Filipovic Aleksandra, Miller George, Bolen Joseph
PureTech Health PLC, Boston, MA, United States.
New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States.
Front Cell Dev Biol. 2020 Mar 17;8:155. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2020.00155. eCollection 2020.
Clinical value and utility of checkpoint inhibitors, a drug class targeting adaptive immune suppression pathways (PD-1, PDL-1, and CTLA-4), is growing rapidly and maintains status of a landmark achievement in oncology. Their efficacy has transformed life expectancy in multiple deadly cancer types (melanoma, lung cancer, renal/urothelial carcinoma, certain colorectal cancers, lymphomas, etc.). Despite significant clinical development efforts, therapeutic indication of approved checkpoint inhibitors are not as wide as the oncology community and patients would like them to be, potentially bringing into question their universal efficacy across tumor histologies. With the main goal of expanding immunotherapy applications, identifying of biomarkers to accurately predict therapeutic response and treatment related side-effects are a paramount need in the field. Specificities surrounding checkpoint inhibitors in clinic, such as unexpected tumor response patterns (pseudo- and hyper-progression), late responders, as well as specific immune mediated toxicities, complicate the management of patients. They stem from the complexities and dynamics of the tumor/host immune interactions, as well as baseline tumor biology. Search for clinically effective biomarkers therefore calls for a holistic approach, rather than implementation of a single analyte. The goal is to achieve dynamic and comprehensive acquisition, analyses and interpretation of immunological and biologic information about the tumor and the immune system, and to compute these parameters into an actionable, maximally predictive value at the individual patient level. Limitation delaying swift incorporation of validated immuno-oncology biomarkers span from standardized biospecimens acquisition and processing, selection of proficient biomarker discovery and validation methods, to establishing multidisciplinary consortiums and data sharing platforms. Multi-disciplinary efforts have already yielded some approved (PDL-1 and MSI-status) and other advanced tests (TMB, neoantigen pattern, and TIL infiltration rate). Importantly, clinical trial taskforces now recognize the imperative of the biomarker-driven trial design and execution, to enable translating biomarker discoveries into the clinical setting. This will ensure we utilize the "conspiracy" between the peripheral and intra-tumoral dynamic markers in shaping responses to checkpoint blockade, for the ultimate patient benefit.
检查点抑制剂是一类针对适应性免疫抑制途径(PD-1、PDL-1和CTLA-4)的药物,其临床价值和效用正在迅速增长,并保持着肿瘤学领域里程碑式成就的地位。它们的疗效已经改变了多种致命癌症类型(黑色素瘤、肺癌、肾/尿路上皮癌、某些结直肠癌、淋巴瘤等)患者的预期寿命。尽管在临床开发方面付出了巨大努力,但已获批的检查点抑制剂的治疗适应症并不像肿瘤学界和患者期望的那样广泛,这可能使人们对其在所有肿瘤组织学类型中的普遍疗效产生质疑。为了扩大免疫疗法的应用范围,识别能够准确预测治疗反应和治疗相关副作用的生物标志物是该领域的首要需求。检查点抑制剂在临床中存在一些特殊情况,如意外的肿瘤反应模式(假性进展和超进展)、延迟反应者以及特定的免疫介导毒性,这些都使患者的管理变得复杂。它们源于肿瘤/宿主免疫相互作用的复杂性和动态性,以及基线肿瘤生物学特性。因此,寻找临床有效的生物标志物需要一种整体方法,而不是采用单一分析物。目标是实现对肿瘤和免疫系统的免疫学和生物学信息进行动态、全面的获取、分析和解释,并将这些参数转化为个体患者水平上具有可操作性、最大预测价值的信息。阻碍经过验证的免疫肿瘤学生物标志物迅速应用的限制因素包括标准化生物样本的采集和处理、选择熟练的生物标志物发现和验证方法,以及建立多学科联盟和数据共享平台。多学科努力已经产生了一些获批的(PDL-1和微卫星不稳定性状态)和其他先进的检测方法(肿瘤突变负荷、新抗原模式和肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞浸润率)。重要的是,临床试验工作组现在认识到生物标志物驱动的试验设计和执行的必要性,以便能够将生物标志物的发现转化到临床实践中。这将确保我们利用外周和肿瘤内动态标志物之间的“协同作用”来塑造对检查点阻断的反应,最终使患者受益。