• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

公共资助的儿童保育对父母幸福感的影响:来自截止规则的证据。

The Impact of Publicly Funded Childcare on Parental Well-Being: Evidence from Cut-Off Rules.

作者信息

Schmitz Sophia

机构信息

DIW Berlin, Mohrenstrasse 58, 10117 Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Eur J Popul. 2019 Apr 29;36(2):171-196. doi: 10.1007/s10680-019-09526-z. eCollection 2020 Apr.

DOI:10.1007/s10680-019-09526-z
PMID:32256256
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7113341/
Abstract

As more and more countries consider expanding public childcare provision, it is important to have a comprehensive understanding of its implications for families. This article adds to the existing literature by investigating the effect of publicly funded childcare on parental subjective well-being. To establish causality, I exploit cut-off rules introduced following the implementation of a legal claim to childcare in Germany. The results suggest that childcare provision strongly increases the life satisfaction of mothers who were previously constrained by the lack of childcare supply. The effect is more pronounced for mothers with higher labour market attachment. The coefficients for fathers are smaller and not statistically significant. As potential mechanisms, a wide range of time-use and labour market outcomes are explored. This shows that mothers indeed shift time from non-market activities to formal work in response to childcare eligibility, resulting in direct and indirect pecuniary and non-pecuniary returns to maternal life satisfaction. The findings shed light on key issues of work-family reconciliation and stress the importance of considering subjective well-being measures in family policy evaluations.

摘要

随着越来越多的国家考虑扩大公共托儿服务,全面了解其对家庭的影响非常重要。本文通过研究公共资助托儿服务对父母主观幸福感的影响,为现有文献增添了内容。为了确定因果关系,我利用了德国实施托儿服务法定权利后引入的截止规则。结果表明,托儿服务的提供极大地提高了那些此前因托儿服务供应不足而受限的母亲的生活满意度。对于劳动力市场参与度较高的母亲,这种影响更为明显。父亲的系数较小且无统计学意义。作为潜在机制,我们探索了广泛的时间利用和劳动力市场结果。这表明,母亲们确实会因符合托儿服务资格而将时间从非市场活动转移到正式工作中,从而为母亲的生活满意度带来直接和间接的金钱及非金钱回报。这些发现揭示了工作与家庭协调的关键问题,并强调了在家庭政策评估中考虑主观幸福感指标的重要性。

相似文献

1
The Impact of Publicly Funded Childcare on Parental Well-Being: Evidence from Cut-Off Rules.公共资助的儿童保育对父母幸福感的影响:来自截止规则的证据。
Eur J Popul. 2019 Apr 29;36(2):171-196. doi: 10.1007/s10680-019-09526-z. eCollection 2020 Apr.
2
Do high childcare costs and low access to Head Start and childcare subsidies limit mothers' employment? A state-level analysis.高育儿成本和低获得“开端计划”和儿童保育补贴是否限制了母亲的就业?一项州级分析。
Soc Sci Res. 2022 Feb;102:102627. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2021.102627. Epub 2021 Aug 18.
3
Relationship satisfaction and family routines of young parents before and during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic: A latent growth curve analysis.新冠疫情大流行前后第一年年轻父母的关系满意度和家庭常规:潜增长曲线分析。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 16;19(2):e0297740. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297740. eCollection 2024.
4
Maternal employment and childcare during infancy and childhood overweight.母亲就业和婴幼儿期的儿童保育与超重。
Soc Sci Med. 2019 Dec;243:112639. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112639. Epub 2019 Oct 24.
5
'Intelligent' lockdown, intelligent effects? Results from a survey on gender (in)equality in paid work, the division of childcare and household work, and quality of life among parents in the Netherlands during the Covid-19 lockdown.“智能”封锁,智能影响?荷兰新冠封锁期间,针对带薪工作中的性别(不平等)、儿童保育和家务分工以及父母生活质量的一项调查结果。
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 30;15(11):e0242249. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242249. eCollection 2020.
6
PARENTS' WORK HOURS AND CHILDCARE DECISIONS: EXPLOITING A TIME WINDFALL.父母的工作时间与儿童保育决策:利用时间意外之财
Res Labor Econ. 2023;51:135-159. doi: 10.1108/s0147-912120230000051006. Epub 2023 Dec 14.
7
Relationship between paternal psychological distress and involvement in childcare among fathers of preschool-aged children: mediating effect of maternal psychological distress.父亲心理困扰与学龄前儿童父亲育儿参与度的关系:母亲心理困扰的中介作用。
BMC Pediatr. 2019 Sep 3;19(1):308. doi: 10.1186/s12887-019-1688-z.
8
Associations of formal childcare use with health and human capital development for adolescent mothers and their children in South Africa: A cross-sectional study.南非青少年母亲及其子女的正规儿童保育使用与健康和人力资本发展的关联:一项横断面研究。
Child Care Health Dev. 2024 Jan;50(1):e13138. doi: 10.1111/cch.13138. Epub 2023 Jun 7.
9
Childcare and maternal part-time employment: a natural experiment using Swiss cantons.儿童保育与母亲兼职工作:一项基于瑞士各州的自然实验
Swiss J Econ Stat. 2018;154(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s41937-017-0003-x. Epub 2018 Jul 3.
10
Parental characteristics associated with childcare use during the first 4 years of life: results from a representative cohort of Québec families.与儿童生命头 4 年期间育儿使用相关的父母特征:魁北克家庭的代表性队列研究结果。
Can J Public Health. 2012 Jan-Feb;103(1):76-80. doi: 10.1007/BF03404073.

