Miraglia Dennis, Miguel Lourdes A, Alonso Wilfredo
Department of Internal Medicine, Good Samaritan Hospital, Aguadilla, PR, United States.
Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2020 Feb 25;8(1):e15. eCollection 2020.
Few studies have described their experience using esmolol, an ultra-short acting β-adrenergic antagonist, in the emergency department (ED) as a feasible adjuvant therapy for the treatment of refractory ventricular fibrillation/pulseless ventricular tachycardia (VF/pVT) out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. However, there is currently insufficient evidence to support the widespread implementation of this therapy. The aim of this scoping review was to summarize the current available evidence on the use of esmolol as an adjuvant therapy for refractory VF/pVT out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, as well as to identify gaps within the literature that may require further research.
We conducted a comprehensive literature search of MEDLINE via PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) on July 5, 2019. The search was restricted to articles that were published from January 2000 to July 2019. Google Scholar was searched and reference lists of relevant papers were examined to identify additional studies. We included any controlled clinical study design (randomized controlled trials and non-randomized controlled trials) and observational studies (cohort studies and case-control studies) in adults providing information on the use of esmolol as an adjuvant therapy for refractory VF/pVT out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
The search yielded 2817 unique records, out of which 2 peer-reviewed articles were found relating to the research purpose totaling 66 patients 33.3% (n = 22) of which received esmolol. These studies found that sustained return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) was significantly more common in the patients that received esmolol compared to the control group. However, no statistically significant outcomes were found regarding survival to discharge and favorable neurological outcome. No randomized controlled trials were identified.
To date, it is difficult to conclude the real benefit of esmolol as an adjuvant therapy for refractory VF/pVT out-of-hospital cardiac arrest based on the available evidence. The findings of this scoping review suggest that there is a paucity of research and limited evidence to support this therapy.
很少有研究描述其在急诊科使用艾司洛尔(一种超短效β-肾上腺素能拮抗剂)作为院外心脏骤停难治性室颤/无脉性室性心动过速(VF/pVT)治疗的可行辅助疗法的经验。然而,目前尚无足够证据支持广泛应用该疗法。本综述的目的是总结目前关于艾司洛尔作为院外心脏骤停难治性VF/pVT辅助疗法的现有证据,并确定文献中可能需要进一步研究的空白。
2019年7月5日,我们通过PubMed、Embase、Scopus和Cochrane对照试验中央注册库(CENTRAL)对MEDLINE进行了全面的文献检索。检索限于2000年1月至2019年7月发表的文章。检索了谷歌学术,并查阅了相关论文的参考文献列表以识别其他研究。我们纳入了任何对照临床研究设计(随机对照试验和非随机对照试验)以及观察性研究(队列研究和病例对照研究),这些研究针对成人提供了关于使用艾司洛尔作为院外心脏骤停难治性VF/pVT辅助疗法的信息。
检索产生了2817条独特记录,其中发现2篇经过同行评审的文章与研究目的相关,共66例患者,其中33.3%(n = 22)接受了艾司洛尔治疗。这些研究发现,与对照组相比,接受艾司洛尔治疗的患者中持续自主循环恢复(ROSC)更为常见。然而,在出院生存率和良好神经功能结局方面未发现具有统计学意义的结果。未识别到随机对照试验。
迄今为止,基于现有证据很难得出艾司洛尔作为院外心脏骤停难治性VF/pVT辅助疗法的真正益处。本综述的结果表明,支持该疗法的研究匮乏且证据有限。