• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于转化的社区-大学伙伴关系特征:来自疾病控制与预防中心预防研究中心的证据

Community-University Partnership Characteristics for Translation: Evidence From CDC's Prevention Research Centers.

作者信息

Young Belinda-Rose, Leeks Kimberly D, Bish Connie L, Mihas Paul, Marcelin Rose A, Kline Jennifer, Ulin Brigette F

机构信息

Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, Oak Ridge, TN, United States.

Department of Health Behavior, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2020 Mar 20;8:79. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00079. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2020.00079
PMID:32266196
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7099981/
Abstract

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Prevention Research Centers (PRC) Program supports community engagement and partnerships to translate health evidence into practice. Translation is dependent on the quality of partnerships. However, questions remain about the necessary characteristics to develop and maintain translation partnerships. To identify the characteristics that influence community-university partnerships and examine alignment with the Knowledge to Action (K2A) Framework. Final Progress Reports ( = 37) from PRCs funded from September 2009 to September 2014 were reviewed in 2016-2017 to determine eligibility. Eligible PRCs included those that translated an innovation following the applied research phase (2009-2014) of the PRC award ( = 12). The PRCs and the adopters (i.e., community organizations) were recruited and participated in qualitative interviews in 2017. Ten PRCs (83.3% response rate) and four adopters participated. Twelve codes (i.e., elements) were found that impacted partnerships along the translation continuum (e.g., adequate communication, technical assistance). Each element aligned with the K2A Framework at multiple steps within the translation phase. The intersection between the and is termed a "characteristic." Using interview data, fifty-two unique partnership characteristics for translation were found. The results suggest multiple characteristics that impact translation partnerships. The inclusion of these partnership characteristics in policies and practices that seek to move practice-based or research-based evidence into widespread use may impact the receptivity by partners and evidence uptake by communities. Using the K2A Framework to assess translation partnerships was helpful and could be considered in process evaluations to inform translation partnership improvement.

摘要

美国疾病控制与预防中心的预防研究中心(PRC)项目支持社区参与及伙伴关系,以将健康证据转化为实际行动。转化依赖于伙伴关系的质量。然而,关于建立和维持转化伙伴关系所需的特征仍存在问题。为确定影响社区-大学伙伴关系的特征,并检验与“知识到行动”(K2A)框架的一致性。2016 - 2017年对2009年9月至2014年9月获得资助的预防研究中心的最终进展报告(n = 37)进行了审查,以确定其是否符合条件。符合条件的预防研究中心包括那些在预防研究中心奖励的应用研究阶段(2009 - 2014年)之后转化了一项创新成果的中心(n = 12)。2017年招募了这些预防研究中心及其采用者(即社区组织)并让他们参与了定性访谈。十个预防研究中心(回应率83.3%)和四个采用者参与了访谈。发现有十二个编码(即要素)在转化连续过程中影响伙伴关系(例如,充分沟通、技术援助)。每个要素在转化阶段的多个步骤上与K2A框架相符。编码与要素的交叉点被称为一个“特征”。利用访谈数据,发现了52个独特的转化伙伴关系特征。结果表明有多个特征影响转化伙伴关系。将这些伙伴关系特征纳入旨在将基于实践或基于研究的证据广泛应用的政策和实践中,可能会影响伙伴的接受度以及社区对证据的采纳。使用K2A框架评估转化伙伴关系很有帮助,并且可以在过程评估中加以考虑,以为改进转化伙伴关系提供信息。

