Suppr超能文献

电子液体中游离碱尼古丁测定的分析视角

An Analytical Perspective on Determination of Free Base Nicotine in E-Liquids.

作者信息

Gholap Vinit V, Heyder Rodrigo S, Kosmider Leon, Halquist Matthew S

机构信息

Department of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmacy, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond 23298, VA, USA.

Department of Pharmaceutics, Pharmaceutical Engineering, School of Pharmacy, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond 23298, VA, USA.

出版信息

J Anal Methods Chem. 2020 Mar 10;2020:6178570. doi: 10.1155/2020/6178570. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

In electronic cigarette users, nicotine delivery to lungs depends on various factors. One of the important factors is e-liquid nicotine concentration. Nicotine concentration in e-liquids ranges from 0 to >50 mg/mL. Furthermore, nicotine exists in protonated and unprotonated ("free base") forms. The two forms are believed to affect the nicotine absorption in body. Therefore, in addition to total nicotine concentration, e-liquids should be characterized for their free base nicotine yield. Two approaches are being used for the determination of free base nicotine in e-liquids. The first is applying a dilution to e-liquids followed by two methods: Henderson-Hasselbalch theory application or a Liquid-Liquid Extraction. The second is the without-dilution approach followed by H NMR method. Here, we carried out controlled experiments using five e-liquids of different flavors using these two approaches. In the dilution approach, the Henderson-Hasselbalch method was tested using potentiometric titration. The accuracy was found to be >98% for all five e-liquid samples ( = 3). A Liquid-Liquid Extraction was carried out using toluene or hexane as extraction solvent. The Liquid-Liquid Extraction technique was found to be limited by solvent interactions with flavors. Solvent extractions resulted in flavor dependent inaccuracies in free base nicotine determination (5 to 277% of calculated values). The without-dilution approach was carried out using H NMR as described by Duell et al. This approach is proposed to offer an independent and alternative scale. None of the methods have established a strong correlation between pre- and postvaporization free base nicotine yield. Here we present comparative results of two approaches using analytical techniques. Such a comparison would be helpful in establishing a standardized method for free base nicotine determination of e-liquids.

摘要

在电子烟使用者中,尼古丁向肺部的输送取决于多种因素。其中一个重要因素是电子烟液中的尼古丁浓度。电子烟液中的尼古丁浓度范围为0至>50毫克/毫升。此外,尼古丁以质子化和非质子化(“游离碱”)形式存在。据信这两种形式会影响人体对尼古丁的吸收。因此,除了总尼古丁浓度外,电子烟液还应以其游离碱尼古丁产率来表征。目前有两种方法用于测定电子烟液中的游离碱尼古丁。第一种方法是对电子烟液进行稀释,然后采用两种方法:应用亨德森 - 哈塞尔巴尔赫理论或液 - 液萃取。第二种方法是不稀释法,随后采用核磁共振氢谱法。在此,我们使用这两种方法对五种不同口味的电子烟液进行了对照实验。在稀释法中,使用电位滴定法测试了亨德森 - 哈塞尔巴尔赫方法。发现所有五个电子烟液样品(n = 3)的准确度均>98%。使用甲苯或己烷作为萃取溶剂进行液 - 液萃取。发现液 - 液萃取技术受溶剂与口味相互作用的限制。溶剂萃取导致游离碱尼古丁测定中存在与口味相关的数据不准确情况(为计算值的5%至277%)。按照杜埃尔等人所述,使用核磁共振氢谱法进行不稀释法实验。该方法被认为提供了一种独立的替代标准。目前尚无方法在蒸发前后的游离碱尼古丁产率之间建立强相关性。在此我们展示使用分析技术对两种方法的比较结果。这样的比较将有助于建立一种标准化的电子烟液游离碱尼古丁测定方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49f1/7085884/fc4109a63a61/JAMC2020-6178570.001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验