Suppr超能文献

甲基化的PTGER4作为IV期肺癌治疗反应评估标志物比CA125、CEA、Cyfra211和NSE更具优势。

Methylated PTGER4 is better than CA125, CEA, Cyfra211 and NSE as a therapeutic response assessment marker in stage IV lung cancer.

作者信息

Zhang Yunxia, Huang Jianfeng, Zou Qinzhou, Che Jun, Yang Kaihua, Fan Qiang, Qian Danqi, Wu Jia, Bao Erwen, Song Lele, Zhang Fuzheng

机构信息

Department of Radiotherapy, The Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University, Binhu, Wuxi, Jiangsu 214062, P.R. China.

Department of Radiotherapy, The Eighth Medical Center of The Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Haidian, Beijing 100091, P.R. China.

出版信息

Oncol Lett. 2020 Apr;19(4):3229-3238. doi: 10.3892/ol.2020.11434. Epub 2020 Mar 3.

Abstract

Real-time assessment of therapeutic response in patients with advanced lung cancer presents a major challenge throughout the treatment process. Currently, computed tomography imaging is often used; however, it is radiation-based and hysteretic and is not suitable for repeated use as a real-time assessment. Blood biomarkers represent a novel solution for assessing therapeutic response in patients with advanced lung cancer. In the present study, the efficacy of a methylation marker [methylated prostaglandin E receptor 4 (mPTGER4)] and four protein markers [carcinoma antigen 125 (CA125), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cytokeratin 19-fragments (cyfra21-1) and neuron-specific enolase (NSE)] were simultaneously evaluated to determine their potential in facilitating therapeutic response monitoring as well as their prognostic values in patients with stage IV lung cancer. The results indicated that, following treatment, the blood levels of methylated PTGER4 and NSE had significantly decreased, and mPRGER4, CA125, CEA and NSE exhibited a significant decrease in percentage level. Since mPTGER4 exhibited a higher rate of positive detection prior to therapy, and a greater response of sensitivity to therapy compared to the protein markers, it may represent an improved marker for the monitoring of therapeutic response. The efficacy of the markers in predicting the overall survival (OS) rate of patients with stage IV lung cancer was also assessed. Results from the follow-up of patients (up to 891 days) revealed that the blood levels of mPTGER4, CA125 and NSE before treatment were able to predict overall survival (OS) rate. Additionally, the percentage change in expression levels of CA125, CEA and NSE was also able to predict the OS rate. In conclusion, the present results indicate that mPTGER4 represents an improved biomarker for monitoring therapeutic efficacy compared with CA125, CEA, Cyfra21-1 and NSE. In predicting the long-term survival of patients with stage IV lung cancer; however, the pre-treatment levels of mPTGER4, CA125 and NSE and the percentage changes of CA125, CEA and NSE may be used as the markers.

摘要

在晚期肺癌患者的整个治疗过程中,对治疗反应进行实时评估是一项重大挑战。目前,计算机断层扫描成像经常被使用;然而,它基于辐射且具有滞后性,不适合作为实时评估进行重复使用。血液生物标志物是评估晚期肺癌患者治疗反应的一种新方法。在本研究中,同时评估了一种甲基化标志物[甲基化前列腺素E受体4(mPTGER4)]和四种蛋白质标志物[癌抗原125(CA125)、癌胚抗原(CEA)、细胞角蛋白19片段(cyfra21-1)和神经元特异性烯醇化酶(NSE)]的疗效,以确定它们在促进治疗反应监测方面的潜力以及它们在IV期肺癌患者中的预后价值。结果表明,治疗后,甲基化PTGER4和NSE的血液水平显著下降,mPRGER4、CA125、CEA和NSE的百分比水平显著降低。由于mPTGER4在治疗前表现出更高的阳性检测率,并且与蛋白质标志物相比对治疗的敏感性反应更大,它可能是一种用于监测治疗反应的改进标志物。还评估了这些标志物预测IV期肺癌患者总生存率(OS)的疗效。对患者长达891天的随访结果显示,治疗前mPTGER4、CA125和NSE的血液水平能够预测总生存率(OS)。此外,CA125、CEA和NSE表达水平的百分比变化也能够预测总生存率。总之,目前的结果表明,与CA125、CEA、Cyfra21-1和NSE相比,mPTGER4是一种用于监测治疗疗效的改进生物标志物。然而,在预测IV期肺癌患者的长期生存时,mPTGER4、CA125和NSE的治疗前水平以及CA125、CEA和NSE的百分比变化可作为标志物。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6fb/7074558/a2e412b77475/ol-19-04-3229-g00.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验