引用本文的文献

1
Childcare disruptions and maternal health during the COVID-19 pandemic.新冠疫情期间的儿童保育中断与孕产妇健康
Health Aff Sch. 2024 May 21;2(5):qxae061. doi: 10.1093/haschl/qxae061. eCollection 2024 May.
2
Family-friendly work conditions and well-being among Malaysian women.马来西亚女性的家庭友好型工作条件和福祉。
Womens Health (Lond). 2024 Jan-Dec;20:17455057241233113. doi: 10.1177/17455057241233113.
3
Parents under stress: Evaluating emergency childcare policies during the first COVID-19 lockdown in Germany.处于压力下的父母:评估德国首次新冠疫情封锁期间的紧急儿童保育政策。
Labour Econ. 2022 Oct;78:102217. doi: 10.1016/j.labeco.2022.102217. Epub 2022 Jul 8.
4
Parental well-being in times of Covid-19 in Germany.德国新冠疫情期间父母的幸福状况。
Rev Econ Househ. 2021;19(1):91-122. doi: 10.1007/s11150-020-09529-4. Epub 2021 Jan 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Parenthood and Life Satisfaction in Europe: The Role of Family Policies and Working Time Flexibility.欧洲的为人父母与生活满意度:家庭政策和工作时间灵活性的作用。
Eur J Popul. 2017 Jul 19;34(3):387-411. doi: 10.1007/s10680-017-9433-5. eCollection 2018 Aug.
2
When is the Second One Coming? The Effect of Couple's Subjective Well-Being Following the Onset of Parenthood.第二个孩子什么时候来?为人父母后夫妻主观幸福感的变化
Eur J Popul. 2016 Sep 1;32(3):421-444. doi: 10.1007/s10680-016-9388-y. eCollection 2016 Aug.
3
It Takes Two to Tango: Couples' Happiness and Childbearing.一个巴掌拍不响:夫妻幸福与生育
Eur J Popul. 2016 Aug 22;32(3):339-354. doi: 10.1007/s10680-016-9385-1. eCollection 2016 Aug.
4
Parenthood and Happiness: Effects of Work-Family Reconciliation Policies in 22 OECD Countries.为人父母与幸福:经合组织22个国家工作与家庭协调政策的影响
AJS. 2016 Nov;122(3):886-929. doi: 10.1086/688892.
5
How Can Measures of Subjective Well-Being Be Used to Inform Public Policy?主观幸福感的衡量标准如何用于为公共政策提供信息?
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2007 Mar;2(1):71-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00030.x.
6
Investing in Preschool Programs.投资学前教育项目。
J Econ Perspect. 2013 Spring;27(2):109-132. doi: 10.1257/jep.27.2.109.
7
Memory: a contribution to experimental psychology.《记忆:对实验心理学的一项贡献》
Ann Neurosci. 2013 Oct;20(4):155-6. doi: 10.5214/ans.0972.7531.200408.
8
Season of Birth and Later Outcomes: Old Questions, New Answers.出生季节与后期结局:旧问题,新答案。
Rev Econ Stat. 2013 Jul 1;95(3):711-724. doi: 10.1162/REST_a_00314.
9
Child care subsidies, maternal health, and child-parent interactions: evidence from three nationally representative datasets.儿童保育补贴、孕产妇健康与亲子互动:来自三个全国代表性数据集的证据
Health Econ. 2014 Aug;23(8):894-916. doi: 10.1002/hec.2964. Epub 2013 Jul 8.
10
The Satisfaction With Life Scale.生活满意度量表。
J Pers Assess. 1985 Feb;49(1):71-5. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13.