Chan A W, Butzner J D, McKenna R, Fritzler M J
Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Pediatrics. 2001 Jan;107(1):E8. doi: 10.1542/peds.107.1.e8.
An immunoglobulin A (IgA) anti-tissue transglutaminase antibody assay (anti-tTG) was compared with the conventional IgA anti-endomysium antibody assay (EMA) to assess its reliability as a screening test for celiac disease (CD) in a pediatric population.
Seventy-five IgA-sufficient and 2 IgA-deficient children who were scheduled for small intestinal biopsy for the evaluation of history or symptoms suggesting a diagnosis of CD were prospectively evaluated and enrolled in this study (gastrointestinal [GI] patients). In addition, 16 children with type I diabetes mellitus (DM) who had a positive EMA and a small bowel biopsy were included as a separate cohort. IgA anti-tTG was measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and IgA-EMA titers were determined by indirect immunofluorescence on cryopreserved sections of monkey esophagus.
Nine of the 75 IgA-sufficient GI patients had a small bowel biopsy consistent with the diagnosis of CD. Eight of 9 IgA-sufficient patients with a positive small bowel biopsy had positive anti-tTG and EMA tests. Four IgA-sufficient patients had a false-positive anti-tTG ELISA and 2 had a false-positive IgA-EMA assay. In the IgA-sufficient patients, the sensitivity was 89% and the negative predictive value was 98% for either assay. The specificities of the IgA anti-tTG and the IgA-EMA tests were 94% and 97%, respectively (not significant). The positive predictive value of the IgA anti-tTG was 67%, compared with 80% for the IgA-EMA (not significant). In the 2 IgA-deficient children, one of whom had biopsy-proved CD, both tests were negative. In the 16 DM children 12 true- and 4 false-positive IgA anti-tTG and IgA-EMA results were identified. Three of 12 complained of GI symptoms. In follow-up, thus far, none of the DM patients with a false-positive anti-tTG have developed CD.
The IgA anti-tTG antibody assay is equivalent to the IgA-EMA assay as a screening test for CD in IgA-sufficient pediatric patients. Intestinal biopsy remains the gold standard for the diagnosis of CD.
比较免疫球蛋白A(IgA)抗组织转谷氨酰胺酶抗体检测(抗tTG)与传统的IgA抗肌内膜抗体检测(EMA),以评估其作为儿科乳糜泻(CD)筛查试验的可靠性。
对75例IgA充足和2例IgA缺乏的儿童进行前瞻性评估并纳入本研究,这些儿童因有提示CD诊断的病史或症状而计划进行小肠活检(胃肠道[GI]患者)。此外,将16例I型糖尿病(DM)且EMA阳性并进行了小肠活检的儿童作为一个单独队列纳入。通过酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)检测IgA抗tTG,通过对冷冻保存的猴食管切片进行间接免疫荧光测定IgA-EMA滴度。
75例IgA充足的GI患者中有9例小肠活检结果符合CD诊断。9例小肠活检阳性的IgA充足患者中有8例抗tTG和EMA检测呈阳性。4例IgA充足的患者抗tTG ELISA结果为假阳性,2例IgA-EMA检测为假阳性。在IgA充足的患者中,两种检测方法的敏感性均为89%,阴性预测值均为98%。IgA抗tTG和IgA-EMA检测的特异性分别为94%和97%(无显著差异)。IgA抗tTG的阳性预测值为67%,IgA-EMA为80%(无显著差异)。在2例IgA缺乏的儿童中,其中1例经活检证实为CD,两种检测均为阴性。在16例DM儿童中,确定了12例假阳性和4例假阴性的IgA抗tTG和IgA-EMA结果。12例中有3例抱怨有胃肠道症状。在随访中,到目前为止,抗tTG假阳性的DM患者均未发展为CD。
对于IgA充足的儿科患者,IgA抗tTG抗体检测作为CD筛查试验与IgA-EMA检测相当。肠道活检仍然是CD诊断的金标准。