruit trees and implications for genetic diversity.树木及其种子网络:城市果树的社会动态及其对遗传多样性的影响。
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 16;16(3):e0243017. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243017. eCollection 2021.
社会网络分析确定保护发展的关键参与者。
Environ Manage. 2018 May;61(5):732-740. doi: 10.1007/s00267-018-1017-6. Epub 2018 Mar 3.
4
NTFP harvesters as citizen scientists: Validating traditional and crowdsourced knowledge on seed production of Brazil nut trees in the Peruvian Amazon.非木材森林产品采集者作为公民科学家:验证秘鲁亚马逊地区巴西坚果树种子生产的传统知识和众包知识。
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 24;12(8):e0183743. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183743. eCollection 2017.
5
Understanding conservationists' perspectives on the new-conservation debate.理解自然资源保护主义者对新保护主义辩论的观点。
Conserv Biol. 2017 Apr;31(2):353-363. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12811. Epub 2016 Nov 30.
6
Sample Size in Qualitative Interview Studies: Guided by Information Power.定性访谈研究中的样本量:以信息力为导向
Qual Health Res. 2016 Nov;26(13):1753-1760. doi: 10.1177/1049732315617444. Epub 2016 Jul 10.
7
Explaining the resurgent popularity of the wild: motivations for wild plant gathering in the Biosphere Reserve Grosses Walsertal, Austria.解读对荒野日益增长的喜爱:奥地利大瓦尔瑟谷生物圈保护区野生植物采集的动机
J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2015 Jun 30;11:55. doi: 10.1186/s13002-015-0032-4.
8
The evidence and values underlying 'new conservation'.
Trends Ecol Evol. 2014 Mar;29(3):131-2. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2014.01.005. Epub 2014 Feb 10.
9
Reconciling food production and biodiversity conservation: land sharing and land sparing compared.协调粮食生产与生物多样性保护:土地共享与土地分离的比较。
Science. 2011 Sep 2;333(6047):1289-91. doi: 10.1126/science.1208742.
10
Applying network analysis to the conservation of habitat trees in urban environments: a case study from Brisbane, Australia.将网络分析应用于城市环境中栖息地树木的保护:以澳大利亚布里斯班为例的研究
Conserv Biol. 2006 Jun;20(3):861-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00415.x.