• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

朋友还是敌人?活动家和非活动家如何看待和评价彼此。

Friends or foes? How activists and non-activists perceive and evaluate each other.

机构信息

Department of Social Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany.

Department of Social Psychology, Faculty of Behavioural and Social Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2020 Apr 7;15(4):e0230918. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230918. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0230918
PMID:32255779
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7138314/
Abstract

Little is known about how activists and non-activists perceive and evaluate each other. This is important because activists often depend on societal support to achieve their goals. We examined these perceptions and evaluations in three field experiments set in different contexts, i.e., student protests in the Netherlands 2014/2015 (Study 1, activist sample N = 190; Study 2, non-activist sample N = 145), and environmental protests in Paris in 2015 (Study 3, activist sample N = 112). Through a scenario method, we manipulated the motivations expressed for (in)action by a member of the other group (i.e., an activist or non-activist) and measured individuals' perceptions and evaluations. Findings showed that activists perceived a non-activist as selfish and felt personally distant to them, especially when a non-activist dismissed moral obligation for action (Study 1 and 3). By contrast, non-activists had a rather positive view of activists, especially in response to an activist communicating collective concerns for action (Study 2). Study 4 (N = 103) further supported this pattern of findings by showing that activists perceived larger intergroup differences than non-activists. We conclude that mutual perceptions and evaluations of activists and non-activists are asymmetrical, which may have (negative) consequences for mobilization for social change.

摘要

对于活动家和非活动家如何相互感知和评价,人们知之甚少。这一点很重要,因为活动家往往需要社会支持才能实现自己的目标。我们通过三个在不同背景下进行的现场实验来研究这些看法和评价,这些背景包括:2014/2015 年荷兰的学生抗议活动(研究 1,活动家样本 N=190;研究 2,非活动家样本 N=145),以及 2015 年巴黎的环境抗议活动(研究 3,活动家样本 N=112)。通过情景方法,我们操纵了另一个群体(即活动家或非活动家)成员为(不)行动表达的动机,并测量了个人的感知和评价。研究结果表明,活动家认为非活动家是自私的,并与他们产生了个人上的疏远,尤其是当非活动家否认行动的道德义务时(研究 1 和 3)。相比之下,非活动家对活动家的看法较为积极,尤其是在活动家表达对行动的集体关注时(研究 2)。研究 4(N=103)通过进一步证实了这一发现模式,表明活动家比非活动家感知到更大的群体间差异。我们得出结论,活动家和非活动家之间的相互感知和评价是不对称的,这可能对社会变革的动员产生(负面)影响。

