Klink Katharina, Peter Jessica, Wyss Patric, Klöppel Stefan
University Hospital of Old Age Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Front Aging Neurosci. 2020 Mar 17;12:66. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2020.00066. eCollection 2020.
Associative memory is one of the first cognitive functions negatively affected by healthy and pathological aging processes. Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques are easily administrable tools to support memory. However, the optimal stimulation parameters inducing a reliable positive effect on older adult's memory performance remain mostly unclear. In our randomized, double-blind, cross-over study, 28 healthy older adults (16 females; 71.18 + 6.42 years of age) received anodal transcranial direct (tDCS), alternating current in the theta range (tACS), and sham stimulation over the left ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (VLPFC) each once during encoding. We tested associative memory performance with cued recall and recognition tasks after a retention period and again on the following day. Overall, neither tDCS nor tACS showed effects on associative memory performance. Further analysis revealed a significant difference for performance on the cued recall task under tACS compared to sham when accounting for age. Our results suggest that tACS might be more effective to improve associative memory performance than tDCS in higher aged samples.
联想记忆是健康和病理性衰老过程中最早受到负面影响的认知功能之一。非侵入性脑刺激(NIBS)技术是支持记忆的易于实施的工具。然而,能对老年人记忆表现产生可靠积极影响的最佳刺激参数大多仍不清楚。在我们的随机、双盲、交叉研究中,28名健康老年人(16名女性;年龄71.18±6.42岁)在编码过程中,分别接受了阳极经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)、θ波范围内的交流电刺激(tACS)以及左侧腹外侧前额叶皮层(VLPFC)的假刺激,各一次。在一段保持期后以及次日,我们通过线索回忆和识别任务测试了联想记忆表现。总体而言,tDCS和tACS对联想记忆表现均未显示出效果。进一步分析发现,在考虑年龄因素时,与假刺激相比,tACS下线索回忆任务的表现存在显著差异。我们的结果表明,在年龄较大的样本中,tACS可能比tDCS更有效地改善联想记忆表现。