Central Laboratory, Emek Medical Center, Afula.
Institute for Gastroenterology, Nutrition and Liver Disease, Schneider Children's Medical Center, Pitach-Tikva.
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2020 Jul;71(1):64-70. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000002711.
The European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition (ESPGHAN) 2012 guidelines, enabled for the first time, a nonbiopsy approach in the diagnosis of celiac disease (CD). We aimed to prospectively assess 4 tissue-transglutaminase (tTg) IgA assays of 4 random-access analyzers and examine their accuracy in diagnosing CD without a biopsy.
We enrolled 186 consecutive children referred to upper endoscopy and intestinal biopsy. One group included 109 patients with positive tTg that was referred for suspected CD. Another group included 77 patients with negative tTg referred because of other indications. All participants had a blood sample taken at the time of endoscopy. Samples were tested with 4 tTg IgA assays on automated analyzers and 1 Elisa kit. All intestinal biopsies were evaluated by a local pathologist, a central pathologist, and a CD expert blinded to each other. CD was diagnosed when full agreement was reached. Analytical performance of the assays included precision with controls and samples, lot to lot variation, and carryover.
In our cohort, all tested tTg IgA-automated assays showed sensitivities above 98% and specificities above 99%. ROC analysis demonstrated AUC (area under the curve) >0.99 for all 4 analyzers. The positive-predictive values (PPV) were all >0.99 and negative-predictive values (NPV) were >0.97. The Elisa kit had sensitivity of 95%, specificity of 96%, AUC of 0.96, PPV of 0.98 and NPV of 0.93.
CD can be accurately diagnosed without biopsy based on tTg IgA levels at least 10 times the ULN using the 4 high-volume random-access analyzers used in our study.
欧洲儿科胃肠病学、肝病学和营养学会(ESPGHAN)2012 年指南首次允许在诊断乳糜泻(CD)时采用非活检方法。我们旨在前瞻性评估 4 种随机接入分析仪上的 4 种组织转谷氨酰胺酶(tTg)IgA 检测,检查它们在不进行活检的情况下诊断 CD 的准确性。
我们招募了 186 例连续就诊于上消化道内镜和肠道活检的儿童。一组包括 109 例 tTg 阳性的患者,他们因疑似 CD 而被转介。另一组包括 77 例 tTg 阴性的患者,他们因其他原因被转介。所有参与者在进行内镜检查时都抽取了一份血样。样本用 4 种自动分析仪和 1 种 Elisa 试剂盒检测 tTg IgA。所有肠道活检均由当地病理学家、中心病理学家和一位对彼此均不知情的 CD 专家进行评估。当达到完全一致时,即诊断为 CD。检测的分析性能包括使用对照品和样本的精密度、批间差异和交叉污染。
在我们的队列中,所有测试的 tTg IgA-自动检测均显示出高于 98%的敏感性和高于 99%的特异性。ROC 分析显示所有 4 种分析仪的 AUC(曲线下面积)均大于 0.99。阳性预测值(PPV)均大于 0.99,阴性预测值(NPV)均大于 0.97。Elisa 试剂盒的敏感性为 95%,特异性为 96%,AUC 为 0.96,PPV 为 0.98,NPV 为 0.93。
使用我们研究中使用的 4 种高通量随机接入分析仪,基于 tTg IgA 水平至少是 ULN 的 10 倍,可以在不进行活检的情况下准确诊断 CD。