相似文献

1
Friends or foes? How activists and non-activists perceive and evaluate each other.朋友还是敌人?活动家和非活动家如何看待和评价彼此。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 7;15(4):e0230918. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230918. eCollection 2020.
2
If it matters for the group then it matters to me: collective action outcomes for seasoned activists.如果这对群体很重要,那么对我也很重要:有经验的活动家的集体行动结果。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2012 Mar;51(1):72-92. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8309.2010.02001.x. Epub 2011 Feb 5.
3
My Fight or Yours: Stereotypes of Activists From Advantaged and Disadvantaged Groups.我的战斗还是你的战斗:来自优势和劣势群体的活动家的刻板印象。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2023 Jan;49(1):110-124. doi: 10.1177/01461672211060124. Epub 2021 Dec 29.
4
An exploratory study of the relationship between college student activists' labor and their subjective well-being: Perspectives from a U.S. Institution.大学生活动家的劳动与其主观幸福感之间关系的探索性研究:来自一所美国机构的视角。
J Am Coll Health. 2024 Apr 16:1-10. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2024.2338409.
5
How risk perception shapes collective action intentions in repressive contexts: A study of Egyptian activists during the 2013 post-coup uprising.在镇压环境中风险认知如何塑造集体行动意图:对2013年政变后起义期间埃及活动人士的一项研究。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2016 Dec;55(4):700-721. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12164. Epub 2016 Oct 3.
6
Friend or ally: whether cross-group contact undermines collective action depends on what advantaged group members say (or don't say).是敌是友:跨群体接触是否会破坏集体行动,取决于优势群体成员的言行。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2013 Apr;39(4):442-55. doi: 10.1177/0146167213477155.
7
Families of Animal Rights Activists as a Basis of Support for Ideological Delinquency-A Phenomenological Study.动物权利活动家的家庭作为支持意识形态犯罪的基础:一项现象学研究。
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2021 Feb;65(2-3):159-179. doi: 10.1177/0306624X20944694. Epub 2020 Jul 25.
8
Resources that Help Sustain Environmental Volunteer Activist Leaders.有助于维持环境志愿者活动领导者的资源。
Voluntas. 2023 Mar 1:1-11. doi: 10.1007/s11266-023-00561-3.
9
Strategies for Supporting Student Activists as Leaders.支持学生激进分子成为领导者的策略。
New Dir Stud Leadersh. 2019 Mar;2019(161):89-96. doi: 10.1002/yd.20323.
10
The Radicalization of Brexit Activists.英国脱欧激进分子的激进化
Front Psychol. 2022 Feb 9;12:798232. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.798232. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
Applying the Dynamic Dual Pathway Model of Approach Coping to Collective Action Among Advantaged Group Allies and Disadvantaged Group Members.将应对方式的动态双路径模型应用于优势群体盟友和弱势群体成员之间的集体行动。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jun 6;13:875848. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.875848. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Recycling Alone or Protesting Together? Values as a Basis for Pro-environmental Social Change Actions.独自回收还是共同抗议?价值观作为亲环境社会变革行动的基础。
Front Psychol. 2018 Jul 26;9:1229. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01229. eCollection 2018.
2
The Importance of Protesters' Morals: Moral Obligation as a Key Variable to Understand Collective Action.抗议者道德的重要性:道德义务作为理解集体行动的关键变量
Front Psychol. 2018 Mar 27;9:418. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00418. eCollection 2018.
3
The moral dimension of politicized identity: Exploring identity content during the 2012 Presidential Elections in the USA.政治化身份的道德维度:探究2012年美国大选期间的身份内容
Br J Soc Psychol. 2017 Jun;56(2):416-436. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12171. Epub 2016 Nov 11.
4
Acting in solidarity: Testing an extended dual pathway model of collective action by bystander group members.团结一致行动:通过旁观者群体成员检验集体行动的扩展双重途径模型。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2015 Sep;54(3):539-60. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12095. Epub 2014 Nov 19.
5
Committed dis(s)idents: participation in radical collective action fosters disidentification with the broader in-group but enhances political identification.坚定的异见者:参与激进的集体行动会促进与更广泛的内群体的脱认同,但会增强政治认同。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2011 Aug;37(8):1104-16. doi: 10.1177/0146167211407076. Epub 2011 May 4.
6
If it matters for the group then it matters to me: collective action outcomes for seasoned activists.如果这对群体很重要,那么对我也很重要:有经验的活动家的集体行动结果。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2012 Mar;51(1):72-92. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8309.2010.02001.x. Epub 2011 Feb 5.
7
The political solidarity model of social change: dynamics of self-categorization in intergroup power relations.社会变革的政治团结模式:群体间权力关系中的自我归类动态
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2008 Nov;12(4):330-52. doi: 10.1177/1088868308323223.
8
Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: a quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives.迈向集体行动的综合社会认同模型:三种社会心理学视角的定量研究综述
Psychol Bull. 2008 Jul;134(4):504-35. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.504.
9
The role of efficacy and moral outrage norms in creating the potential for international development activism through group-based interaction.功效规范和道德义愤规范在通过群体互动创造国际发展行动主义潜力方面的作用。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2009 Mar;48(Pt 1):115-34. doi: 10.1348/014466608X313774. Epub 2008 Jun 3.
10
Exploring the psychological underpinnings of the moral mandate effect: motivated reasoning, group differentiation, or anger?探究道德命令效应的心理基础:动机性推理、群体分化还是愤怒?
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006 Apr;90(4):629-43. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.90.4.629.