Giang D W, Perlin S J, Monajati A, Kido D J, Hollander J
Department of Neurology, University of Rochester, School of Medicine & Dentistry, New York.
Neuroradiology. 1988;30(6):518-23. doi: 10.1007/BF00339693.
We evaluated six patients with vertebrobasilar dolichoectasia (VBD) comparing clinical presentation with magnetic resonance (MR) and computed tomography (CT) imaging. MR diagnosed the condition as well as CT in all cases, but proved superior to CT in delineating the anatomical relationship of the vessels to the neural structures. MR proved especially useful in cases of VBD-associated hydrocephalus and posterior fossa masses. A coexisting tumor was diagnosed by MR in one case.
我们评估了6例椎基底动脉延长扩张症(VBD)患者,比较了临床表现与磁共振成像(MR)及计算机断层扫描(CT)影像。在所有病例中,MR和CT均能诊断出该疾病,但在描绘血管与神经结构的解剖关系方面,MR优于CT。MR在VBD相关脑积水和后颅窝肿块病例中尤其有用。1例患者经MR诊断出存在共存肿瘤。