• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用合成肩章治疗巨大肩袖撕裂 - 一项可行性研究。

The use of a synthetic shoulder patch for large and massive rotator cuff tears - a feasibility study.

机构信息

Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Chapel Allerton Hospital, Chapeltown Road, Leeds, LS7 4SA, UK.

NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds, UK.

出版信息

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 Apr 7;21(1):213. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03227-z.

DOI:10.1186/s12891-020-03227-z
PMID:32264949
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7140555/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to explore the feasibility of using a non-absorbable biocompatible polyester patch to augment open repair of massive rotator cuff tears (Patch group) and compare outcomes with other treatment options (Non-patch group).

METHODS

Participants referred to orthopaedic clinics for rotator cuff surgery were recruited. Choice of intervention (Patch or Non-patch) was based on patient preference and intra-operative findings. Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), and Constant score were completed at baseline and 6 months. Shoulder MRI was performed at baseline and 6 months to assess fat fraction and Goutallier classification pre- and post- treatment. Feasibility outcomes (including retention, consent and missing data) were assessed.

RESULTS

Sixty-eight participants (29 in the Patch group, 39 in Non-patch group) were included (mean age 65.3 years). Conversion to consent (92.6%), missing data (0% at baseline), and attrition rate (16%) were deemed successful feasibility endpoints. There was significant improvement in the Patch group compared to Non-patch at 6 months in OSS (difference in medians 9.76 (95% CI 2.25, 17.29) and SPADI: 22.97 (95% CI 3.02, 42.92), with no substantive differences in Constant score. The patch group had a higher proportion of participants improving greater than MCID for OSS (78% vs 62%) and SPADI (63% vs 50%) respectively. Analysis of the 48 paired MRIs demonstrated a slight increase in the fat fraction for supraspinatus (53 to 55%), and infraspinatus (26 to 29%) at 6 months. These differences were similar and in the same direction when the participants were analysed by treatment group. The Goutallier score remained the same or worsened one grade in both groups equally.

CONCLUSIONS

This study indicates that a definitive clinical trial investigating the use of a non-absorbable patch to augment repair of massive rotator cuff tears is feasible. In such patients, the patch has the potential to improve shoulder symptoms at 6 months.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ISRCTN, ISRCTN79844053, Registered 15th October 2014 (retrospectively registered).

摘要

背景

本研究旨在探讨使用不可吸收的生物相容性聚酯补片增强开放性巨大肩袖撕裂修复的可行性,并与其他治疗选择(非补片组)进行比较。

方法

招募因肩袖手术而到骨科诊所就诊的参与者。干预措施的选择(补片或非补片)基于患者的偏好和术中发现。基线和 6 个月时完成牛津肩评分(OSS)、肩痛和残疾指数(SPADI)和 Constant 评分。基线和 6 个月时进行肩部 MRI 检查,以评估治疗前后的脂肪分数和 Goutallier 分级。评估可行性结果(包括保留率、同意率和缺失数据)。

结果

纳入 68 名参与者(补片组 29 名,非补片组 39 名;平均年龄 65.3 岁)。转换为同意率(92.6%)、缺失数据率(基线时为 0%)和流失率(16%)被认为是成功的可行性终点。与非补片组相比,补片组在 6 个月时 OSS 显著改善(中位数差值 9.76(95%CI 2.25,17.29)和 SPADI:22.97(95%CI 3.02,42.92),Constant 评分无实质性差异。补片组有更高比例的参与者在 OSS(78%比 62%)和 SPADI(63%比 50%)方面改善大于 MCID。对 48 对 MRI 的分析表明,冈上肌(53%至 55%)和冈下肌(26%至 29%)的脂肪分数在 6 个月时略有增加。这些差异在按治疗组分析时相似且方向相同。两组的 Goutallier 评分保持不变或恶化一级。

