Huang Jinke, Shen Min, Qin Xiaohui, Guo Weichi, Li Hui
The Second Clinical Medical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Department of Neurology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine (Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences), Guangzhou, China.
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2020 Mar 19;2020:4262910. doi: 10.1155/2020/4262910. eCollection 2020.
Because current evidence regarding the effectiveness of acupuncture for a tension-type headache (TTH) is controversial, we evaluated the reliability of the methodological quality and outcome measures of systematic reviews/meta-analyses (SRs/MAs) on acupuncture for TTH.
We conducted a comprehensive literature search for SRs/MAs in major databases from the database's inception to September 2019. The Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR-2) and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) assessments were used to assess the methodological quality of the included reviews and the quality of evidence, respectively.
Eight reviews were included in the analysis. The AMSTAR-2 assessment results showed that the methodological quality of all included reviews was critically low. Thirty-six outcome measures were included in these reviews. The GRADE results showed that 25 (25/36, 69.4%) outcomes provided low- or very low-quality evidence, four (4/36, 11.1%) provided moderate-quality evidence, and seven (7/36, 19.4%) provided high-quality evidence. Descriptive analysis results showed that acupuncture treatment for TTH reduced headache frequency and severity.
Acupuncture appears to be an effective treatment modality for TTH, but the credibility of the results is limited owing to the generally low methodological quality and evidence quality in the included SRs/MAs.
由于目前关于针灸治疗紧张型头痛(TTH)有效性的证据存在争议,我们评估了针灸治疗TTH的系统评价/荟萃分析(SRs/MAs)的方法学质量和结局指标的可靠性。
我们在主要数据库中进行了全面的文献检索,以查找从数据库创建到2019年9月的SRs/MAs。分别使用系统评价方法学质量2(AMSTAR-2)和推荐分级、评估、制定与评价(GRADE)评估来评估纳入评价的方法学质量和证据质量。
分析纳入了8篇评价。AMSTAR-2评估结果显示,所有纳入评价的方法学质量极低。这些评价共纳入了36个结局指标。GRADE结果显示,25个(25/36,69.4%)结局提供了低质量或极低质量的证据,4个(4/36,11.1%)提供了中等质量的证据,7个(7/36,19.4%)提供了高质量的证据。描述性分析结果显示,针灸治疗TTH可降低头痛频率和严重程度。
针灸似乎是治疗TTH的一种有效治疗方式,但由于纳入的SRs/MAs的方法学质量和证据质量普遍较低,结果的可信度有限。