Li Xiao-Yun, Jia Guo-Dong, Sun Xue-Song, Guo Shan-Shan, Liu Li-Ting, Liu Sai-Lan, Yan Jin-Jie, Luo Dong-Hua, Sun Rui, Guo Ling, Mo Hao-Yuan, Tang Lin-Quan, Chen Qiu-Yan, Mai Hai-Qiang
Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China.
Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Front Oncol. 2020 Mar 20;10:378. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00378. eCollection 2020.
To compare the survival outcomes brought by different radiation dose schedules to bone lesions and different chemotherapy regimens in bone metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). The current treatment strategy for bone metastatic NPC patients was empirically given and poorly studied before. It is of necessity to optimize the treatment for bone metastasis to enhance the therapeutic effect and increase the proportion of long-term survived patients. Three hundred patients who received chemoradiotherapy from 2002 to 2018 were involved in the study. Demographics, laboratory results, and detailed treatment plans were recorded. Radiotherapy plans were classified into three categories based on the intensity, and the survival analysis was performed using log-rank test. Multivariable analysis was made by the Cox proportional regression model. Patients who received 60-75 Gy/30-35 fractions of radiation to the metastatic bones had significantly longer bone relapse-free survival (BRFS) (HR, 0.53, 95% CI, 0.37-0.78, = 0.003), overall survival (OS) (HR, 0.63, 95% CI, 0.46-0.84, = 0.007), and progression-free survival (PFS) (HR, 0.80, 95% CI, 0.67-0.95, = 0.041). The administration of paclitaxel, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil regimen was also associated with better BRFS (HR, 0.27, 95% CI, 0.10-0.75, = 0.007), PFS (HR, 0.60, 95% CI, 0.42-0.87, = 0.007), and OS with borderline significance (HR, 0.54, 95% CI, 0.29-1.03, = 0.058). In multivariable analysis, the post-treatment EBV DNA level and radical radiation dose were proved as independent prognostic factors for both BRFS and OS. Radiotherapy to metastatic bones with palliative dose prescription should not be considered in bone metastatic NPC patients. TPF chemotherapy regimen might help to improve the survivals in NPC patients but failed to be an independent protective factor.
比较不同放射剂量方案对骨转移鼻咽癌(NPC)骨病变的生存结局以及不同化疗方案的影响。此前,骨转移NPC患者的当前治疗策略是经验性给出的,且研究较少。优化骨转移治疗以提高治疗效果并增加长期存活患者的比例很有必要。本研究纳入了2002年至2018年接受放化疗的300例患者。记录了人口统计学信息、实验室检查结果和详细的治疗方案。放疗计划根据强度分为三类,并使用对数秩检验进行生存分析。通过Cox比例回归模型进行多变量分析。接受60 - 75 Gy/30 - 35次分割放疗的骨转移患者具有显著更长的无骨复发生存期(BRFS)(风险比[HR],0.53,95%置信区间[CI],0.37 - 0.78,P = 0.003)、总生存期(OS)(HR,0.63,95% CI,0.46 - 0.84,P = 0.007)和无进展生存期(PFS)(HR,0.80, 95% CI,0.67 - 0.95, P = 0.041)。紫杉醇、顺铂和5 -氟尿嘧啶方案与更好的BRFS(HR,0.27,95% CI,0.10 - 0.75,P = 0.007)、PFS(HR,0.60,95% CI,0.42 - 0.87,P = 0.007)以及具有临界显著性的OS(HR,0.54,95% CI,0.29 - (此处原文可能有误,推测为1.00)1.03,P = 0.058)相关。在多变量分析中,治疗后EBV DNA水平和根治性放疗剂量被证明是BRFS和OS的独立预后因素。骨转移NPC患者不应考虑采用姑息剂量处方对骨转移灶进行放疗。TPF化疗方案可能有助于改善NPC患者的生存期,但未能成为独立的保护因素。