结论

本研究表明,使用不可吸收补片增强修复巨大肩袖撕裂的确定性临床试验是可行的。在这些患者中,补片有潜力在 6 个月时改善肩部症状。

试验注册

ISRCTN,ISRCTN79844053,2014 年 10 月 15 日注册(回顾性注册)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c11e/7140555/38ec35a76f73/12891_2020_3227_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c11e/7140555/a67f7b8687da/12891_2020_3227_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c11e/7140555/29f5f7b0e895/12891_2020_3227_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c11e/7140555/38ec35a76f73/12891_2020_3227_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c11e/7140555/a67f7b8687da/12891_2020_3227_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c11e/7140555/29f5f7b0e895/12891_2020_3227_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c11e/7140555/38ec35a76f73/12891_2020_3227_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The use of a synthetic shoulder patch for large and massive rotator cuff tears - a feasibility study.使用合成肩章治疗巨大肩袖撕裂 - 一项可行性研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 Apr 7;21(1):213. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03227-z.
2
Functional and Radiologic Outcomes of Degenerative Versus Traumatic Full-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears Involving the Supraspinatus Tendon.变性与创伤性全层肩袖撕裂累及冈上肌腱的功能和放射学结果。
Am J Sports Med. 2024 Feb;52(2):441-450. doi: 10.1177/03635465231219253. Epub 2024 Jan 23.
3
Evaluating the Outcomes of Rotator Cuff Repairs With Polytetrafluoroethylene Patches for Massive and Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears With a Minimum 2-Year Follow-up.评估聚四氟乙烯补片修复巨大不可修复肩袖撕裂的疗效:至少 2 年随访。
Am J Sports Med. 2018 Nov;46(13):3155-3164. doi: 10.1177/0363546518801014. Epub 2018 Oct 11.
4
Comparative Effectiveness of Operative Versus Nonoperative Treatment for Rotator Cuff Tears: A Propensity Score Analysis From the ROW Cohort.手术与非手术治疗肩袖撕裂的疗效比较:来自 ROW 队列的倾向评分分析。
Am J Sports Med. 2019 Nov;47(13):3065-3072. doi: 10.1177/0363546519873840. Epub 2019 Sep 13.
5
[Clinical and radiologic outcomes after tendon insertion medialized repair of large-to-massive rotator cuff tears].[大型至巨大肩袖撕裂肌腱止点内移修复后的临床和影像学结果]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2023 Apr 15;37(4):391-397. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202212019.
6
Massive rotator cuff tears with short tendon length can be successfully repaired using synthetic patch augmentation.巨大的肩袖撕裂伴短肌腱长度可以使用合成补片增强来成功修复。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2023 Oct;32(10):2089-2096. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.03.037. Epub 2023 May 12.
7
The use of a patch to augment rotator cuff surgery - A survey of UK shoulder and elbow surgeons.使用补片增强肩袖修补术-英国肩肘外科医生的调查。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 2;15(4):e0230235. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230235. eCollection 2020.
8
Surgery for rotator cuff tears.肩袖撕裂的手术治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Dec 9;12(12):CD013502. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013502.
9
Comparative Time to Improvement in Nonoperative and Operative Treatment of Rotator Cuff Tears.比较肩袖撕裂的非手术治疗和手术治疗的改善时间。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2020 Jul 1;102(13):1142-1150. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.19.01112.
10
Arthroscopic versus Mini-Open Rotator Cuff Repair: Should We Ignore the Mini-Open Surgery?关节镜与小切口开放肩袖修复术:我们是否应该忽视小切口手术?
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2021;88(5):369-374.

引用本文的文献

1
A meta-analysis of the outcomes of large to massive rotator cuff tears treated with direct repair, graft augmentation, or superior capsular reconstruction.一项关于采用直接修复、移植物增强或关节囊上重建治疗大型至巨大型肩袖撕裂结局的荟萃分析。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2025 Aug 20;35(1):354. doi: 10.1007/s00590-025-04488-x.
2
Commercial Biomaterial-Based Products for Tendon Surgical Augmentation: A Scoping Review on Currently Available Medical Devices.用于肌腱手术增强的商业化生物材料基产品:对现有医疗器械的范围综述
J Funct Biomater. 2025 Apr 3;16(4):130. doi: 10.3390/jfb16040130.
3
BicepBrace biceps tendon augmentation improves outcomes one year following surgery.

