• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在4岁半以下儿童进行手动符号学习时限制笔画顺序会妨碍后续识别。

Constraining Stroke Order During Manual Symbol Learning Hinders Subsequent Recognition in Children Under 4 1/2 Years.

作者信息

Merritt Emily, Swain Shelley N, Vinci-Booher Sophia, James Karin H

机构信息

Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, United States.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2020 Mar 20;11:500. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00500. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00500
PMID:32265800
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7098985/
Abstract

In the age of technology, writing by hand has become less common than texting and keyboarding. Learning letters by hand, however, has been shown to have profound developmental importance. One aspect of writing by hand that has been understudied is the effect of learning symbols stroke-by-stroke, a dynamic action that does not occur with keyboarding. We trained children to draw novel symbols in either an instructed stroke order or in a self-directed stroke order and tested: (1) whether learning novel symbols in a self-directed stroke order benefits subsequent recognition more than learning in a specified stroke order, (2) whether seeing novel symbols unfold in the stroke order that was taught would aid in recognition, and (3) whether any effects are age-dependent. Our results demonstrate that producing a symbol with a self-directed stroke order provides more benefit to symbol recognition than instructed stroke orders in 4.0-4.5-year-old children but not in 4.5-5.0-year-old children. We found, further, that the observed recognition benefits were not affected by seeing the symbol unfold in the same stroke order it was learned during testing, suggesting that the learning was not reliant upon the exact stroke order experienced during learning. These results stress the importance of allowing children to produce symbols in a self-directed manner and, by extension, that constraining how a child learns to write can adversely affect subsequent recognition.

摘要

在科技时代,手写已不如短信和键盘输入常见。然而,通过手写学习字母已被证明具有深远的发展重要性。手写的一个未被充分研究的方面是逐笔学习符号的效果,这是一种在键盘输入中不会出现的动态行为。我们训练儿童以规定的笔画顺序或自主的笔画顺序绘制新符号,并测试:(1)以自主笔画顺序学习新符号是否比以规定笔画顺序学习更有利于后续识别;(2)按所学笔画顺序观看新符号展开是否有助于识别;(3)是否有任何效果与年龄有关。我们的结果表明,在4.0 - 4.5岁的儿童中,以自主笔画顺序绘制符号比规定笔画顺序对符号识别更有益,但在4.5 - 5.0岁的儿童中并非如此。我们进一步发现,观察到的识别优势不受测试期间按所学笔画顺序观看符号展开的影响,这表明学习并不依赖于学习期间经历的精确笔画顺序。这些结果强调了让儿童以自主方式绘制符号的重要性,进而表明限制儿童学习书写的方式可能会对后续识别产生不利影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64a1/7098985/58e306fbc553/fpsyg-11-00500-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64a1/7098985/7c1a86e2e4d7/fpsyg-11-00500-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64a1/7098985/c4aa9b6c21bd/fpsyg-11-00500-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64a1/7098985/58e306fbc553/fpsyg-11-00500-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64a1/7098985/7c1a86e2e4d7/fpsyg-11-00500-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64a1/7098985/c4aa9b6c21bd/fpsyg-11-00500-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64a1/7098985/58e306fbc553/fpsyg-11-00500-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Constraining Stroke Order During Manual Symbol Learning Hinders Subsequent Recognition in Children Under 4 1/2 Years.在4岁半以下儿童进行手动符号学习时限制笔画顺序会妨碍后续识别。
Front Psychol. 2020 Mar 20;11:500. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00500. eCollection 2020.
2
Spatial complexity facilitates ordinal mapping with a novel symbol set.空间复杂性有助于使用新符号集进行有序映射。
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 26;15(3):e0230559. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230559. eCollection 2020.
3
Repeated writing facilitates children's memory for pseudocharacters and foreign letters.重复书写有助于儿童记忆假字和外文。
Mem Cognit. 1998 Jul;26(4):804-9. doi: 10.3758/bf03211399.
4
Serial order learning of subliminal visual stimuli: evidence of multistage learning.阈下视觉刺激的序列学习:多阶段学习的证据。
Front Psychol. 2015 Feb 16;6:76. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00076. eCollection 2015.
5
Handwriting generates variable visual output to facilitate symbol learning.书写会产生多样的视觉输出,以促进符号学习。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2016 Mar;145(3):298-313. doi: 10.1037/xge0000134. Epub 2016 Jan 4.
6
Preserved Learning during the Symbol-Digit Substitution Test in Patients with Schizophrenia, Age-Matched Controls, and Elderly.精神分裂症患者、年龄匹配的对照组和老年人在符号数字替换测试中的学习能力保留情况。
Front Psychiatry. 2015 Jan 6;5:189. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2014.00189. eCollection 2014.
7
Comparison of the learnability and retention between Blissymbols and CyberGlyphs.布利兹符号与赛博符号在可学性与记忆保持方面的比较。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2005 Apr-Jun;40(2):151-69. doi: 10.1080/13682820400009980.
8
Pigeons (Columba livia) associate time intervals with symbols in a touch screen task: evidence for ordinality but not summation.鸽子(家鸽)在触屏任务中将时间间隔与符号联系起来:存在序数性证据但无累加证据。
J Comp Psychol. 2007 Feb;121(1):82-94. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.121.1.82.
9
Comparison of graphic symbol learning in individuals with aphasia and right hemisphere brain damage.失语症患者与右脑损伤患者图形符号学习的比较。
Brain Lang. 1998 May;62(3):398-421. doi: 10.1006/brln.1997.1908.
10
Learning artificial number symbols with ordinal and magnitude information.学习带有顺序和大小信息的人工数字符号。
R Soc Open Sci. 2023 Jun 7;10(6):220840. doi: 10.1098/rsos.220840. eCollection 2023 Jun.

