Wang William L, Ilyas Asif M
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University and the Rothman Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
J Wrist Surg. 2020 Apr;9(2):177-184. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1694063. Epub 2019 Aug 8.
External fixation and dorsal bridge plating are wrist spanning fixation options for distal radius fractures; however, their comparative effectiveness is not well understood. A meta-analysis was conducted to compare the clinical outcomes between these two techniques. A PubMed database query of all distal radius fracture cases managed with spanning external fixation or dorsal bridge plating was performed. A total of 28 articles met inclusion criteria, yielding 895 patients for data extraction and comparative analysis. Dorsal bridge plating demonstrated lower rates of infection (2 vs. 10%, = 0.05) and complex regional pain syndrome (1 vs. 4%, = 0.04) but higher rates of hardware failure (4 vs. 1%, = 0.026). Bridge plating also demonstrated higher rates of excellent/good ratings under the Gartland and Werley outcome score (91 vs. 83%, = 0.016). There was no significant difference in DASH (Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Wrist) scores, radiographic parameters, or unplanned reoperations between the two spanning fixation options. Bridge plating and external fixation both appear to be comparable for spanning fixation constructs for distal radius fractures, but with bridge plating having a potentially lower complication profile.
外固定和背侧桥式钢板固定是桡骨远端骨折的腕部跨越固定选择;然而,它们的相对有效性尚未得到充分了解。进行了一项荟萃分析以比较这两种技术的临床结果。
对所有采用跨越外固定或背侧桥式钢板固定治疗的桡骨远端骨折病例进行了PubMed数据库查询。共有28篇文章符合纳入标准,产生了895例患者用于数据提取和比较分析。
背侧桥式钢板固定的感染率(2%对10%,P = 0.05)和复杂性区域疼痛综合征发生率(1%对4%,P = 0.04)较低,但内固定失败率较高(4%对1%,P = 0.026)。在Gartland和Werley结果评分中,桥式钢板固定的优良率也较高(91%对83%,P = 0.016)。两种跨越固定方式在DASH(上肢、肩部和腕部功能障碍)评分(上肢、肩部和腕部功能障碍)、影像学参数或计划外再次手术方面没有显著差异。
对于桡骨远端骨折的跨越固定结构,桥式钢板固定和外固定似乎相当,但桥式钢板固定的并发症可能较少。