本文引用的文献

1
Foreign Body Reaction Associated With Artificial LARS Ligaments: A Retrieval Study.人工LARS韧带相关的异物反应:一项取出研究。
Orthop J Sports Med. 2018 Dec 4;6(12):2325967118811604. doi: 10.1177/2325967118811604. eCollection 2018 Dec.
2
Operative versus nonoperative treatment for the management of full-thickness rotator cuff tears: a systematic review and meta-analysis.手术与非手术治疗全层肩袖撕裂的疗效比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018 Mar;27(3):572-576. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2017.09.032. Epub 2017 Nov 21.
3
Shoulder-specific outcomes 1 year after nontraumatic full-thickness rotator cuff repair: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.
二头肌支撑肌腱增强术可改善术后一年的治疗效果。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2025 Apr 15;35(1):159. doi: 10.1007/s00590-025-04285-6.
4
New Three Dimensional-Printed Polyethylene Terephthalate Glycol Liners for Hip Joint Endoprostheses: A Bioactive Platform for Bone Regeneration.用于髋关节假体的新型三维打印聚对苯二甲酸乙二醇酯衬垫:骨再生的生物活性平台
Materials (Basel). 2025 Mar 8;18(6):1206. doi: 10.3390/ma18061206.
5
The Clinical Application of Gel-Based Composite Scaffolds in Rotator Cuff Repair.基于凝胶的复合支架在肩袖修复中的临床应用
Gels. 2024 Dec 24;11(1):2. doi: 10.3390/gels11010002.
6
Patient-reported outcome tools and baseline scores vary by country and region for arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tears: a systematic review.针对巨大肩袖撕裂关节镜修复,患者报告结局工具和基线评分因国家和地区而异:一项系统评价。
JSES Rev Rep Tech. 2023 Jun 10;3(3):312-317. doi: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2023.05.008. eCollection 2023 Aug.
7
Patch augmentation does not provide better clinical outcomes than arthroscopic rotator cuff repair for large to massive rotator cuff tears.肩袖巨大或巨大撕裂患者,修补术并不比关节镜下肩袖修复术提供更好的临床效果。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022 Nov;30(11):3851-3861. doi: 10.1007/s00167-022-06975-8. Epub 2022 May 6.
8
Use of Gracile and semi-tendinosus tendons (GRAST) for the reconstruction of irreparable rotator cuff tears.使用 Gracile 和半腱肌腱(GRAST)重建不可修复的肩袖撕裂。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Apr 5;22(1):331. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04197-6.
非创伤性全层肩袖修复术后1年的肩部特异性结果:一项系统文献综述和荟萃分析。
Shoulder Elbow. 2017 Oct;9(4):247-257. doi: 10.1177/1758573217711903. Epub 2017 Jun 5.
4
Creation of a core outcome set for clinical trials of people with shoulder pain: a study protocol.创建肩痛患者临床试验的核心结局集:一项研究方案。
Trials. 2017 Jul 20;18(1):336. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2054-9.
5
Identifying a core set of outcome domains to measure in clinical trials for shoulder disorders: a modified Delphi study.确定肩部疾病临床试验中要测量的核心结局领域集:一项改良的德尔菲研究。
RMD Open. 2016 Dec 21;2(2):e000380. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2016-000380. eCollection 2016.
6
Effectiveness of open and arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (UKUFF): a randomised controlled trial.开放性与关节镜下肩袖修补术的有效性(UKUFF):一项随机对照试验。
Bone Joint J. 2017 Jan;99-B(1):107-115. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B1.BJJ-2016-0424.R1.
7
The biodegradable spacer as a novel treatment modality for massive rotator cuff tears: a prospective study with 5-year follow-up.可生物降解间隔物作为治疗巨大肩袖撕裂的一种新的治疗方式:一项为期5年随访的前瞻性研究。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2017 Jan;137(1):95-103. doi: 10.1007/s00402-016-2603-9. Epub 2016 Dec 12.
8
No prosthetic management of massive and irreparable rotator cuff tears.对于巨大且无法修复的肩袖撕裂,不进行假体治疗。
Shoulder Elbow. 2014 Jul;6(3):147-55. doi: 10.1177/1758573214535369. Epub 2014 Jun 17.
9
Research priorities for shoulder surgery: results of the 2015 James Lind Alliance patient and clinician priority setting partnership.肩部手术的研究重点:2015年詹姆斯·林德联盟患者与临床医生优先事项设定合作项目的结果
BMJ Open. 2016 Apr 11;6(4):e010412. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010412.
10
Outcomes of Combined Bone Marrow Stimulation and Patch Augmentation for Massive Rotator Cuff Tears.联合骨髓刺激和补片增强治疗巨大肩袖撕裂的疗效
Am J Sports Med. 2016 Apr;44(4):963-71. doi: 10.1177/0363546515625044. Epub 2016 Feb 5.