• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

纳税人是否将质量标签视为优质税务申报服务的一种推荐形式?来自德国的证据。

Do taxpayers consider quality labels as a form of recommendation for good tax-preparation services? Evidence from Germany.

作者信息

Wichmann Johannes, Leyer Michael, Altmüller Isabell

机构信息

Philipps-University of Marburg Barfüßertor 2, 35037 Marburg, Germany.

Queensland University of Technology 2 George St, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia.

出版信息

Heliyon. 2023 Dec 19;10(1):e23357. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23357. eCollection 2024 Jan 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23357
PMID:38205331
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10776938/
Abstract

Quality labels are important measures for reducing the information asymmetry between principals and agents to enhance trust. However, little research is available on the effects of quality labels used in tax-preparation services from critical perspectives in accounting. The present research contributes to the field by addressing the underlying reasons for German taxpayers to consider quality labels for identifying good tax-preparation services. These contributions are based on a survey of 199 taxpayers in Germany. The results show that the intention to consider quality labels is mainly driven by taxpayers' attitude and trust in quality labels, perceived norms having some influence, and perceived behavioral control having no influence. Hence, we highlight that the reasoned action approach is appropriate for this study, and aim to identify the relevant factors that influence taxpayers' intention to consider quality labels. The results contribute to a general understanding of the importance of quality labels for tax-preparation services in the context of accounting, organizations, and society. Both academia and practitioners can utilize these insights for further research and consultation on quality labels and tax-preparation services.

摘要

质量标签是减少委托人与代理人之间信息不对称以增强信任的重要措施。然而,从会计的关键视角来看,关于税务申报服务中使用的质量标签的影响,现有研究甚少。本研究通过探讨德国纳税人考虑使用质量标签来识别优质税务申报服务的潜在原因,为该领域做出了贡献。这些贡献基于对199名德国纳税人的调查。结果表明,考虑质量标签的意愿主要受纳税人对质量标签的态度和信任驱动,感知规范有一定影响,而感知行为控制没有影响。因此,我们强调理性行动方法适用于本研究,并旨在识别影响纳税人考虑质量标签意愿的相关因素。研究结果有助于在会计、组织和社会背景下,全面理解质量标签对税务申报服务的重要性。学术界和从业者均可利用这些见解,进一步研究质量标签和税务申报服务,并进行相关咨询。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4d3/10776938/499968336b39/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4d3/10776938/aa5de0a6ca79/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4d3/10776938/499968336b39/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4d3/10776938/aa5de0a6ca79/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4d3/10776938/499968336b39/gr2.jpg

相似文献

1
Do taxpayers consider quality labels as a form of recommendation for good tax-preparation services? Evidence from Germany.纳税人是否将质量标签视为优质税务申报服务的一种推荐形式?来自德国的证据。
Heliyon. 2023 Dec 19;10(1):e23357. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23357. eCollection 2024 Jan 15.
2
An empirical study on the impact of quality antecedents on tax payers' acceptance of Internet tax-filing systems.质量先行因素对纳税人接受互联网纳税申报系统影响的实证研究。
Gov Inf Q. 2005;22(3):389-410. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2005.05.002. Epub 2005 Jul 14.
3
Regulatory fit effects on perceived fiscal exchange and tax compliance.监管匹配对感知到的财政交换和税收遵从的影响。
J Socio Econ. 2010 Apr 1;39(2):271-277. doi: 10.1016/j.socec.2009.12.003.
4
Tax Talk: An Exploration of Online Discussions Among Taxpayers.税务话题:纳税人在线讨论探究
J Bus Ethics. 2018;149(4):931-944. doi: 10.1007/s10551-016-3032-y. Epub 2016 Feb 19.
5
The impact of powerful authorities and trustful taxpayers: evidence for the extended slippery slope framework from Austria, Finland, and Hungary.权威机构与信任纳税人的影响:来自奥地利、芬兰和匈牙利的扩展滑坡框架证据。
Policy Stud. 2019 Feb 11;41(1):98-111. doi: 10.1080/01442872.2019.1577375. eCollection 2020.
6
A survey experiment on information, taxpayer preferences, and perceived adequacy of the tax burden.一项关于信息、纳税人偏好以及税负感知充足性的调查实验。
Heliyon. 2020 Mar 25;6(3):e03576. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03576. eCollection 2020 Mar.
7
Tax evasion, psychological egoism, and revenue collection performance: Evidence from Amhara region, Ethiopia.逃税、心理利己主义与税收征管绩效:来自埃塞俄比亚阿姆哈拉地区的证据。
Front Psychol. 2023 Feb 8;14:1045537. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1045537. eCollection 2023.
8
Do healthcare tax credits help poor-health individuals on low incomes?医疗保健税收抵免是否有助于低收入贫困人群改善健康状况?
Eur J Health Econ. 2018 Mar;19(2):293-307. doi: 10.1007/s10198-017-0884-8. Epub 2017 Mar 15.
9
The Relationship Between Austrian Tax Auditors and Self-Employed Taxpayers: Evidence From a Qualitative Study.奥地利税务审计员与个体经营纳税人之间的关系:来自定性研究的证据
Front Psychol. 2019 May 13;10:1034. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01034. eCollection 2019.
10
Public policies and tax evasion: evidence from SAARC countries.公共政策与逃税:来自南盟国家的证据。
Heliyon. 2020 Nov 11;6(11):e05449. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05449. eCollection 2020 Nov.

本文引用的文献

1
The Theory of Planned Behavior: Selected Recent Advances and Applications.计划行为理论:近期精选进展与应用
Eur J Psychol. 2020 Aug 31;16(3):352-356. doi: 10.5964/ejop.v16i3.3107. eCollection 2020 Aug.
2
Efficacy of the Theory of Planned Behaviour: a meta-analytic review.计划行为理论的有效性:一项元分析综述。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2001 Dec;40(Pt 4):471-99. doi: 10.1348/014466601164939.