• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项关于信息、纳税人偏好以及税负感知充足性的调查实验。

A survey experiment on information, taxpayer preferences, and perceived adequacy of the tax burden.

作者信息

Abbiati Lorenzo, Antinyan Armenak, Corazzini Luca

机构信息

Department of Economics, University of Insubria, via Monte Generoso,71, Varese 21100, Italy.

Wenlan School of Business, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, Nanhu Avenue 182, 430073, Wuhan, PR China.

出版信息

Heliyon. 2020 Mar 25;6(3):e03576. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03576. eCollection 2020 Mar.

DOI:10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03576
PMID:32258457
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7103778/
Abstract

We report results of a survey experiment aimed at testing whether eliciting taxpayer preferences on how to allocate the collected taxes over national public goods as well as providing information about the composition of the public expenditure influence the tax rate that taxpayers consider adequate to pay. We find that information exerts no effects on the level of the adequate tax rate. However, taxpayers are willing to accept a higher tax burden when they express their preferences on how to use tax revenues to finance public goods and services.

摘要

我们报告了一项调查实验的结果,该实验旨在测试,在如何将征收的税款分配用于国家公共产品方面引发纳税人的偏好,以及提供有关公共支出构成的信息,是否会影响纳税人认为合适的税率。我们发现,信息对合适税率的水平没有影响。然而,当纳税人就如何使用税收收入为公共产品和服务提供资金表达他们的偏好时,他们愿意接受更高的税负。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/60e8/7103778/1226c0fac957/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/60e8/7103778/a263d73934d2/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/60e8/7103778/1226c0fac957/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/60e8/7103778/a263d73934d2/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/60e8/7103778/1226c0fac957/gr2.jpg

相似文献

1
A survey experiment on information, taxpayer preferences, and perceived adequacy of the tax burden.一项关于信息、纳税人偏好以及税负感知充足性的调查实验。
Heliyon. 2020 Mar 25;6(3):e03576. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03576. eCollection 2020 Mar.
2
Who Would Pay Higher Taxes for Better Mental Health? Results of a Large-Sample National Choice Experiment.谁愿意为改善心理健康支付更高的税款?一项大规模全国选择实验的结果。
Milbank Q. 2021 Sep;99(3):771-793. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12523. Epub 2021 Aug 10.
3
Motor vehicle safety, health care, and taxes. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation.机动车安全、医疗保健与税收。美国运输部国家公路交通安全管理局。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 1994 Jan-Mar;9(1):11-23.
4
Failure to CAPTCHA Attention: Null Results from an Honesty Priming Experiment in Guatemala.未能引起验证码注意:危地马拉一项诚实启动实验的零结果。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2017 Apr 28;7(2):28. doi: 10.3390/bs7020028.
5
Do taxpayers consider quality labels as a form of recommendation for good tax-preparation services? Evidence from Germany.纳税人是否将质量标签视为优质税务申报服务的一种推荐形式?来自德国的证据。
Heliyon. 2023 Dec 19;10(1):e23357. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23357. eCollection 2024 Jan 15.
6
Regulatory fit effects on perceived fiscal exchange and tax compliance.监管匹配对感知到的财政交换和税收遵从的影响。
J Socio Econ. 2010 Apr 1;39(2):271-277. doi: 10.1016/j.socec.2009.12.003.
7
Tax Talk: An Exploration of Online Discussions Among Taxpayers.税务话题:纳税人在线讨论探究
J Bus Ethics. 2018;149(4):931-944. doi: 10.1007/s10551-016-3032-y. Epub 2016 Feb 19.
8
Public support for tax policies in COVID-19 times: evidence from Luxembourg.新冠疫情时期公众对税收政策的支持:来自卢森堡的证据
Int Tax Public Financ. 2022;29(6):1395-1418. doi: 10.1007/s10797-022-09744-y. Epub 2022 Jul 25.
9
Deterrence or conformity?-An analysis of digital economy taxpayer compliance behavior based on prospect theory.威慑还是遵从?——基于前景理论的数字经济纳税人遵从行为分析
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 21;13:967715. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.967715. eCollection 2022.
10
"Willing to Pay?" Tax Compliance in Britain and Italy: An Experimental Analysis.“支付意愿?”英国和意大利的税收合规情况:一项实验分析。
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 26;11(2):e0150277. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150277. eCollection 2016.

本文引用的文献

1
Building a Better America-One Wealth Quintile at a Time.建设更美好的美国——一次一个财富五分位数。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2011 Jan;6(1):9-12. doi: 10.1177/1745691610393524. Epub 2011 Feb 3.
2
Validating vignette and conjoint survey experiments against real-world behavior.对照现实世界行为验证案例和联合调查实验。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Feb 24;112(8):2395-400. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1416587112. Epub 2015 Feb 2.
3
The demand for health insurance among uninsured Americans: results of a survey experiment and implications for policy.
美国无保险人群对健康保险的需求:一项调查实验的结果及其对政策的启示。
J Health Econ. 2013 Sep;32(5):780-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2012.09.005. Epub 2013 Feb 26.
4
Unpacking, repacking, and anchoring: advances in support theory.剖析、重新包装与锚定:支持理论的进展
Psychol Rev. 1997 Apr;104(2):406-15. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.104.2.406.