引用本文的文献

1
From Hand to Eye With the Devil In-Between: Which Cognitive Mechanisms Underpin the Benefit From Handwriting Training When Learning Visual Graphs?从手到眼,恶魔夹在中间:学习视觉图形时,手写训练带来益处的认知机制是什么?
Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 27;12:736507. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.736507. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Knowledge about writing influences reading: Dynamic visual information about letter production facilitates letter identification.书写知识影响阅读:关于字母书写的动态视觉信息有助于字母识别。
Cortex. 2018 Jun;103:302-315. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2018.03.020. Epub 2018 Mar 30.
2
Handwriting generates variable visual output to facilitate symbol learning.书写会产生多样的视觉输出,以促进符号学习。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2016 Mar;145(3):298-313. doi: 10.1037/xge0000134. Epub 2016 Jan 4.
3
The effects of handwriting experience on functional brain development in pre-literate children.
书写体验对学龄前儿童大脑功能发育的影响。
Trends Neurosci Educ. 2012 Dec;1(1):32-42. doi: 10.1016/j.tine.2012.08.001.
4
Motor planning between 4 and 7 years of age: changes linked to executive functions.4 至 7 岁儿童的运动规划:与执行功能相关的变化。
Brain Cogn. 2010 Nov;74(2):107-11. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2010.07.003. Epub 2010 Aug 3.
5
Temporal order of strokes primes letter recognition.中风的时间顺序促进字母识别。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2007 Sep;60(9):1265-74. doi: 10.1080/17470210600937460.
6
The influence of writing practice on letter recognition in preschool children: a comparison between handwriting and typing.书写练习对学龄前儿童字母识别的影响:手写与打字的比较。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2005 May;119(1):67-79. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2004.10.019. Epub 2005 Jan 4.
7
Perceptual learning; differentiation or enrichment?知觉学习:分化还是丰富?
Psychol Rev. 1955 Jan;62(1):32-41. doi: 10.1037/h0048826.
8
A developmental study of the discrimination of letter-like forms.一项关于类字母形状辨别的发展性研究。
J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1962 Dec;55:897-906. doi: 10.1037/h0043190.
9
Authorship effects in the prediction of handwriting strokes: evidence for action simulation during action perception.笔迹笔画预测中的作者身份效应:动作感知过程中动作模拟的证据。
Q J Exp Psychol A. 2002 Jul;55(3):1027-46. doi: 10.1080/02724980143000631.
10
Relationships among processing speed, working memory, and fluid intelligence in children.儿童的处理速度、工作记忆与流体智力之间的关系。
Biol Psychol. 2000 Oct;54(1-3):1-34. doi: 10.1016/s0301-0511(00)00051-x.