Department of Pharmacy, Quaid-i-azam University Islamabad, Pakistan.
Department of Pharmacy, Administration and Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, Health Science Centre, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 7;15(4):e0231188. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231188. eCollection 2020.
An audit of the antibiotic prophylaxis in surgical procedures is the basic area of antimicrobial stewardship programme. The current research aimed to evaluate the adherence-proportion of the pre-operative antibiotic prophylaxis (PAP) practices in common elective surgical procedures. It was an eight-month (January 2017 to August 2017) observational cross-sectional patients' treatment record-based study conducted at two tertiary care teaching hospitals of Islamabad, Pakistan. We investigated the three most commonly performed elective general surgical procedures at the hospitals in adults aged > 18 years with no previous infection or surgery. The required data were extracted from the medical charts. Current prescribing practices were compared with the standard prescribing guidelines. A total of 660 (Government Hospital (GH), n = 330 and Private Hospital (PH), n = 330) procedures were observed. The most commonly performed elective general surgical procedures were laparoscopic cholecystectomy 307/660 (46.5%), followed by direct inguinal hernia 197/660 (29.8%) and total thyroidectomy 156/660 (23.6%). Non-use of PAP was observed in 64/660 (9.7%) cases. PAP was given to 90.3% (n = 596/660) cases (300/330 (90.9%) patients in GH and 296/330 (89.7%) in PH; P = 0.599). Based on the existing guidelines, the choice of antibiotics was correct in only 4.2% (25/596) patients (10/300; 3.3% cases at GH and 15/296; 5% at PH). The appropriate use of antibiotics was significantly greater in direct inguinal hernia (n = 19/193; 9.8%) cases compared with that in total thyroidectomy (n = 4/152; 2.6%) and laparoscopic cholecystectomy (n = 2/251; 0.8%) cases; P = 0.001. Compliance to the timing was only 51% (n = 304/596) of the total patients received PAP which was significantly lower in GH 97/300 (32.3%) as compared with that in PH 207/296 (69.9%); P = 0.001. Administration timing of antibiotics was observed to be more appropriate in total thyroidectomy (n = 79/152; 51.9%) cases than in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (n = 130/251; 51.8%) and direct inguinal hernia (n = 95/193; 49.2%) cases; P = 0.001. The route and dose were appropriate in accordance with the guidelines in all cases (100%). Most of the patients received ceftriaxone, a third-generation cephalosporin that is no longer recommended by the latest international guidelines. The current analysis revealed an alarmingly poor adherence rate with the guidelines in the three elective surgical procedures at both hospitals. To improve the situation, training and awareness programs about the antimicrobial stewardship interventions on the institutional level may be valuable.
手术中抗生素预防的审核是抗菌药物管理计划的基本领域。目前的研究旨在评估常见择期手术中术前抗生素预防(PAP)实践的依从率。这是一项在巴基斯坦伊斯兰堡的两家三级教学医院进行的为期八个月(2017 年 1 月至 2017 年 8 月)的观察性横断面患者治疗记录研究。我们调查了医院中 18 岁以上无既往感染或手术的成年人中最常见的三种普通外科手术。所需数据从病历中提取。目前的处方实践与标准处方指南进行了比较。共观察了 660 例(政府医院(GH),n=330 例和私立医院(PH),n=330 例)手术。最常见的择期普通外科手术是腹腔镜胆囊切除术 307/660(46.5%),其次是直接腹股沟疝 197/660(29.8%)和甲状腺全切除术 156/660(23.6%)。在 64/660(9.7%)例中未使用 PAP。90.3%(n=596/660)的病例给予了 PAP(300/330(90.9%)GH 患者和 296/330(89.7%)PH 患者;P=0.599)。根据现有指南,抗生素的选择仅在 4.2%(25/596)患者(10/300;3.3%GH 病例和 15/296;5%PH 病例)中正确。与腹腔镜胆囊切除术(n=2/251;0.8%)和直接腹股沟疝(n=2/193;0.9%)相比,在直接腹股沟疝(n=19/193;9.8%)病例中抗生素的正确使用明显更大;P=0.001。接受 PAP 的总患者中只有 51%(n=304/596)符合规定的时间,这在 GH 中明显较低(97/300;32.3%)与 PH 中(207/296;69.9%)相比;P=0.001。抗生素的给药时间在甲状腺全切除术(n=79/152;51.9%)病例中比腹腔镜胆囊切除术(n=130/251;51.8%)和直接腹股沟疝(n=95/193;49.2%)病例中更合适;P=0.001。所有病例的途径和剂量均符合指南规定(100%)。大多数患者接受头孢曲松,这是一种第三代头孢菌素,最新的国际指南不再推荐使用。目前的分析显示,两家医院的三种择期手术中,指南的依从率低得令人震惊。为了改善这种情况,在机构层面上开展关于抗菌药物管理干预的培训和意识计划可能会很有价值。