相似文献

1
Community-University Partnership Characteristics for Translation: Evidence From CDC's Prevention Research Centers.用于转化的社区-大学伙伴关系特征:来自疾病控制与预防中心预防研究中心的证据
Front Public Health. 2020 Mar 20;8:79. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00079. eCollection 2020.
2
The Prevention Research Centers Healthy Aging Research Network.预防研究中心健康老龄化研究网络
Prev Chronic Dis. 2006 Jan;3(1):A17. Epub 2005 Dec 15.
3
Evaluating Policy, Systems, and Environmental Change Interventions: Lessons Learned From CDC's Prevention Research Centers.评估政策、系统和环境变化干预措施:从美国疾病控制与预防中心预防研究中心吸取的经验教训
Prev Chronic Dis. 2015 Oct 15;12:E174. doi: 10.5888/pcd12.150281.
4
Prevention Research Centers and COVID-19: Models of a Community-Engaged Response to a Public Health Emergency.预防研究中心与 COVID-19:社区参与应对公共卫生紧急事件的典范。
Public Health Rep. 2022 Mar-Apr;137(2):226-233. doi: 10.1177/00333549211059491. Epub 2022 Jan 21.
5
A review of reviews on principles, strategies, outcomes and impacts of research partnerships approaches: a first step in synthesising the research partnership literature.对研究伙伴关系方法的原则、策略、结果和影响的综述:综合研究伙伴关系文献的第一步。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2020 May 25;18(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-0544-9.
6
An organizing framework for translation in public health: the Knowledge to Action Framework.公共卫生翻译的组织框架:知识转化框架。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2011 Mar;8(2):A46. Epub 2011 Feb 15.
7
Community capacity building in CDC's Community Coalition Partnership Programs for the Prevention of Teen Pregnancy.疾病控制与预防中心预防青少年怀孕社区联盟伙伴计划中的社区能力建设。
J Adolesc Health. 2005 Sep;37(3 Suppl):S11-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2005.06.001.
8
Conceptualising the initiation of researcher and research user partnerships: a meta-narrative review.概念化研究人员和研究用户伙伴关系的启动:元叙述性综述。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2020 Feb 18;18(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-0536-9.
9
Community health partnerships for chronic disease prevention among Latinos: the San Diego Prevention Research Center.拉丁裔慢性病预防社区健康伙伴关系:圣地亚哥预防研究中心
J Prim Prev. 2013 Apr;34(1-2):17-29. doi: 10.1007/s10935-013-0292-5.
10
Academic-health department collaborative relationships are reciprocal and strengthen public health practice: results from a study of academic research centers.学术机构与卫生部门的合作关系是相互的,且能加强公共卫生实践:一项对学术研究中心的研究结果
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2014 May-Jun;20(3):342-8. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0b013e3182a152c6.

引用本文的文献

1
Developing criteria for research translation decision-making in community settings: a systematic review and thematic analysis informed by the Knowledge to Action Framework and community input.制定社区环境中研究转化决策的标准:基于知识转化为行动框架和社区意见的系统评价与主题分析
Implement Sci Commun. 2022 Jul 16;3(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s43058-022-00316-z.
2
A scoping review of the evaluation and effectiveness of technical assistance.技术援助评估与效果的范围综述
Implement Sci Commun. 2022 Jun 28;3(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s43058-022-00314-1.
3
Prevention Research Centers and COVID-19: Models of a Community-Engaged Response to a Public Health Emergency.

本文引用的文献

1
Community-University Partnerships for Research and Practice: Application of an Interactive and Contextual Model of Collaboration.社区与大学研究及实践伙伴关系:一种交互式情境合作模式的应用
J High Educ Outreach Engagem. 2016;20(2):55-84.
2
Challenges and Benefits in Designing and Implementing a Team-Based Research Mentorship Experience in Translational Research.在转化研究中设计和实施基于团队的研究指导经验所面临的挑战与益处
Pedagogy Health Promot. 2015 Dec 1;1(4):233-246. doi: 10.1177/2373379915600174.
3
Systems thinking tools as applied to community-based participatory research: a case study.
预防研究中心与 COVID-19:社区参与应对公共卫生紧急事件的典范。
Public Health Rep. 2022 Mar-Apr;137(2):226-233. doi: 10.1177/00333549211059491. Epub 2022 Jan 21.
系统思维工具在基于社区的参与式研究中的应用:一个案例研究。
Health Educ Behav. 2012 Dec;39(6):745-51. doi: 10.1177/1090198111430708. Epub 2012 Mar 30.
4
From controlled trial to community adoption: the multisite translational community trial.从对照试验到社区采用:多地点转化性社区试验。
Am J Public Health. 2011 Aug;101(8):e17-27. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2010.300104. Epub 2011 Jun 16.
5
An organizing framework for translation in public health: the Knowledge to Action Framework.公共卫生翻译的组织框架:知识转化框架。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2011 Mar;8(2):A46. Epub 2011 Feb 15.
6
Knowledge Brokering: The missing link in the evidence to action chain?知识中介:证据到行动链条中缺失的环节?
Evid Policy. 2009 Aug;5(3):267-279. doi: 10.1332/174426409X463811.
7
Community engagement in research: frameworks for education and peer review.社区参与研究:教育和同行评审框架。
Am J Public Health. 2010 Aug;100(8):1380-7. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.178137. Epub 2010 Jun 17.
8
A description of a knowledge broker role implemented as part of a randomized controlled trial evaluating three knowledge translation strategies.描述了一个知识经纪人角色,该角色是作为评估三种知识转化策略的随机对照试验的一部分实施的。
Implement Sci. 2009 Apr 27;4:23. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-23.
9
The need for systems change: reflections on knowledge translation and organizational change.系统变革的必要性:关于知识转化与组织变革的思考
J Adv Nurs. 2009 Jan;65(1):217-28. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04864.x. Epub 2008 Nov 14.
10
Making research relevant: if it is an evidence-based practice, where's the practice-based evidence?让研究具有相关性:如果这是一种循证实践,那么基于实践的证据在哪里?
Fam Pract. 2008 Dec;25 Suppl 1:i20-4. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmn055. Epub 2008 Sep 15.